Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

求实

跳出爱因斯坦与玻尔的思辨圈──读王天思《在过去和未来之间──决定性与非决定性》

胡以申

Published Jan 1, 1996• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

跳出爱因斯坦与玻尔的思辨圈──读王天思《在过去和未来之间──决定性与非决定性》胡以申在本世纪的哲学、科学领域.大约没有比爱因斯坦与玻尔之间那场关于“决定论”命运的“世纪之争”更吸引人的了。两位大师的观点是如此地对立,爱因斯坦坚信“决定论”,认为上帝绝...

Related papers

统计方法·物理学·决定论

李浙生

概率统计方法是应用非常广泛的数学工具。它在物理学中的应用造成了对严格决定论的猛烈冲击。十九世纪物理学家用它成功地解释了热现象的不可逆性。这表明严格决定论,并非描述自然现象的唯一有效方法,同时它还剥夺了规律的严格性。这是对严格决定论的第一次冲击。20世纪物理学家发现,量子力学的统计性质不是由于理论的不完备,而是由于量子效应本身具有不确定性。

南京大学学报:哲学.人文科学.社会科学•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

评所谓“对主客体不可分割性的再认识”——与柳树滋同志商榷

何祚庥

(一) 我们是否需要对“主体与客体的不可分割的同格(即相互关联)”再认识? 甲:近来,我读到了柳树滋同志所撰写的《微观测量与量子力学的人类学特征》(《自然辩证法通讯》,1990年,第2期,以下简称《特征》)一文,这一文章认为:“经典物理学的概念能够反映物质客体的纯本体论结构”,而在量子力学中,“通过测不准关系,……我

高校理论战线•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

环境属性理论视角下的物理学统计来源与电子衍射现象

海兵 林

Abstract The Environmental Attribute Theory (EAT, 环境属性理论) attributes the root of physical motion to the attribute response (属性响应) of objects to the imbalance of the environmental medium field (环境介质场), and force is an a posteriori measure (后验度量) of this response rather than the cause of motion. Based on the EAT framework, this paper systematically discusses two interrelated core propositions: First, the origin of statistical description in physics lies in cognitive informational incompleteness (认知信息不完备), rather than intrinsic randomness (内禀随机性) of nature. Starting from Lin Haibing's Second Law (林海兵第二定律), this paper points out that the necessary and sufficient conditions for determinism of motion are that the initial conditions are knowable and the time evolution of environmental parameters is knowable. Macroscopic objects satisfy these two conditions, so their trajectories are determinate; microscopic particles (electrons, molecules, etc.) have extremely small masses and cannot smooth out high-frequency perturbations of the environmental medium field (density fluctuations, temperature fluctuations, electromagnetic fluctuations, etc.), and the initial conditions and evolution processes of these microscopic fluctuations are in principle not completely knowable, so statistical description must be adopted. The velocity fluctuation variance (速度涨落方差) $\langle |\Delta \vec{v}|^2 \rangle \propto 1/m^2$ reveals dimensionally the suppression mechanism of mass on random effects. Statistical distributions (Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, 麦克斯韦-玻尔兹曼分布; diffraction patterns, 衍射图样, etc.) are optimal descriptions under conditions of informational incompleteness, rather than fundamental features of natural law. Second, electron diffraction phenomena can be given a deterministic explanation (决定论解释) without introducing wave-particle duality (波粒二象性). This paper proposes the "electron cloud network structure" (电子云网络结构) model: in crystals or solid materials, the extranuclear electron clouds of adjacent atoms couple through the Dianxon medium field (电性子介质场) to form a spatially periodic network structure; incident electrons, subject to Coulomb repulsion, preferentially pass through the grid gaps where the electron cloud density is lower; the statistical cumulative distribution of a large number of electrons is the diffraction pattern, whose mathematical form is equivalent to the squared modulus of the Fourier transform of the permeability function (通透性函数) $P(\vec{r})$, naturally yielding the single-slit diffraction formula $I(\theta) \propto (\sin\beta/\beta)^2$, the double-slit interference factor $\cos^2(\pi d \sin\theta/\lambda)$, and the Bragg condition for crystal diffraction $\vec{k}_{\text{out}} - \vec{k}_{\text{in}} = \vec{G}$. This explanation dissolves the paradox of "an electron passing through two slits simultaneously," requires no concept of wave function collapse (波函数坍缩), and restores the deterministic picture of physics. This paper further lists four testable experimental predictions (可检验的实验预言): the dependence of diffraction patterns on the composition of edge materials, the modulation of diffraction patterns by temperature, the reduction of diffraction blurring by environmental shielding, and the repeatability of single-electron landing positions under extreme conditions. These predictions differ fundamentally from the expectations of orthodox quantum mechanics (正统量子力学), forming the basis for decisive experiments (判决性实验). EAT covers the same experimental facts with fewer ontological assumptions (本体论假设) (no wave-particle duality, no collapse, no intrinsic randomness), providing an alternative, deterministic causal explanatory framework (决定论因果解释框架) for understanding quantum phenomena. Keywords: Environmental Attribute Theory (环境属性理论); origin of statistics (统计起源); determinism (决定论); electron diffraction (电子衍射); electron cloud network structure (电子云网络结构); informational incompleteness (信息不完备); wave-particle duality (波粒二象性)

