arXiv:2310.05968

Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman

Robert B. Griffiths

Published Sep 23, 2023• 0 citations

Abstract

This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2310.05968

Related papers

Reply to "Comment on Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication"

Hatim Salih, Li, Zheng-Hong, M. Al-Amri +1 more

In reply to Vaidman's Comment [arXiv:1304.6689], we show that his claim that our Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication [PRL 110, 170502 (2013), arXiv:1206.2042] is counterfactual only for one type of information bit is wrong.

arXiv:1404.5392Apr 22, 20144 citations

Reply to Comment on: "Fluctuation Theorem for Many-Body Pure Quantum States"

Eiki Iyoda, Kazuya Kaneko, Takahiro Sagawa

We reply to Comment by J. Gemmer, L. Knipschild, R. Steinigeweg (arXiv:1712.02128) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 100601 (2017).

arXiv:1712.05172Dec 14, 20171 citation

Comment on “Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication”

Lev Vaidman A

I argue that recent "Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication" by Salih et al. [PRL 110, 170502 (2013), arXiv:1206.2042] is counterfactual only for one type of the information bit.

arXiv:1304.6689Physical Review LettersMay 23, 201464 citations

Reply to "Comment to 'The laws of physics do not prohibit counterfactual communication'"

H Salih, Jonte R. Hance, W McCutcheon +1 more

Jun 10, 20250 citations

Reply to Comment on "Contextuality in bosonic bunching"

Paweł Kurzyński, Akihito Soeda, Jayne E. Thompson +1 more

This is a reply to arXiv:1409.7513 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 138901 (2014)].

arXiv:1409.8025Sep 29, 20140 citations

Reply to Comment on "State-independent experimental test of quantum contextuality in an indivisible system"

Chong Zu, Y. X. Wang, Deng, D. -L. +5 more

This is a reply to the comment from E. Amselem et al. on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 150401 (2012), arXiv:1207.0059).

arXiv:1302.0619Feb 4, 20130 citations