arXiv:quant-ph/0206087

Reply to: Comment on "Quantum Optimization for Combinatorial Searches"

Carlo A. Trugenberger

Published Jun 13, 2002• 0 citations

Abstract

This is my reply to Zalka and Brun's criticism of my recent paper on quantum optimization heuristics. Essentially, this criticism is shown to be utterly irrelevant.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0206087

Related papers

Comment on `Quantum optimization for combinatorial searches'

Christof Zalka, Todd A. Brun

A recent paper by Trugenberger ( C A Trugenberger 2002 New J. Phys. 4 26 ) is commented on.

arXiv:quant-ph/0206081New Journal of PhysicsSep 3, 20021 citation

COMMENT: Comment on `Quantum optimization for combinatorial searches'

Christof Zalka, Todd A. Brun

New Journal of PhysicsSep 1, 20020 citations

Reply to: Inability of a graph neural network heuristic to outperform greedy algorithms in solving combinatorial optimization problems

Martin J. A. Schuetz, John Kyle Brubaker, Helmut G. Katzgraber

arXiv:2303.12096Nature Machine IntelligenceDec 30, 20221 citation

Reply to Ernest Nagel's Criticism of My Views on Quantum Mechanics

Hans Reichenbach

The Journal of PhilosophyApr 25, 19468 citations

Reply to comment on ‘Faithful teleportation of an unknown atomic state and a cavity field entangled state without Bell-state measurement’

Zhen‐Biao Yang

I give a reply to the comment by Cardoso et al on my recent paper (Yang Z-B 2006 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39 603).

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical PhysicsFeb 20, 20070 citations

Efetov, Pépin, and Meier Reply:

K. B. Efetov, C. Pépin, Hannes Meier

It is shown that the criticism presented in the Comment by Galanakis et al \cite{1} on the paper by Efetov et al \cite{2} is irrelevant to the bosonization approach.

arXiv:1001.1626Physical Review LettersOct 5, 20108 citations