Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics’ ’’

Gerard J Milburn

Published Mar 1, 1993• 17 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Finkelstein’s criticism [Phys. Rev. A (to be published)] of my paper [Phys. Rev. A 44, 5401 (1991)] presupposes time measurements of an accuracy explicitly ruled out in the paper.Received 7 July 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.2415©1993 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physreva.47.2415

Related papers

Reply to “Comment on ‘Consistency, amplitudes, and probabilities in quantum theory’ ”

Ariel Caticha

I reply to Finkelstein’s comment [preceding paper, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1723 (1999)] and remark on the meanings conveyed by the word “amplitude.”Received 23 December 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.1725©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1999•0 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Identical motion in classical and quantum mechanics’ ”

Adam J. Makowski, S. Konkel

We show briefly that claims in the preceding Comment by Mostafazadeh [Phys. Rev. A 60, 5144 (1999)] are based mostly on an empty premise.Received 14 June 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.5146©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1999•2 citations

Further comment on ‘‘Optimization of approximate solutions to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation’’

José M. Maidagan, Rubén Darío Piacentini

We show that the Reply of Weglein [Phys. Rev. A 31, 4025 (1985)] to our previous Comment [Phys. Rev. A 31, 4023 (1985)] is not valid.Received 18 September 1985DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.35.933©1987 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1987•0 citations

Comment on “Measurement of the Intrinsic Dissipation of a Macroscopic System in the Quantum Regime”

Siyuan Han, R. Rouse

A Comment on the Letter by C. Cosmelli, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5357 (1999). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 2 August 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4191©2001 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Apr 30, 2001•5 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Time-dependent general quantum quadratic Hamiltonian system” ’

Kyu Hwang Yeon, Chung‐In Um, Thomas F. George

In reply to the Comment by Zheng [Phys. Rev. A 68, 052108 (2003)], it is reaffirmed that the propagator and wave function derived originally are correct.Received 26 October 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.066102©2006 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Dec 15, 2006•0 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Multitime quantum communication: Interesting but not counterfactual' ”

Robert B. Griffiths

This is a response to comments and criticisms found in the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev. A 108, 056201 (2023)] by Vaidman on the paper in Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023).Received 27 September 2023Accepted 18 October 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.056202©2023 American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasQuantum communicationQuantum foundationsQuantum information theoryQuantum Information, Science & Technology

Physical Review A•Nov 8, 2023•0 citations
Finkelstein’s criticism [Phys. Rev. A (to be published)] of my paper [Phys. Rev. A 44, 5401 (1991)] presupposes time measurements of an accuracy explicitly ruled out in the paper.Received 7 July 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.2415©1993 American Physical Society