Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1702.01211

Reply to the correspondence of Drummond and Brand [arXiv:1610.07633]

Kaspar Sakmann, Mark A. Kasevich

Published Feb 4, 2017• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In their correspondence [arXiv:1610.07633] Drummond and Brand criticize our work [Nature Physics 12, 451-454 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys3631]. We show that their criticism is misleading and unfounded.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1702.01211

Related papers

Li et al. Reply:

Xin Li, Sooran Kim, Xi Chen +1 more

This Reply to preceding Comment of arXiv:1909.09867 shows why the statements in the Comment are misleading. We point out that our physical picture and theirs are fundamentally different, therefore the claim of using their correlation to include ours shows a very limited physical relevance, which instead may impede the precise understanding of either of the two pictures.

arXiv:2003.03992•Physical Review Letters•Mar 12, 2020•13 citations

Mostovoy Replies:

MAXIM V. MOSTOVOY

A Reply to the Comment by M. Kenzelmann and A. B. Harris. Received 4 December 2006 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.089702 ©2008 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 26, 2008•4 citations

Ishizakaet al.Reply:

K. Ishizaka, Ritsuko Eguchi, S. Tsuda +13 more

A Reply to the Comment by J. D. Lee et al..Received 22 April 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.199702©2009 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 13, 2009•0 citations

Benassiet al.Reply

P. Benassi, Michael H. Krisch, C. Masciovecchio +5 more

A Reply to the Comment by M. Foret, et al.Received 10 December 1996DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4670©1997 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jun 16, 1997•21 citations

Enderleet al.Reply:

M. Enderle, B. Fåk, H.-J. Mikeska +1 more

A Reply to the Comment by S.-L. Drechsler et al.Received 7 January 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.219702© 2011 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 25, 2011•10 citations

Scopignoet al.Reply:

T. Scopigno, Roberta Angelini, Giancarlo Ruocco +1 more

A Reply to the Comment by E. Courtens et al..Received 6 September 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.079604©2007 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 13, 2007•3 citations
In their correspondence [arXiv:1610.07633] Drummond and Brand criticize our work [Nature Physics 12, 451-454 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys3631]. We show that their criticism is misleading and unfounded.