arXiv:cond-mat/9703230

Reply to the comment by C.Camacho on PRL, v.77, p.5433

Alexander Gutin, Victor Abkevich, Eugene I. Shakhnovich

Published Mar 26, 1997• 0 citations

arXiv HTML PDF

Abstract

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/9703230

Related papers

Remarks on reply to Johansen's comment

Anders Sewerin Johansen

Remarks on reply (cond-mat/0206368) to Johansen's comment (cond-mat/0205249)

arXiv:cond-mat/0206479Jun 25, 20022 citations

Hove and Sudbø Reply:

J. Hove, Asle Sudbø

A short Reply to the Comment of Prokof'ev and Svistunov, cond-mat/0504008, is given.

arXiv:cond-mat/0506023Physical Review LettersJun 1, 20063 citations

Henkel and Pleimling Reply:

Malte Henkel, Michel Pleimling

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

arXiv:cond-mat/0302295Physical Review LettersMar 6, 200318 citations

Reply to the comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

D. H. E. Gross, E. V. Votyakov, Alessandro De Martino

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

arXiv:cond-mat/0304013Apr 1, 20030 citations

Stace and Barrett Reply:

Thomas M. Stace, S. D. Barrett

We reply to a comment by Averin and Korotkov http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0404549 on Stace and Barrett, PRL 92, 136802 (2004) http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v92/e136802, showing that their specific criticisms are unfounded, and clarifying some of our results.

arXiv:cond-mat/0406751Physical Review LettersFeb 16, 20057 citations

Reply to the Comment of E. A. Cornell

Erling Riis, S. M. Barnett

Europhysics Letters (EPL)Jun 1, 19953 citations