•Sep 23, 2026•0 citations

量子过程与思维过程的类比——《量子理论》述介

阎孟伟, 杨谦

很少有人把量子过程同思维过程联系起来。美国物理学家、量子理论的奠基者之一D.玻姆却在其《量子理论》(侯德彭译,商务印书馆1982年版)一著中出人意料地将这两个过程放在一起加以比较,指出这二者几乎“逐点类似”。这个比较看上去似乎别出心裁,但又确实发人深思。现将这个比较简要地呈于读者。(一)测不准原理与思维过程的不确定性测不准原理是量子理论的一个重要结论。在观测原子客体的量子状态时,由于观测原子仪器与原子客体间有着不可分割、不可完全控制的相互作用关系,原子客体的量子状态在实

哲学动态•Jan 1, 1987•0 citations

爱因斯坦—玻尔之争:不同竞技规则?

方在庆

爱因斯坦-玻尔之争:不同竞技规则?方在庆本世纪最伟大的两位物理学家爱因斯坦和玻尔之间的著名争论,长期以来一直是学术界关心的热门话题,一些人把年轻的爱因斯坦与年老的爱因斯坦迥然对立起来,认为爱因斯坦年轻时思想开放,而年老时却思想保守。〔1〕甚至有人认为...

自然辩证法研究•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations

因果性与统计关联:量子哲学的根本问题——《量子论与科学哲学的发展》要义发微

鲁品越

量子力学对经典实在论哲学思想提出了最巨大的挑战:物理学理论是关于客观实在的规律的知识,还是人类心灵的一种发明?世界的因果联系是事物本身所固有,还是我们主观范式强加于客观世界的精神产物?这些问题像梦魇一样困扰着科学家与哲学家。几乎所有的顶级科学家和哲学家;

