In quantum computing, noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices offer unprecedented computational capabilities but are vulnerable to errors, notably measurement inaccuracies that impact computation accuracy. This study explores the efficacy of error mitigation techniques in improving quantum circuit performance on NISQ devices. Techniques such as dynamic decoupling (DD), twirled readout error extraction (T-REx) and zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) are examined through extensive experimentation on an ideal simulator, IBM Kyoto, and IBM Osaka quantum computers. Results reveal significant performance discrepancies across scenarios, with error mitigation techniques notably enhancing both estimator result and variance values, aligning more closely with ideal simulator outcomes. The comparison results with ideal simulator (having expected result value 0.8284) shows that T-Rex has improved results on IBM Kyoto and enhanced average expected result value from 0.09 to 0.35. Similarly, DD has improved average expected result values from 0.2492 to 0.3788 on IBM Osaka. These findings underscore the critical role of error mitigation in bolstering quantum computation reliability. The results suggest that selection of mitigation technique depends upon quantum circuit and its depth, type of hardware and operations to be performed.
In quantum computing, noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices offer unprecedented computational capabilities but are vulnerable to errors, notably measurement inaccuracies that impact computation accuracy. This study explores the efficacy of error mitigation techniques in improving quantum circuit performance on NISQ devices. Techniques such as dynamic decoupling (DD), twirled readout error extraction (T-REx) and zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) are examined through extensive experimentation on an ideal simulator, IBM Kyoto, and IBM Osaka quantum computers. Results reveal significant performance discrepancies across scenarios, with error mitigation techniques notably enhancing both estimator result and variance values, aligning more closely with ideal simulator outcomes. The comparison results with ideal simulator (having expected result value 0.8284) shows that T-Rex has improved results on IBM Kyoto and enhanced average expected result value from 0.09 to 0.35. Similarly, DD has improved average expected result values from 0.2492 to 0.3788 on IBM Osaka. These findings underscore the critical role of error mitigation in bolstering quantum computation reliability. The results suggest that selection of mitigation technique depends upon quantum circuit and its depth, type of hardware and operations to be performed.
Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers suffer from gate errors, decoherence, and readout noise that can severely impact even small quantum circuits. In this work, the application of error mitigation techniques was investigated to a simple two-bit quantum comparator circuit executed on real IBM Quantum hardware. The 2-bit comparator is a basic quantum logic circuit that compares two 2-qubit binary numbers and outputs whether the first number is greater than, equal to, or less than the second. This comparator was implemented using Qiskit and studied its performance under realistic noise. This study on error mitigation concentrates on dynamical decoupling (DD), which is a coherent error suppression strategy that cancels coherent errors by inserting echo pulse sequences during idle time periods. The results demonstrate that dynamical decoupling improves accuracy for the comparator circuit - accurate outcomes are closer to the ideal outcome in the absence of noise. These results show that dynamical decoupling yields notable accuracy improvements for the comparator circuit - bringing measured outcomes closer to the ideal noiseless results. A performance analysis (including a bar-chart of accuracy after mitigation vs. before mitigation simulation) is presented to quantify these improvements. Finally, the implications of applying error mitigation in small quantum circuits and its relevance for near-term quantum computing are also discussed, where such techniques can enhance the reliability of quantum computations in the absence of full quantum error correction.
In the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, quantum error mitigation will be a necessary tool to extract useful performance out of quantum devices. However, there is a big gap between the noise models often assumed by error mitigation techniques and the actual noise on quantum devices. As a consequence, there arises a gap between the theoretical expectations of the techniques and their everyday performance. Cloud users of quantum devices in particular, who often take the devices as they are, feel this gap the most. How should they parametrize their uncertainty in the usefulness of these techniques and be able to make judgement calls between resources required to implement error mitigation and the accuracy required at the algorithmic level? To answer the first question, we introduce hypothesis testing within the framework of quantum error mitigation and for the second question, we propose an inclusive figure of merit that accounts for both resource requirement and mitigation efficiency of an error mitigation implementation. The figure of merit is useful to weigh the trade-offs between the scalability and accuracy of various error mitigation methods. Finally, using the hypothesis testing and the figure of merit, we experimentally evaluate 16 error mitigation pipelines composed of singular methods such as zero noise extrapolation, randomized compilation, measurement error mitigation, dynamical decoupling, and mitigation with estimation circuits. In total our data involved running 275,640 circuits on two IBM quantum computers.
