arXiv:cond-mat/0506023 · Physical Review Letters

Hove and Sudbø Reply:

J. Hove, Asle Sudbø

Published Jun 1, 2006• 3 citations

arXiv HTML PDF

Abstract

A short Reply to the Comment of Prokof'ev and Svistunov, cond-mat/0504008, is given.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.96.219702

Related papers

Remarks on reply to Johansen's comment

Anders Sewerin Johansen

Remarks on reply (cond-mat/0206368) to Johansen's comment (cond-mat/0205249)

arXiv:cond-mat/0206479Jun 25, 20022 citations

Reply to the comment by C.Camacho on PRL, v.77, p.5433

Alexander Gutin, Victor Abkevich, Eugene I. Shakhnovich

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

arXiv:cond-mat/9703230Mar 26, 19970 citations

Henkel and Pleimling Reply:

Malte Henkel, Michel Pleimling

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

arXiv:cond-mat/0302295Physical Review LettersMar 6, 200318 citations

Reply to the comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

D. H. E. Gross, E. V. Votyakov, Alessandro De Martino

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

arXiv:cond-mat/0304013Apr 1, 20030 citations

Zhouet al.Reply:

Qi Zhou, Yasuyuki Kato, Naoki Kawashima +1 more

Physical Review LettersNov 4, 20107 citations

Jönsson, Yoshino, and Nordblad Reply:

Petra E. Jönsson, Hajime Yoshino, П. Нордблад

Reply to the Comment by L. Berthier and J.-P. Bouchaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 059701 (2003), also cond-mat/0209165, on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097201 (2002), also cond-mat/0203444

arXiv:cond-mat/0209385Physical Review LettersFeb 6, 200316 citations