Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2303.12096 · Nature Machine Intelligence

Reply to: Inability of a graph neural network heuristic to outperform greedy algorithms in solving combinatorial optimization problems

Martin J. A. Schuetz, John Kyle Brubaker, Helmut G. Katzgraber

Published Dec 30, 2022• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1038/s42256-022-00588-z

Related papers

Reusability report: A distributed strategy for solving combinatorial optimization problems with hypergraph neural networks

Xiaodi Li, Jianfeng Gui, Wei Xue +5 more

Nature Machine Intelligence•Nov 19, 2025•4 citations

Graph neural networks and the energetic cavity method for combinatorial optimization

Joe Bacchus George, George T. Cantwell

We study the use of graph neural networks (GNNs) for finding approximate ground states of Ising models. Efficiently finding these ground states is of broad significance because many combinatorial optimization problems can be formulated as an Ising model with the appropriate choice of couplings and fields. Exactly solving these problems is hard but there are many good heuristic methods. A lineage of these heuristics build from mean-field approximations: one approach uses the leading eigenvector of an appropriately defined matrix, another is the min-sum algorithm, also known as the energetic cavity method. Without modification, GNNs perform worse than both of these methods. We consider small modifications to the GNN to incorporate these heuristics and find that this considerably improves performance. While the modified approach is competitive against other deep-learning approaches, we still find that simulated annealing is reliably at least as good as deep learning methods for the same computational cost.

arXiv:2609.07456•Sep 7, 2026•0 citations

Probing Neural Combinatorial Optimization Models

Zhiqin Zhang, Yining Ma, Zhiguang Cao +1 more

neural information processing systems•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Combinatorial optimization with physics-inspired graph neural networks

Martin J. A. Schuetz, John Kyle Brubaker, Helmut G. Katzgraber

arXiv:2107.01188•Nature Machine Intelligence•Apr 21, 2022•207 citations

Combinatorial Optimization with Automated Graph Neural Networks

Yang Liu, Peng Zhang, Yang Gao +3 more

In recent years, graph neural networks (GNNs) have become increasingly popular for solving NP-hard combinatorial optimization (CO) problems, such as maximum cut and maximum independent set. The core idea behind these methods is to represent a CO problem as a graph and then use GNNs to learn the node/graph embedding with combinatorial information. Although these methods have achieved promising results, given a specific CO problem, the design of GNN architectures still requires heavy manual work with domain knowledge. Existing automated GNNs are mostly focused on traditional graph learning problems, which is inapplicable to solving NP-hard CO problems. To this end, we present a new class of \textbf{AUTO}mated \textbf{G}NNs for solving \textbf{NP}-hard problems, namely \textbf{AutoGNP}. We represent CO problems by GNNs and focus on two specific problems, i.e., mixed integer linear programming and quadratic unconstrained binary optimization. The idea of AutoGNP is to use graph neural architecture search algorithms to automatically find the best GNNs for a given NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem. Compared with existing graph neural architecture search algorithms, AutoGNP utilizes two-hop operators in the architecture search space. Moreover, AutoGNP utilizes simulated annealing and a strict early stopping policy to avoid local optimal solutions. Empirical results on benchmark combinatorial problems demonstrate the superiority of our proposed model.

arXiv:2406.02872•Jun 5, 2024•2 citations

Graph neural network initialisation of quantum approximate optimisation

Nishant Jain, Brian Coyle, Elham Kashefi +1 more

Approximate combinatorial optimisation has emerged as one of the most promising application areas for quantum computers, particularly those in the near term. In this work, we focus on the quantum approximate optimisation algorithm (QAOA) for solving the MaxCut problem. Specifically, we address two problems in the QAOA, how to initialise the algorithm, and how to subsequently train the parameters to find an optimal solution. For the former, we propose graph neural networks (GNNs) as a warm-starting technique for QAOA. We demonstrate that merging GNNs with QAOA can outperform both approaches individually. Furthermore, we demonstrate how graph neural networks enables warm-start generalisation across not only graph instances, but also to increasing graph sizes, a feature not straightforwardly available to other warm-starting methods. For training the QAOA, we test several optimisers for the MaxCut problem up to 16 qubits and benchmark against vanilla gradient descent. These include quantum aware/agnostic and machine learning based/neural optimisers. Examples of the latter include reinforcement and meta-learning. With the incorporation of these initialisation and optimisation toolkits, we demonstrate how the optimisation problems can be solved using QAOA in an end-to-end differentiable pipeline.

arXiv:2111.03016•Quantum•Nov 17, 2022•49 citations
We study the use of graph neural networks (GNNs) for finding approximate ground states of Ising models. Efficiently finding these ground states is of broad significance because many combinatorial optimization problems can be formulated as an Ising model with the appropriate choice of couplings and fields. Exactly solving these problems is hard but there are many good heuristic methods. A lineage of these heuristics build from mean-field approximations: one approach uses the leading eigenvector of an appropriately defined matrix, another is the min-sum algorithm, also known as the energetic cavity method. Without modification, GNNs perform worse than both of these methods. We consider small modifications to the GNN to incorporate these heuristics and find that this considerably improves performance. While the modified approach is competitive against other deep-learning approaches, we still find that simulated annealing is reliably at least as good as deep learning methods for the same computational cost.
In recent years, graph neural networks (GNNs) have become increasingly popular for solving NP-hard combinatorial optimization (CO) problems, such as maximum cut and maximum independent set. The core idea behind these methods is to represent a CO problem as a graph and then use GNNs to learn the node/graph embedding with combinatorial information. Although these methods have achieved promising results, given a specific CO problem, the design of GNN architectures still requires heavy manual work with domain knowledge. Existing automated GNNs are mostly focused on traditional graph learning problems, which is inapplicable to solving NP-hard CO problems. To this end, we present a new class of \textbf{AUTO}mated \textbf{G}NNs for solving \textbf{NP}-hard problems, namely \textbf{AutoGNP}. We represent CO problems by GNNs and focus on two specific problems, i.e., mixed integer linear programming and quadratic unconstrained binary optimization. The idea of AutoGNP is to use graph neural architecture search algorithms to automatically find the best GNNs for a given NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem. Compared with existing graph neural architecture search algorithms, AutoGNP utilizes two-hop operators in the architecture search space. Moreover, AutoGNP utilizes simulated annealing and a strict early stopping policy to avoid local optimal solutions. Empirical results on benchmark combinatorial problems demonstrate the superiority of our proposed model.
Approximate combinatorial optimisation has emerged as one of the most promising application areas for quantum computers, particularly those in the near term. In this work, we focus on the quantum approximate optimisation algorithm (QAOA) for solving the MaxCut problem. Specifically, we address two problems in the QAOA, how to initialise the algorithm, and how to subsequently train the parameters to find an optimal solution. For the former, we propose graph neural networks (GNNs) as a warm-starting technique for QAOA. We demonstrate that merging GNNs with QAOA can outperform both approaches individually. Furthermore, we demonstrate how graph neural networks enables warm-start generalisation across not only graph instances, but also to increasing graph sizes, a feature not straightforwardly available to other warm-starting methods. For training the QAOA, we test several optimisers for the MaxCut problem up to 16 qubits and benchmark against vanilla gradient descent. These include quantum aware/agnostic and machine learning based/neural optimisers. Examples of the latter include reinforcement and meta-learning. With the incorporation of these initialisation and optimisation toolkits, we demonstrate how the optimisation problems can be solved using QAOA in an end-to-end differentiable pipeline.