© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

The Journal of Philosophy

Reply to Ernest Nagel's Criticism of My Views on Quantum Mechanics

Hans Reichenbach

Published Apr 25, 1946• 8 citations

DOI: 10.2307/2019124

Related papers

Ernest Nagel on Determinism as a Guiding Principle and Its Compatibility with Quantum Mechanics

Marij van Strien

Logic, epistemology, and the unity of science•Sep 21, 2021•0 citations

A critique of Mohrhoff's interpretation of quantum mechanics

Afshin Shafiee, Maryam Jafar-Aghdami, Mehdi Golshani

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Mar 14, 2006•1 citation

A remark on the interpretation of quantum mechanics

F. Ghaboussi

Physics Letters A•Oct 1, 1985•1 citation

Putting the Cart Before the Horse: Ernest Nagel and the Uncertainty Principle

David Atkinson, Jeanne Peijnenburg

Logic, epistemology, and the unity of science•Sep 21, 2021•0 citations

Is Relational Quantum Mechanics about Facts? If So, Whose? A Reply to Di Biagio and Rovelli's Comment on Brukner and Pienaar

Blake C. Stacey

Brukner and Pienaar have critiqued the Relational Quantum Mechanics of Rovelli, and together with Di Biagio, the latter has replied. I point out a few places where, in my view, that reply needs clarification.

arXiv:2112.07830•Dec 15, 2021•1 citation

On some alleged difficulties in the interpretation of quantum mechanics

Dennis Dieks

Synthese•Jan 1, 1991•14 citations