The size-ether dual medium model proposes an alternative explanation for the four fundamental interactions, the nature of light, and quantum randomness within the framework of classical mechanics, yet its core predictions remain to be experimentally verified. This paper designs four progressive crucial experiments: (1) an ultrasonic polarization experiment to verify that longitudinal waves can exhibit polarization characteristics; (2) a single-atom serial decay experiment with a strict single-chamber, single-trap, single-particle design to test whether decay is a collective emergent effect; (3) a Venus orbital gravitational constant measurement experiment to adjudicate between the medium gravity paradigm and the spacetime curvature paradigm; (4) a radio wave dual-mirror beam splitting experiment using mercury-plated mirrors to directly split the wavefront and test the divisibility of photons. The four experiments form a complete verification system from the dimensions of optics, nuclear physics, gravitation, and quantum properties, and the results can directly determine the rationality of the classical medium unified theory. (本文在英文正文后附有完整中文版,内容与结构完全一致。)
The size-ether dual medium model proposes an alternative explanation for the four fundamental interactions, the nature of light, and quantum randomness within the framework of classical mechanics, yet its core predictions remain to be experimentally verified. This paper designs four progressive crucial experiments: (1) an ultrasonic polarization experiment to verify that longitudinal waves can exhibit polarization characteristics; (2) a single-atom serial decay experiment with a strict single-chamber, single-trap, single-particle design to test whether decay is a collective emergent effect; (3) a Venus orbital gravitational constant measurement experiment to adjudicate between the medium gravity paradigm and the spacetime curvature paradigm; (4) a radio wave dual-mirror beam splitting experiment using mercury-plated mirrors to directly split the wavefront and test the divisibility of photons. The four experiments form a complete verification system from the dimensions of optics, nuclear physics, gravitation, and quantum properties, and the results can directly determine the rationality of the classical medium unified theory. (本文在英文正文后附有完整中文版,内容与结构完全一致。)
For over a century, quantum mechanics has been built upon four core intrinsic assumptions: wave-particle duality, microscopic uncertainty, quantum probability, and nonlocal entanglement. These four assumptions have shaped the modern worldview, holding that the microscopic world is inherently ambiguous, discontinuous, nonlocal, and probabilistic. However, this framework has always suffered from a fatal defect: it can fit experimental results but cannot provide a deterministic causal mechanism, and many core phenomena remain logically paradoxical. Based on the XLG cosmological elastic KuiQuark Sea medium and the helical motion of microscopic particles, this paper adopts the same unified physical rules and calibrated constants established in Papers XI and XII of this series. Without introducing new assumptions, fitting data, or invoking relativistic or quantum axioms, we complete a full representational reconstruction of quantum mechanics. We systematically demonstrate that all quantum phenomena are not fundamental properties of the universe, but arise from three classical mechanisms: elastic fluctuations of the KuiQuark Sea, the intrinsic helical trajectories of microscopic particles, and the geometric limitations of observational measurements. This paper deconstructs and reconstructs wave-particle duality, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, quantum tunneling, quantum entanglement, interference and diffraction, the ultraviolet cutoff of blackbody radiation, magneto-optical effects, spectral broadening, and redshift mechanisms. All quantum phenomena are reduced to local, causal, classical, and precisely describable medium dynamics and geometric mechanics. The ultimate conclusion is that the universe is a strictly deterministic classical medium system at its foundation. Quantum mechanics is a representational approximate theory formed by the superposition of human observational scale limitations and medium effects.
The Canadian photon splitting experiment on two photon polarization correlation has long been regarded by mainstream physics as important experimental evidence for quantum entanglement and spooky action at a distance. However, the underlying physical mechanism of this effect lacks corresponding descriptions of entity evolution processes, and existing explanations mostly rely on mathematical fitting. Based on the Light Origin Theory, this paper abandons non classical assumptions such as quantum superposition and quantum entanglement. By applying the scalpel like division mechanism of crystal lattices, the collision perturbation effect between photons and atomic lattices, and the conservation rule of polarization angle matching, this paper provides a complete physical interpretation for co polarized and orthogonally polarized distributions of twin photons. This paper establishes two fundamental optical criteria: first, photon energy rise fall, fusion and splitting must satisfy the precondition of consistent polarization angles; second, collisions between photons and material atoms can alter photon polarization angles. Based on the above mechanisms, this paper clarifies that only two stable polarization pairing modes exist after photon splitting. A thought experiment with a triangular prism optical path is designed to test the inference that atomic lattice collisions change photon polarization angles. This research revises partial theoretical deviations in traditional optics and provides a brand new classical entity based physical interpretation for the laws governing photon photon interactions.
