摘要本文提出一个关于能量、光与质能关系的全新元模型本体论框架。框架以“万物皆动”为第一公理,以“时间=度量状态变化的标尺”为认识论锚点,构建“连接-稳定性”(C-H-P)动力学体系。在此框架下,能量不再是标量,而是运动的投影;光被还原为“纯动态能量流(P)”;质能方程E=mc² 中的c² 被证明为“人类以光速为参照系进行测量时,为了消解方向性而作出的数学操作痕迹”。光子被重新定位为“能量流与探测器耦合时涌现的离散化现象”。基于此框架,本文提出一个低成本、判决性的实验方案——“结构几何耦合实验”,用以彻底验证光的本体论归属,并终结物理学界长达百年的“波粒二象性”范畴谬误。关键词:万物皆动;能量本体论;质能方程;波粒二象性;连接-稳定性;判决性实验 [Version Declaration / 版本声明]本预印本包含中文与英文两个版本。中文版本为原始创作版本,英文版本为翻译版本。由于翻译过程中可能存在语义损耗或细微偏差,若中英文版本在解读上出现任何歧义或冲突,请以中文版本作为最终权威依据。本文的全部核心思想、逻辑框架与推导均由作者独立提出。 AbstractThis paper proposes a novel ontological framework for energy and light, grounded in the first axiom that”all things are in motion” and anchored in the epistemological principle that ”time is the measure ofstate change.” A ”connection-stability” (C-H-P) dynamical system is constructed. Within this framework, energy is redefined as a product of the reorganization of connection modes. In its purely dynamicmode, energy is ontologically identical to velocity itself. Light is defined as the directional flow of puredynamic energy. Mass is interpreted as a measure of structural lock-energy. Mass-energy conversion isreduced to the release of structural lock-energy into dynamic velocity energy. The photon is repositionedas an emergent discrete phenomenon arising from the coupling between light and matter, rather than asthe ontological essence of light. Based on this framework, a low-cost, decisive experimental scheme—the”Structural Geometric Coupling Experiment”—is proposed to thoroughly verify the ontological attribution of light and to end the century-long ”wave-particle duality” categorical fallacy in physics.Keywords: all things are in motion; ontology of energy; mass-energy equation; wave-particle duality;connection-stability; decisive experiment [Version and Language Declaration]This preprint includes both Chinese and English versions. The Chinese version is the original text, and the English version is a translation. In the event of any semantic discrepancies, ambiguities, or conflicts between the two versions, the Chinese version shall prevail as the authoritative reference. All core ideas, logical frameworks, and derivations were independently conceived and proposed by the author.
Abstract The Environmental Attribute Theory (EAT, 环境属性理论) attributes the root of physical motion to the attribute response (属性响应) of objects to the imbalance of the environmental medium field (环境介质场), and force is an a posteriori measure (后验度量) of this response rather than the cause of motion. Based on the EAT framework, this paper systematically discusses two interrelated core propositions: First, the origin of statistical description in physics lies in cognitive informational incompleteness (认知信息不完备), rather than intrinsic randomness (内禀随机性) of nature. Starting from Lin Haibing's Second Law (林海兵第二定律), this paper points out that the necessary and sufficient conditions for determinism of motion are that the initial conditions are knowable and the time evolution of environmental parameters is knowable. Macroscopic objects satisfy these two conditions, so their trajectories are determinate; microscopic particles (electrons, molecules, etc.) have extremely small masses and cannot smooth out high-frequency perturbations of the environmental medium field (density fluctuations, temperature fluctuations, electromagnetic fluctuations, etc.), and the initial conditions and evolution processes of these microscopic fluctuations are in principle not completely knowable, so statistical description must be adopted. The velocity fluctuation variance (速度涨落方差) ⟨∣Δv∣2⟩∝1/m2 reveals dimensionally the suppression mechanism of mass on random effects. Statistical distributions (Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, 麦克斯韦-玻尔兹曼分布; diffraction patterns, 衍射图样, etc.) are optimal descriptions under conditions of informational incompleteness, rather than fundamental features of natural law. Second, electron diffraction phenomena can be given a deterministic explanation (决定论解释) without introducing wave-particle duality (波粒二象性). This paper proposes the "electron cloud network structure" (电子云网络结构) model: in crystals or solid materials, the extranuclear electron clouds of adjacent atoms couple through the Dianxon medium field (电性子介质场) to form a spatially periodic network structure; incident electrons, subject to Coulomb repulsion, preferentially pass through the grid gaps where the electron cloud density is lower; the statistical cumulative distribution of a large number of electrons is the diffraction pattern, whose mathematical form is equivalent to the squared modulus of the Fourier transform of the permeability function (通透性函数) P(r), naturally yielding the single-slit diffraction formula I(θ)∝(sinβ/β)2, the double-slit interference factor cos2(πdsinθ/λ), and the Bragg condition for crystal diffraction kout−kin=G. This explanation dissolves the paradox of "an electron passing through two slits simultaneously," requires no concept of wave function collapse (波函数坍缩), and restores the deterministic picture of physics. This paper further lists four testable experimental predictions (可检验的实验预言): the dependence of diffraction patterns on the composition of edge materials, the modulation of diffraction patterns by temperature, the reduction of diffraction blurring by environmental shielding, and the repeatability of single-electron landing positions under extreme conditions. These predictions differ fundamentally from the expectations of orthodox quantum mechanics (正统量子力学), forming the basis for decisive experiments (判决性实验). EAT covers the same experimental facts with fewer ontological assumptions (本体论假设) (no wave-particle duality, no collapse, no intrinsic randomness), providing an alternative, deterministic causal explanatory framework (决定论因果解释框架) for understanding quantum phenomena. Keywords: Environmental Attribute Theory (环境属性理论); origin of statistics (统计起源); determinism (决定论); electron diffraction (电子衍射); electron cloud network structure (电子云网络结构); informational incompleteness (信息不完备); wave-particle duality (波粒二象性)