Physical Review A

Reply to “Comment on ‘Multitime quantum communication: Interesting but not counterfactual' ”

Robert B. Griffiths

Published Nov 8, 2023• 0 citations

Abstract

This is a response to comments and criticisms found in the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev. A 108, 056201 (2023)] by Vaidman on the paper in Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023).Received 27 September 2023Accepted 18 October 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.056202©2023 American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasQuantum communicationQuantum foundationsQuantum information theoryQuantum Information, Science & Technology

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.108.056202

Related papers

Reply to “Comment on ‘Subluminality of relativistic quantum tunneling' ”

Lorenzo Gavassino, Marcelo M. Disconzi

We show that the criticism raised by Dumont and Pollak [Dumont and Pollak, preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. A 108, 036201 (2023)] is based on a flawed understanding of our analysis.Received 14 July 2023Accepted 10 August 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.036202©2023 American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasDirac equationQuantum communicationRelativistic quantum informationRelativistic wave equationsSpecial relativityPhysical SystemsElectronsParticles & FieldsQuantum Information, Science & Technology

Physical Review ASep 5, 20230 citations

Publisher's Note: Evaluation of counterfactuality in counterfactual communication protocols [Phys. Rev. A 96 , 062316 (2017)]

David R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur, A. N. O. Gottfries, C. H. W. Barnes

Received 27 December 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.019901©2018 American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasQuantum communicationQuantum protocolsQuantum Information

Physical Review AJan 3, 20180 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Direct counterfactual transmission of a quantum state’”

Zheng-Hong Li, M. Al-Amri, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

We address criticisms made in the preceding Comment by Vaidman regarding our claims of counterfactuality of transmission of a quantum state in our recent work.Received 4 April 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.066302©2016 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJun 2, 201612 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Measurements without probabilities in the final state proposal’”

Raphael Bousso A, Douglas Stanford

Received 3 April 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.088502© 2018 American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasEntanglement in field theoryQuantum aspects of black holesGravitation, Cosmology & AstrophysicsParticles & Fields

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Apr 25, 20181 citation

Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman

Robert B. Griffiths

This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)

arXiv:2310.05968Sep 23, 20230 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics’ ’’

Gerard J Milburn

Finkelstein’s criticism [Phys. Rev. A (to be published)] of my paper [Phys. Rev. A 44, 5401 (1991)] presupposes time measurements of an accuracy explicitly ruled out in the paper.Received 7 July 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.2415©1993 American Physical Society

Physical Review AMar 1, 199317 citations