Physical Review A

Reply to “Comment on ‘Direct counterfactual transmission of a quantum state’”

Zheng-Hong Li, M. Al-Amri, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

Published Jun 2, 2016• 12 citations

Abstract

We address criticisms made in the preceding Comment by Vaidman regarding our claims of counterfactuality of transmission of a quantum state in our recent work.Received 4 April 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.066302©2016 American Physical Society

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.93.066302

Related papers

Reply to “Comment on ‘Multitime quantum communication: Interesting but not counterfactual' ”

Robert B. Griffiths

This is a response to comments and criticisms found in the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev. A 108, 056201 (2023)] by Vaidman on the paper in Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023).Received 27 September 2023Accepted 18 October 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.056202©2023 American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasQuantum communicationQuantum foundationsQuantum information theoryQuantum Information, Science & Technology

Physical Review ANov 8, 20230 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Identical motion in classical and quantum mechanics’ ”

Adam J. Makowski, S. Konkel

We show briefly that claims in the preceding Comment by Mostafazadeh [Phys. Rev. A 60, 5144 (1999)] are based mostly on an empty premise.Received 14 June 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.5146©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review ADec 1, 19992 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Consistency, amplitudes, and probabilities in quantum theory’ ”

Ariel Caticha

I reply to Finkelstein’s comment [preceding paper, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1723 (1999)] and remark on the meanings conveyed by the word “amplitude.”Received 23 December 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.1725©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review AAug 1, 19990 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Applicability of Hamilton’s equations in the quantum soliton problem’ ’’

David W. Brown, Bruce J. West, Katja Lindenberg

A response is made to the three assertions of Škrinjar, Kapov,and Stojanović [Phys. Rev. A 37, 639 (1988)].Received 24 February 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.37.642©1988 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJan 1, 19889 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Quantum chaotic system in the generalized Husimi representation’ ’’

Karol Życzkowski

The interpretation of Milburn in the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev A 39, 2749 (1989)] is confirmed in further numerical study.Received 7 December 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.39.2751©1989 American Physical Society

Physical Review AMar 1, 19891 citation

Comment on “Nonclassical States: An Observable Criterion”

Lajos Diósi

A Comment on the Letter by Werner Vogel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1849 (2000). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 14 April 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2841©2000 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersSep 1, 200024 citations