Physical Review A

Reply to “Comment on ‘Subluminality of relativistic quantum tunneling' ”

Lorenzo Gavassino, Marcelo M. Disconzi

Published Sep 5, 2023• 0 citations

Abstract

We show that the criticism raised by Dumont and Pollak [Dumont and Pollak, preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. A 108, 036201 (2023)] is based on a flawed understanding of our analysis.Received 14 July 2023Accepted 10 August 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.036202©2023 American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasDirac equationQuantum communicationRelativistic quantum informationRelativistic wave equationsSpecial relativityPhysical SystemsElectronsParticles & FieldsQuantum Information, Science & Technology

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.108.036202

Related papers

Reply to “Comment on ‘Multitime quantum communication: Interesting but not counterfactual' ”

Robert B. Griffiths

This is a response to comments and criticisms found in the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev. A 108, 056201 (2023)] by Vaidman on the paper in Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023).Received 27 September 2023Accepted 18 October 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.056202©2023 American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasQuantum communicationQuantum foundationsQuantum information theoryQuantum Information, Science & Technology

Physical Review ANov 8, 20230 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Nonequilibrium steady state phases of the interacting Aubry-André-Harper model' ”

Yongchan Yoo, Junhyun Lee, Brian G. Swingle

Received 13 April 2021Accepted 10 May 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.237102©2021 American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasMany-body localizationQuantum entanglementQuantum transportPhysical Systems1-dimensional spin chainsTechniquesTensor network methodsStatistical PhysicsCondensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Physical review. B./Physical review. BJun 21, 20210 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Direct counterfactual transmission of a quantum state’”

Zheng-Hong Li, M. Al-Amri, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

We address criticisms made in the preceding Comment by Vaidman regarding our claims of counterfactuality of transmission of a quantum state in our recent work.Received 4 April 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.066302©2016 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJun 2, 201612 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Measurements without probabilities in the final state proposal’”

Raphael Bousso A, Douglas Stanford

Received 3 April 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.088502© 2018 American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasEntanglement in field theoryQuantum aspects of black holesGravitation, Cosmology & AstrophysicsParticles & Fields

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Apr 25, 20181 citation

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics’ ’’

Gerard J Milburn

Finkelstein’s criticism [Phys. Rev. A (to be published)] of my paper [Phys. Rev. A 44, 5401 (1991)] presupposes time measurements of an accuracy explicitly ruled out in the paper.Received 7 July 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.2415©1993 American Physical Society

Physical Review AMar 1, 199317 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Identical motion in classical and quantum mechanics’ ”

Adam J. Makowski, S. Konkel

We show briefly that claims in the preceding Comment by Mostafazadeh [Phys. Rev. A 60, 5144 (1999)] are based mostly on an empty premise.Received 14 June 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.5146©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review ADec 1, 19992 citations