This work develops Dynamical Informational Field Theory (DIFT), a field-theoretic framework in which physical observables emerge from admissible, low-impedance organizations of an underlying scalar–phase field rather than from fundamental particles or external measurement postulates. The paper introduces admissibility pathways as variational selection mechanisms connecting the full informational field to the observable sectors of quantum mechanics and the Standard Model. The framework derives Born weights, interference, current closure, and effective unitarity as consequences of dynamostatic organization and boundary memory. Measurement is interpreted as boundary-induced phase closure under finite impedance rather than as an independent collapse axiom. Numerical evidence includes scalar–phase simulations of double-slit interference, which-path decoherence, admissibility-edge dynamics, and toroidal organizational pathways relevant to nuclear emergence. The manuscript combines formal derivations, controlled numerical validations, and a systematic correspondence map between standard physical concepts and their DIFT interpretations, providing a unified admissibility-based ontology for quantum phenomena.
This work develops Dynamical Informational Field Theory (DIFT), a field-theoretic framework in which physical observables emerge from admissible, low-impedance organizations of an underlying scalar–phase field rather than from fundamental particles or external measurement postulates. The paper introduces admissibility pathways as variational selection mechanisms connecting the full informational field to the observable sectors of quantum mechanics and the Standard Model. The framework derives Born weights, interference, current closure, and effective unitarity as consequences of dynamostatic organization and boundary memory. Measurement is interpreted as boundary-induced phase closure under finite impedance rather than as an independent collapse axiom. Numerical evidence includes scalar–phase simulations of double-slit interference, which-path decoherence, admissibility-edge dynamics, and toroidal organizational pathways relevant to nuclear emergence. The manuscript combines formal derivations, controlled numerical validations, and a systematic correspondence map between standard physical concepts and their DIFT interpretations, providing a unified admissibility-based ontology for quantum phenomena.
This paper proposes a structural framework in which physical laws and quantum probability emerge from a common admissibility principle, rather than from the unification of dynamical equations.No new forces, fields, particles, or dynamical laws are introduced.Instead, a universal structural constraint governing which states are admissible as physically realizable is identified. Building on results established in Admissibility Frameworks I and II, the existence of a universal frame constant limiting allowable transitions is taken as a starting point.From this principle, an equation of existence is formulated, which does not describe time evolution but instead delineates the boundary between admissible and non-admissible states.Different physical interactions are shown to correspond to distinct structural interpretations of the same admissibility condition. Within this framework, quantum states are interpreted not as probability amplitudes but as admissibility distributions.Measurement is described as structural filtering at the admissibility boundary, rather than as a dynamical collapse process.Under minimal and physically natural assumptions—phase invariance, orthogonal additivity, and locality—the admissibility measure is shown to be uniquely quadratic, yielding the Born rule as a structural consequence rather than a postulate. The resulting theory reframes unification as the closure of existence conditions shared by all physical theories.Dynamics remain domain-specific, but admissibility is universal.In this sense, unification is achieved not by combining forces, but by identifying the single structural condition under which any physical state may exist. AI Usage Declaration: The core concepts and mathematical intuitions of this paper were conceived by the author (Byeong-Young Oh). The technical formalization of the mathematical framework and the English drafting process were performed in collaboration with Artificial Intelligence (AI) models. The author takes full responsibility for the contents and logical integrity of this work. This work is part of an ongoing independent research program. Official research index :https://jingyu-papa.github.io/publications/
Foundational problems in physics—including quantum measurement, spacetime emergence, gravitational dynamics, nonlocality, the arrow of time, and the status of physical existence—are typically addressed in isolation, via model-dependent extensions or interpretive assumptions. This work proposes a different approach. We introduce a constraint-based framework, the Closure Admissibility Principle (CAP), which specifies minimal structural conditions any physical description must satisfy in order to be globally consistent. CAP is formulated in operational terms, using admissibility of states, recoverability under refinement, and stability of closed records, without assuming spacetime, dynamics, or ontology a priori. We show that enforcing these constraints induces a unifying closure structure on law-space, from which several persistent foundational puzzles are resolved as structural consequences rather than postulates. In particular, collapse is reclassified as record selection, spacetime and gravity emerge only in compressible regimes, General Relativity appears as an infrared universality class rather than a fundamental law, singularities correspond to failures of admissible description, and null (“nothing”) models are excluded as inadmissible fixed points. The framework is explicitly falsifiable via operational and weak-field tests, and its scope and limits are stated precisely. The results suggest that many foundational paradoxes arise not from incomplete dynamics, but from admitting globally incoherent physical descriptions.
