Physical Review A

Reply to “Comment on ‘Time-dependent general quantum quadratic Hamiltonian system” ’

Kyu Hwang Yeon, Chung‐In Um, Thomas F. George

Published Dec 15, 2006• 0 citations

Abstract

In reply to the Comment by Zheng [Phys. Rev. A 68, 052108 (2003)], it is reaffirmed that the propagator and wave function derived originally are correct.Received 26 October 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.066102©2006 American Physical Society

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.74.066102

Related papers

Further comment on ‘‘Optimization of approximate solutions to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation’’

José M. Maidagan, Rubén Darío Piacentini

We show that the Reply of Weglein [Phys. Rev. A 31, 4025 (1985)] to our previous Comment [Phys. Rev. A 31, 4023 (1985)] is not valid.Received 18 September 1985DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.35.933©1987 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJan 1, 19870 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Quantum chaotic system in the generalized Husimi representation’ ’’

Karol Życzkowski

The interpretation of Milburn in the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev A 39, 2749 (1989)] is confirmed in further numerical study.Received 7 December 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.39.2751©1989 American Physical Society

Physical Review AMar 1, 19891 citation

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Applicability of Hamilton’s equations in the quantum soliton problem’ ’’

David W. Brown, Bruce J. West, Katja Lindenberg

A response is made to the three assertions of Škrinjar, Kapov,and Stojanović [Phys. Rev. A 37, 639 (1988)].Received 24 February 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.37.642©1988 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJan 1, 19889 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Identical motion in classical and quantum mechanics’ ”

Adam J. Makowski, S. Konkel

We show briefly that claims in the preceding Comment by Mostafazadeh [Phys. Rev. A 60, 5144 (1999)] are based mostly on an empty premise.Received 14 June 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.5146©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review ADec 1, 19992 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics’ ’’

Gerard J Milburn

Finkelstein’s criticism [Phys. Rev. A (to be published)] of my paper [Phys. Rev. A 44, 5401 (1991)] presupposes time measurements of an accuracy explicitly ruled out in the paper.Received 7 July 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.2415©1993 American Physical Society

Physical Review AMar 1, 199317 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Consistency, amplitudes, and probabilities in quantum theory’ ”

Ariel Caticha

I reply to Finkelstein’s comment [preceding paper, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1723 (1999)] and remark on the meanings conveyed by the word “amplitude.”Received 23 December 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.1725©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review AAug 1, 19990 citations