arXiv:1404.5392

Reply to "Comment on Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication"

Hatim Salih, Li, Zheng-Hong, M. Al-Amri, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

Published Apr 22, 2014• 4 citations

Abstract

In reply to Vaidman's Comment [arXiv:1304.6689], we show that his claim that our Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication [PRL 110, 170502 (2013), arXiv:1206.2042] is counterfactual only for one type of information bit is wrong.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1404.5392

Related papers

Comment on “Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication”

Lev Vaidman A

I argue that recent "Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication" by Salih et al. [PRL 110, 170502 (2013), arXiv:1206.2042] is counterfactual only for one type of the information bit.

arXiv:1304.6689Physical Review LettersMay 23, 201464 citations

Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman

Robert B. Griffiths

This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)

arXiv:2310.05968Sep 23, 20230 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Direct counterfactual transmission of a quantum state’”

Zheng-Hong Li, M. Al-Amri, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

We address criticisms made in the preceding Comment by Vaidman regarding our claims of counterfactuality of transmission of a quantum state in our recent work.Received 4 April 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.066302©2016 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJun 2, 201612 citations

Comment on “Direct counterfactual transmission of a quantum state”

Lev Vaidman A

The protocol for counterfactual transmission of a qubit [Z.-H. Li et al., Phys. Rev. A 92, 052315 (2015)] relies on the counterfactuality of transmissions of bit 1 and of bit 0. Since counterfactuality of transmission of bit 0 is not established, the claim of counterfactuality of transmission of a quantum state is not established too.

arXiv:1511.06615Physical Review AJun 2, 201627 citations

Reply to "Comment on 'Strong Measurements Give a Better Direct Measurement of the Quantum Wave Function' "

Giuseppe Vallone, Daniele Dequal

This is the reply to [arXiv:1711.00764], in which the authors claim that there is crucial normalization error in PRL 116, 040502 (2016) and that some quantities appearing in the method of PRL 116, 040502 (2016) are not experimentally measurable. We show that the claim of [arXiv:1711.00764] is not correct and that the quantities appearing in PRL 116, 040502 (2016) can be measured.

arXiv:1711.02055Nov 6, 20170 citations

Reply to "Comment to 'The laws of physics do not prohibit counterfactual communication'"

H Salih, Jonte R. Hance, W McCutcheon +1 more

Jun 10, 20250 citations