Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Logic, epistemology, and the unity of science

Ernest Nagel on Determinism as a Guiding Principle and Its Compatibility with Quantum Mechanics

Marij van Strien

Published Sep 21, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-81010-8_8

Related papers

Reply to Ernest Nagel's Criticism of My Views on Quantum Mechanics

Hans Reichenbach

The Journal of Philosophy•Apr 25, 1946•8 citations

Determinism and Quantum Mechanics

Grete Hermann

Studies in history and philosophy of science•Jan 1, 2016•8 citations

Putting the Cart Before the Horse: Ernest Nagel and the Uncertainty Principle

David Atkinson, Jeanne Peijnenburg

Logic, epistemology, and the unity of science•Sep 21, 2021•0 citations

Causation, realism, determinism, and probability in the science and philosophy of Max Born

Thomas Bunce

In this thesis I will examine the philosophy of the physicist Max Born (1882-1970). As well as his scientific work, Born wrote on a number of philosophical topics: causation, realism, determinism, and probability. They appear as an interest throughout his career, but he particularly concentrates on them from the 1940s onwards. Born is a significant figure in the development of quantum mechanics whose philosophical work has been left largely unexamined. It is the aim of this thesis to elucidate and to critically examine that work. I will give a defence of presentist historiography in the history and philosophy of science and a (relatively) brief biography of Born. With regards to causation, the thesis will argue that he holds that there exist principles regarding causal relations that have guided the development of physics and have, in the modern formulation of the subject, been confirmed as having an empirical status. I will argue that he is a selective realist, initially with regards to invariant properties and, later on, a structural realist. With regards to determinism, I will argue that Born has produced an argument, compatible with modern philosophical definitions of determinism, that we were never entitled to conclude from the success of classical mechanics that the world was deterministic. Finally, I will argue that Born holds an objective interpretation of probabilities in quantum mechanics which, due to his strong belief in the physical reality of quantum-mechanical probabilities and his apparent disbelief in the superposition of the wave-function, is most likely a long-run propensity theory.

•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Determinism and Quantum Mechanics(1954)

Paul K. Feyerabend

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 17, 2015•1 citation

Determinism and Quantum Mechanics : some proposed tests

Ramón Lapiedra, Armando Pérez

•Oct 26, 2010•0 citations
In this thesis I will examine the philosophy of the physicist Max Born (1882-1970). As well as his scientific work, Born wrote on a number of philosophical topics: causation, realism, determinism, and probability. They appear as an interest throughout his career, but he particularly concentrates on them from the 1940s onwards. Born is a significant figure in the development of quantum mechanics whose philosophical work has been left largely unexamined. It is the aim of this thesis to elucidate and to critically examine that work. I will give a defence of presentist historiography in the history and philosophy of science and a (relatively) brief biography of Born. With regards to causation, the thesis will argue that he holds that there exist principles regarding causal relations that have guided the development of physics and have, in the modern formulation of the subject, been confirmed as having an empirical status. I will argue that he is a selective realist, initially with regards to invariant properties and, later on, a structural realist. With regards to determinism, I will argue that Born has produced an argument, compatible with modern philosophical definitions of determinism, that we were never entitled to conclude from the success of classical mechanics that the world was deterministic. Finally, I will argue that Born holds an objective interpretation of probabilities in quantum mechanics which, due to his strong belief in the physical reality of quantum-mechanical probabilities and his apparent disbelief in the superposition of the wave-function, is most likely a long-run propensity theory.