The mainstream system of physics today is shackled by three major theoretical frameworks that fundamentally deviate from research rooted in matter and objective reality. All three are constructed based on abstract assumptions that contradict intuitive material motion and formal logic. First, the geometric metaphysical system derived from General Relativity, including spacetime curvature, Einstein’s field equations, extra dimensions, gravitational waves, black hole singularities, the Big Bang, dark matter, dark energy, spacetime distortion, wormholes and other related flawed propositions. This framework arbitrarily reinterprets gravitational effects of celestial bodies as unobservable geometric deformations of spacetime, and fabricates the concept of "gravitational waves" claimed to propagate at the speed of light. Quantitative calculations targeting the 1.3-billion-light-year black hole merger event prove that the field equations artificially set a mere 5% mass loss ratio. The calculated amplitude of gravitational fluctuations is tens of thousands of times larger than values derived from Newtonian mechanics consistent with real material transformation rules. This parameter is only a fitting tool to match detected signals, contradicting the objective law that all solid matter converts into photon plasma and gravitational force vanishes completely after celestial mergers. When calculations from the field equations conflict with galactic observational data, scholars invent unobservable hypothetical concepts such as dark matter, dark energy and extra dimensions to patch theoretical gaps, deliberately ignoring empirically verifiable physical mechanisms including interstellar plasma refraction and instantaneous action-at-a-distance gravitational force between celestial bodies. Second, the probabilistic idealistic interpretation of quantum mechanics, covering quantum superposition, Schrödinger’s cat, wave function collapse, observer effect, probability clouds, Heisenberg uncertainty principle, and subjectively biased explanations of quantum entanglement. This system breaks the law of contradiction in formal logic by asserting that objects can simultaneously hold mutually exclusive states, and arbitrarily proposes wave-particle duality to misclassify photons as entities possessing both wave and particle properties. Researchers deliberately avoid measuring fundamental parameters of photons such as vibration amplitude, vibration angle and vibration frequency. Intuitive experimental contrasts show interference and diffraction fringes only emerge when single/double slits are present, yet existing experimental equipment is fully capable of clarifying interactive mechanisms between photons and slit walls. Relevant foundational measurements have long been neglected. Third, the standard model’s artificially fitted spectrum of confined hypothetical particles, including quarks, gluons, the Higgs boson, neutrinos, virtual photons, quark-gluon plasma, etc. Heavy-ion collision experiments conducted at laboratories such as CERN can generate extreme temperatures of 2 trillion to 4 trillion degrees Celsius. Under such conditions, all solid particles fully dissociate into pure gamma photon clusters. However, to preserve the integrity of the standard model, scholars falsely claim stable quarks and gluons persist at ultrahigh temperatures, naming dense photon fireballs "quark-gluon plasma". They also introduce undetectable virtual photons to explain bidirectional conversion between photons and solid particles, fabricating imaginary intermediaries to obscure the straightforward objective law of energy-matter transformation, entirely abandoning the scientific spirit of pursuing objective truth. This paper clearly states its core stand: photons are pure energy particles with no inherent wave characteristics. The so-called "gravitational waves" defined by General Relativity do not exist objectively. The oscillating signals captured by detectors merely reflect variations in gravitational magnitude caused by relative motion of celestial bodies, rather than ripples propagating through spacetime. Gravitational force never travels in wave form. These three theoretical frameworks are tightly intertwined, forming a self-enclosed paradigm culture that prioritizes defending existing theories over exploring objective reality. They consume massive scientific research resources and continuously hinder humanity’s ability to interpret the fundamental laws of the universe through observable, logically consistent realistic concepts (the essence of photons, plasma refraction, instantaneous action-at-a-distance forces). This paper comprehensively lists all concepts inconsistent with empirical science, analyzes their flaws in logic, computation and experimental observation, and advocates reconstructing a unified physical framework grounded in observable material motion.
