Physical Review Letters

Mashhoon replies

Bahram Mashhoon

Published Jun 22, 1992• 36 citations

Abstract

URL: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3812 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3812 Response to: J. Anandan, preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3809 (1992).

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.68.3812

Related papers

Nayak Replies:

Chetan Nayak

A Reply to the Comment by Masaki Oshikawa.Received 9 December 2002DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.199702

Physical Review LettersNov 5, 20031 citation

Zhanget al.Reply:

G. P. Zhang, T. A. Callcott, G. T. Woods +4 more

A Reply to the Comment by Michel van Veenendaal and A. J. Fedro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 219701 (2004).Received 7 November 2003DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.219702©2004 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersMay 26, 20045 citations

Mostovoy Replies:

MAXIM V. MOSTOVOY

Physical Review LettersFeb 26, 20084 citations

Comment on “Efimov States for H4e Trimers?”

Brett D. Esry, C. D. Lin, Chris H. Greene +1 more

A Comment on the Letter by T. González-Lezana, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1648 (1999). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 6 May 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4189©2001 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersApr 30, 20017 citations

Comment on “Superconductivity in the Two-Dimensional t− J Model”

Ting-Kuo Lee, C. T. Shih, Y. C. Chen +1 more

A Comment on the Letter by S. Sorella et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 117002 (2002).. The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 12 April 2002DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.279702©2002 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersDec 19, 200216 citations

Shastry Replies:

B. Sriram Shastry

Physical Review LettersJan 10, 201210 citations