Dynamic quantum circuits integrate mid-circuit measurements and feed-forward operations to enable real-time classical processing and conditional quantum logic. These capabilities are central to key quantum protocols such as quantum error correction, and have recently demonstrated significant potential for reducing quantum resources, including circuit depth and gate count, across a range of applications. However, executing dynamic circuits on real quantum hardware introduces a critical trade-off: while resource requirements decrease, circuit fidelity degrades due to high error rates of mid-circuit measurements, as well as the decoherence errors accumulated during the extended idle periods introduced by both mid-circuit measurements and feed-forward operations. In this paper, we systematically investigate the impact of standard error mitigation techniques on dynamic circuit applications pertaining to Hamiltonian simulation and ground state estimation of physically relevant systems like the Heisenberg model. We explore dynamical decoupling (DD) as a strategy to suppress decoherence and crosstalk errors during idle windows introduced by mid-circuit measurements and feed-forward delays, and also examine error mitigation via zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE). Through experiments conducted on IBM quantum hardware, we benchmark effective combinations of these strategies that maximize the practical benefits of dynamic quantum circuits in these applications. We demonstrate that a combination of DD and ZNE is effective in mitigating the errors introduced during mid-circuit measurements and feed-forward operations, as well as the errors arising from faulty measurements. This approach yields a energy gap improvement of at least 60% in ground state estimation and reduces observed error of time-evolved states by up to 99% for the Ising model and up to 20% for the Heisenberg model.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) bridges the gap between today's noisy NISQ hardware and fault-tolerant quantum computing by reducing the effect of hardware errors on expectation value estimates without the qubit overhead of full quantum error correction. This paper proposes the Quantum Error Mitigation Design (QEMD) framework, a systematic evaluation of six QEM techniques across four circuit families on IBM Quantum Eagle and IonQ Forte: Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), Clifford Data Regression (CDR), Symmetry Verification (SV), Dynamical Decoupling (DD), and a novel Adaptive Ensemble Mitigation (AEM) combining ZNE and CDR with context-aware technique selection. QEMD finds: ZNE 3-point Richardson provides the best cost-performance trade-off for QAOA and VQE circuits (4.8x overhead, 28.4pp error reduction); PEC provides the highest accuracy but at 48x shot overhead -- practical only for n <= 12; DD reduces coherence-limited errors by 18.4% on IonQ Forte at zero shot overhead; AEM outperforms all individual techniques by 6.4pp at 8.4x overhead. QEMD provides a decision guide mapping circuit type, qubit count, and shot budget to optimal QEM technique selection.
Abstract Quantum computing has recently emerged as a novel paradigm for solving problems otherwise intractable on classical computers, yet the practical progress of quantum computers is severely impacted by noise, decoherence, and imperfect gate operations in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Specific to IBM Quantum hardware, imperfections due to readout error, gate errors, and device drift, which depends on time, resolves limits for the accuracy of outputs from our algorithms. The mitigation strategies currently used, for example, Measurement Error Mitigation (MEM), Zero Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), and Clifford Data Regression (CDR), offer improvement over raw, unmitigated outputs, but they are static and not dynamic; the reduction of noise in within an NISQ device is temporal and can vary in patterns that are non-zero. In addition to this, using the conventional methods provides inconsistent and suboptimal results.This study will provide enhanced reliability with respect to performing quantum computation on IBM Quantum hardware with a unique mitigation framework that is adaptive and computationally efficient for a high-fidelity output. The problem taken on here is the failure of existing error mitigation strategies to provide adaptive noise compensation, as they assume a statically-distributed error, despite the performance-related characteristics already being documented in regards to calibration drift and variation over time.To achieve this, we propose a Hybrid Adaptive Error Mitigation (HAEM) approach that includes baseline measurement error mitigation and an additional correction layer that utilizes realtime calibration information, along with lightweight machine learning models. The approach can be broken down into three steps: (i) perform standard measurement error mitigation to reduce classical readout noise, (ii) execute compact calibration circuits, such as Bell states, GHZ states and Clifford benchmarks to capture then current error profile of the device, and (iii) use a lightweight machine learning model (having been trained on historical and newest calibration data) to dynamically change the mitigation weights applied for the target quantum algorithm. All implementation is done using Qiskit Runtime to ensure low-latency execution, and we completed experiments on both Qiskit Aer noisy simulators and IBM Quantum devices.Initial results suggest HAEM improved the outputs of quantum algorithms' fidelity compared to the unmitigated runs and the baseline measurement error mitigation (MEM) runs. On the noisy simulators, HAEM increased fidelity from a raw performance of 0.65 to 0.87, nearly a 34% improvement. In fairer hardware-like scenarios, fidelity-on-average was persistently 12% better than MEM, with nearly equal time duration for the additional adaptive measurements. The adaptive aspect of HAEM consistently supported subsequent calibration cycles of the device and was effective to continue providing fidelity improvements despite the static mitigation performance degrading.To sum up, the proposed HAEM framework is a modern and viable alternative for error mitigation which brings together the benefits of baseline approaches with corrections that are driven by fixed-function error-corrective, adaptive learning. As both learning-based and standard baseline approaches can only achieve fixed levels of performance, HAEM, through its use of noise mitigation both at execution time and through correlating it with standard data, provides a route towards reliable quantum computations on current IBM hardware. HAEM also presents a contribution to the NISQ error-resilient landscape, and however it is intended that it will continue to improve future applications of hybrid workflows of quantum and classical computation where error mitigation and resilience is important.
Quantum computing promises to address problems in simulation, optimization, and chemistry, but current hardware operates in the noisy intermediate-scale (NISQ) regime where coherence limits, gate imperfections, and readout errors restrict performance. Improving calibration and mitigating errors therefore remain essential. This thesis analyzes error reduction on superconducting transmon qubits through calibration, gate analysis, and circuit-level mitigation. It compares single-qubit amplitude calibration methods and analyzes two-qubit gates based on the cross-resonance interaction, identifying differences in precision, convergence, and performance. In addition, it develops Inverted-Circuit Zero-Noise-Extrapolation (IC-ZNE) which measures effective error strength using inverted circuits. Compared to standard ZNE, IC-ZNE achieves results closer to ideal values and reduces observable errors. Overall, the presented methods improve the reliability of near-term quantum processors.