Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0406751 · Physical Review Letters

Stace and Barrett Reply:

Thomas M. Stace, S. D. Barrett

Published Feb 16, 2005• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We reply to a comment by Averin and Korotkov http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0404549 on Stace and Barrett, PRL 92, 136802 (2004) http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v92/e136802, showing that their specific criticisms are unfounded, and clarifying some of our results.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.94.069702

Related papers

Reply to the comment by C.Camacho on PRL, v.77, p.5433

Alexander Gutin, Victor Abkevich, Eugene I. Shakhnovich

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

arXiv:cond-mat/9703230•Mar 26, 1997•0 citations

Mashhoon replies

Bahram Mashhoon

URL: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3812 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3812 Response to: J. Anandan, preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3809 (1992).

Physical Review Letters•Jun 22, 1992•36 citations

Reply to the correspondence of Drummond and Brand [arXiv:1610.07633]

Kaspar Sakmann, Mark A. Kasevich

In their correspondence [arXiv:1610.07633] Drummond and Brand criticize our work [Nature Physics 12, 451-454 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys3631]. We show that their criticism is misleading and unfounded.

arXiv:1702.01211•Feb 4, 2017•2 citations

Mostovoy Replies:

MAXIM V. MOSTOVOY

A Reply to the Comment by M. Kenzelmann and A. B. Harris. Received 4 December 2006 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.089702 ©2008 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 26, 2008•4 citations

Faugeraset al.Reply:

C. Faugeras, Gérard Martinez, Yu. A. Bychkov

A Reply to the Comment by S. N. Klimin and J. T. Devreese.Received 13 August 2004DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.239702©2005 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jun 15, 2005•4 citations

Reply to comment by S.-K. Yip cond-mat/0611426

Ryan Barnett, Ari M. Turner, Eugene Demler

We respond to S.-K. Yip's criticism of our work on the classification of spinor condensates. We explain why his criticism is unfounded, emphasizing that the phases he mentions have been addressed in our paper cond-mat/0611230. To provide a constructive aspect to this response, we use it as an opportunity to show how our classification scheme makes explicit not only spin rotations which leave spinor states invariant, but also the phase factors which need to accompany them.

arXiv:cond-mat/0612099•Dec 4, 2006•1 citation
We reply to a comment by Averin and Korotkov http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0404549 on Stace and Barrett, PRL 92, 136802 (2004) http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v92/e136802, showing that their specific criticisms are unfounded, and clarifying some of our results.