This work introduces a falsifiable symbolic field framework for modeling quantum-like behaviors under explicit structural constraints. Rather than modifying the formalism of quantum mechanics or proposing a new physical ontology, the paper investigates which behaviors associated with quantum systems persist within a restricted class of admissible dynamics—defined as bounded, well-posed, and stable under perturbation. At the core of the framework is a bounded nonlinear stabilizing function, KN, which constrains symbolic field evolution within a modular phase space. Within this constrained regime, phenomena commonly associated with quantum mechanics—interference, collapse-like transitions, entanglement, memory persistence, and decoherence—emerge as structural consequences of resonance, phase alignment, and admissibility filtering rather than as observer-dependent postulates. Using four simulation-based tests, the paper demonstrates that: Linear superposition fails under KN modulation, producing bounded asymmetry rather than cancellation. Symbolic memory decays without active modular reinforcement and persists only under feedback. Collapse-like transitions propagate synchronously across phase-aligned symbolic fields. Decoherence emerges from stochastic phase drift without invoking measurement or observation. The framework reframes collapse as resonance locking, entanglement as modular phase alignment, and decoherence as admissibility failure induced by phase instability. These mechanisms do not alter the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics, but instead clarify the structural conditions under which quantum-like behavior survives. This work is intended as a structural and methodological contribution, providing a constrained symbolic model that complements existing quantum theory and connects ideas from nonlinear dynamics, decoherence, and constructive field theory. It forms part of a broader research program exploring admissibility as a unifying principle across physical, symbolic, and informational systems.
Admissibility Physics — Quantum Structure from Finite Enforceability (Paper 5) This Zenodo community collects research outputs associated with Admissibility Physics, with primary focus on Paper 5 — Quantum Structure from Finite Enforceability and the derivation of quantum mechanics as an admissible representational regime. Paper 5 shows that the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics—Hilbert space, linearity, inner products, tensor products, unitary evolution, CPTP maps, and the Born rule—is not postulated, but forced by admissibility once coherent, jointly enforceable distinctions exist under finite correlation capacity. Quantum structure emerges as the unique bookkeeping required to represent interference, refinement, and recombination while preserving admissibility. The derivation does not assume probability, measurement postulates, dynamics, or spacetime geometry. Probability enters only as a secondary representation, with the Born rule arising uniquely from admissibility invariance and refinement consistency. Measurement is treated as a regime transition associated with saturation and record formation, not as a fundamental collapse mechanism. Quantum mechanics is shown to be conditionally valid: exact in regimes where coherence and non-saturation permit admissible composition, and structurally inapplicable where capacity is exhausted. Monogamy, entanglement limits, and decoherence follow from non-closure under composition and finite interface capacity, rather than from quantum axioms. All subsequent works in this community rely on the quantum-admissible representation established in Paper 5. Later papers show how variational dynamics and spacetime geometry arise as further conditional representations layered on top of quantum structure, and how quantum description itself fails at saturation boundaries, horizons, and measurement-like events. This community serves as a curated, citable archive centered on the derivation and limits of quantum structure within Admissibility Physics. Paper 5 functions as the representational keystone of the program: the point at which finite enforceability yields the quantum formalism without postulation. Core papers are frozen where noted; companion papers, mathematical appendices, figures, and computational artifacts document derivations, regime conditions, and testable consequences.
The standard Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics relies on a set of historically established, ad hoc postulates to describe particle-wave duality, measurement, and non-locality. In this paper, we propose a single foundational axiom that fully reproduces the standard mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics while eliminating the need for supplementary assumptions. From this singular postulate, we rigorously derive the fundamental origin of the wave function and the mathematical generator of the Schrödinger equation. Furthermore, we demonstrate via isomorfism that all seemingly inexplicable quantum phenomena—including wave-function collapse and quantum entanglement—are mathematically and conceptually reducible to the underlying dynamics of the double-slit experiment. By establishing a direct fundamental correlation between the double-slit interference mechanism and the Monty Hall phenomenon, we prove that these effects are distinct manifestations of the exact same principle. We framed the double-slit experiment as an interference of the space of possibilities affected by information and simetrys. Ultimately, by anchoring the existing quantum mathematical framework to this unique axiom, this work provides a coherent, paradox-free ontological foundation that resolves the interpretational crisis of quantum mechanics without altering its empirical predictive power.
The Scalar Temporal Field Ontology (STFO) treats time as a physical scalar field whose spacetime gradients define causal ordering and temporal directionality. While prior work established the classical dynamics and effective field theory structure of STFO, a consistent formulation of quantum mechanics requires that quantum evolution be defined without reference to an external time parameter. In this work quantum mechanics is derived as unitary evolution along the temporal scalar field itself. Using a covariant path integral formulation, Schrödinger evolution is shown to arise as a gauge-fixed description of dynamics along the normalized temporal congruence. Measurement and the emergence of classical behavior follow from controlled temporal decoherence induced by EFT-suppressed matter couplings. The framework preserves standard quantum mechanics in weak-field regimes while predicting small, environment-dependent deviations accessible to precision experiments.Note:Earlier unified formulations of the Scalar Temporal Field Ontology admit an intrinsic ultraviolet regularization through nonlinear temporal feedback that dynamically saturates stress–energy. In the present phenomenological and quantum analyses, we work explicitly in the controlled low-energy effective limit of this theory, where predictions can be extracted and compared to observations without invoking the full ultraviolet dynamics.