Physical Review A

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Quantum chaotic system in the generalized Husimi representation’ ’’

Karol Życzkowski

Published Mar 1, 1989• 1 citation

Abstract

The interpretation of Milburn in the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev A 39, 2749 (1989)] is confirmed in further numerical study.Received 7 December 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.39.2751©1989 American Physical Society

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.39.2751

Related papers

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Applicability of Hamilton’s equations in the quantum soliton problem’ ’’

David W. Brown, Bruce J. West, Katja Lindenberg

A response is made to the three assertions of Škrinjar, Kapov,and Stojanović [Phys. Rev. A 37, 639 (1988)].Received 24 February 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.37.642©1988 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJan 1, 19889 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Identical motion in classical and quantum mechanics’ ”

Adam J. Makowski, S. Konkel

We show briefly that claims in the preceding Comment by Mostafazadeh [Phys. Rev. A 60, 5144 (1999)] are based mostly on an empty premise.Received 14 June 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.5146©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review ADec 1, 19992 citations

Comment on ‘‘Quantum effects in a macroscopic system’’

Axel Schenzle, Ralph G. DeVoe, John A. Hoffnagle +1 more

Physical Review LettersAug 24, 19872 citations

Comment on “Chaotic Masking Scheme with a Linear Inverse System”

H.-Y. Sun, L. Wang

A Comment on the Letter by Ali Oksasogla and Tayfun Akgul, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4595 (1995). The authors of the Letter offer a reply.Received 30 January 1996DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2842©1996 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersSep 23, 19961 citation

Reply to “Comment on ‘Time-dependent general quantum quadratic Hamiltonian system” ’

Kyu Hwang Yeon, Chung‐In Um, Thomas F. George

In reply to the Comment by Zheng [Phys. Rev. A 68, 052108 (2003)], it is reaffirmed that the propagator and wave function derived originally are correct.Received 26 October 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.066102©2006 American Physical Society

Physical Review ADec 15, 20060 citations

Further comment on ‘‘Optimization of approximate solutions to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation’’

José M. Maidagan, Rubén Darío Piacentini

We show that the Reply of Weglein [Phys. Rev. A 31, 4025 (1985)] to our previous Comment [Phys. Rev. A 31, 4023 (1985)] is not valid.Received 18 September 1985DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.35.933©1987 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJan 1, 19870 citations