Kexue jishu zhexue yanjiu•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations
跳出爱因斯坦与玻尔的思辨圈──读王天思《在过去和未来之间──决定性与非决定性》胡以申在本世纪的哲学、科学领域.大约没有比爱因斯坦与玻尔之间那场关于“决定论”命运的“世纪之争”更吸引人的了。两位大师的观点是如此地对立,爱因斯坦坚信“决定论”,认为上帝绝...
概率统计方法是应用非常广泛的数学工具。它在物理学中的应用造成了对严格决定论的猛烈冲击。十九世纪物理学家用它成功地解释了热现象的不可逆性。这表明严格决定论,并非描述自然现象的唯一有效方法,同时它还剥夺了规律的严格性。这是对严格决定论的第一次冲击。20世纪物理学家发现,量子力学的统计性质不是由于理论的不完备,而是由于量子效应本身具有不确定性。
Abstract The Environmental Attribute Theory (EAT, 环境属性理论) attributes the root of physical motion to the attribute response (属性响应) of objects to the imbalance of the environmental medium field (环境介质场), and force is an a posteriori measure (后验度量) of this response rather than the cause of motion. Based on the EAT framework, this paper systematically discusses two interrelated core propositions: First, the origin of statistical description in physics lies in cognitive informational incompleteness (认知信息不完备), rather than intrinsic randomness (内禀随机性) of nature. Starting from Lin Haibing's Second Law (林海兵第二定律), this paper points out that the necessary and sufficient conditions for determinism of motion are that the initial conditions are knowable and the time evolution of environmental parameters is knowable. Macroscopic objects satisfy these two conditions, so their trajectories are determinate; microscopic particles (electrons, molecules, etc.) have extremely small masses and cannot smooth out high-frequency perturbations of the environmental medium field (density fluctuations, temperature fluctuations, electromagnetic fluctuations, etc.), and the initial conditions and evolution processes of these microscopic fluctuations are in principle not completely knowable, so statistical description must be adopted. The velocity fluctuation variance (速度涨落方差) ⟨∣Δv⃗∣2⟩∝1/m2\langle |\Delta \vec{v}|^2 \rangle \propto 1/m^2⟨∣Δv∣2⟩∝1/m2 reveals dimensionally the suppression mechanism of mass on random effects. Statistical distributions (Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, 麦克斯韦-玻尔兹曼分布; diffraction patterns, 衍射图样, etc.) are optimal descriptions under conditions of informational incompleteness, rather than fundamental features of natural law. Second, electron diffraction phenomena can be given a deterministic explanation (决定论解释) without introducing wave-particle duality (波粒二象性). This paper proposes the "electron cloud network structure" (电子云网络结构) model: in crystals or solid materials, the extranuclear electron clouds of adjacent atoms couple through the Dianxon medium field (电性子介质场) to form a spatially periodic network structure; incident electrons, subject to Coulomb repulsion, preferentially pass through the grid gaps where the electron cloud density is lower; the statistical cumulative distribution of a large number of electrons is the diffraction pattern, whose mathematical form is equivalent to the squared modulus of the Fourier transform of the permeability function (通透性函数) P(r⃗)P(\vec{r})P(r), naturally yielding the single-slit diffraction formula I(θ)∝(sin⁡β/β)2I(\theta) \propto (\sin\beta/\beta)^2I(θ)∝(sinβ/β)2, the double-slit interference factor cos⁡2(πdsin⁡θ/λ)\cos^2(\pi d \sin\theta/\lambda)cos2(πdsinθ/λ), and the Bragg condition for crystal diffraction k⃗out−k⃗in=G⃗\vec{k}_{\text{out}} - \vec{k}_{\text{in}} = \vec{G}kout​−kin​=G. This explanation dissolves the paradox of "an electron passing through two slits simultaneously," requires no concept of wave function collapse (波函数坍缩), and restores the deterministic picture of physics. This paper further lists four testable experimental predictions (可检验的实验预言): the dependence of diffraction patterns on the composition of edge materials, the modulation of diffraction patterns by temperature, the reduction of diffraction blurring by environmental shielding, and the repeatability of single-electron landing positions under extreme conditions. These predictions differ fundamentally from the expectations of orthodox quantum mechanics (正统量子力学), forming the basis for decisive experiments (判决性实验). EAT covers the same experimental facts with fewer ontological assumptions (本体论假设) (no wave-particle duality, no collapse, no intrinsic randomness), providing an alternative, deterministic causal explanatory framework (决定论因果解释框架) for understanding quantum phenomena. Keywords: Environmental Attribute Theory (环境属性理论); origin of statistics (统计起源); determinism (决定论); electron diffraction (电子衍射); electron cloud network structure (电子云网络结构); informational incompleteness (信息不完备); wave-particle duality (波粒二象性)
很少有人把量子过程同思维过程联系起来。美国物理学家、量子理论的奠基者之一D.玻姆却在其《量子理论》(侯德彭译,商务印书馆1982年版)一著中出人意料地将这两个过程放在一起加以比较,指出这二者几乎“逐点类似”。这个比较看上去似乎别出心裁,但又确实发人深思。现将这个比较简要地呈于读者。(一)测不准原理与思维过程的不确定性测不准原理是量子理论的一个重要结论。在观测原子客体的量子状态时,由于观测原子仪器与原子客体间有着不可分割、不可完全控制的相互作用关系,原子客体的量子状态在实