This volume presents three companion papers forming a unified theoretical and experimental programme for a wave-mechanical account of gravitational motion. Paper 29 develops the theoretical framework in which gravitational motion emerges from constructive-interference maximum migration of de Broglie matter waves in a density-dependent refractive-index field. The gravitational field is expressed as an effective refractive-index field n(r) derived from the Schwarzschild metric. Feynman’s path-integral formalism establishes that all non-stationary paths are eliminated by oscillatory phase cancellation, and that the surviving constructive-interference maximum shifts toward regions of higher mass density. The argument proceeds through four interconnected stages — the gravitational refractive-index field, asymmetric phase accumulation, probability-density redistribution, and physical-motion identification — completed by two theorems and one derived result. The framework recovers GR geodesics in the geometric-optics limit, requires no hidden variables, and generates five classes of experimentally discriminating predictions. Paper 77 identifies slit-material mass density as an untested variable in matter-wave interferometry. The standard single-slit formula Δy ≈ λL/a contains no density term; as a result, density has never been systematically varied as an independent parameter in a century of matter-wave experiments. This paper explains the historical absence through the structural logic of theory-determined observation and the Copenhagen prohibition on mechanism questions, establishes that electrons and fullerene C₆₀ constitute a sufficient two-point experimental programme spanning six orders of magnitude in mass, specifies a three-layer control protocol to exclude slit-width artefacts, and analyses what each possible outcome establishes for the completeness of the standard formalism. Paper 78 develops a three-dimensional experimental matrix introducing slit thickness as a third independently variable parameter alongside particle species and slit-material density. The 5×5×3 design of 75 independent measurements has a random-coincidence probability of approximately 1/1,728,000. The paper derives the quantitative scaling prediction for the thickness dimension (Δx ∝ d, ratio 1:3:6 across three thickness levels), specifies a three-layer thickness control protocol, and analyses the inferential structure of partial as well as full confirmation. The experiment begins with a single laboratory session: electron diffraction through five FIB-fabricated slits of ranked density at 50 nm thickness.
This work presents a unified, realistic, and mechanically grounded interpretation of fundamental physics across all scales, from quarks and elementary particles to atoms, macroscopic bodies, planetary motion, and black holes. The proposed framework provides a single coherent physical description capable of reproducing and explaining, within a common dynamical structure, the full range of phenomena traditionally treated separately by general relativity, quantum mechanics, and quantum electrodynamics. Within this approach, long-standing conceptual problems such as wave–particle duality, quantum interference, entanglement, and wavefunction collapse are not postulated as fundamental features of nature, but emerge naturally as dynamical properties of a physically real medium. The apparent dual behavior of matter and radiation, as well as nonlocal quantum correlations, arise from coherent and topologically constrained excitations of this medium, without invoking probabilistic ontologies or nonphysical abstractions. The theory is based on a revised physical concept of space, treated as a real superfluid medium endowed with density, elasticity, viscosity, permittivity, permeability, and a very small but non-zero electrical conductivity. In this model, space is no longer a passive geometric background, but an active physical system capable of storing, transmitting, and dissipating energy.Mass is interpreted as an isotropic compression of the superfluid, electric charge as an oriented torsional configuration, and fields as elastic stress and vorticity distributions of the medium itself. Electromagnetic and gravitational waves are described as propagating perturbations of the superfluid, while particles correspond to stable solitonic configurations sustained by the medium dynamics.At the microscopic level, starting from classical fluid equations (continuity and Euler equations) and applying the Madelung transformation, the Schrödinger equation is shown to emerge as a compact complex representation of the underlying real fluid dynamics, rather than as a fundamental postulate. Quantum phenomena such as quantization, tunneling, spin, and exclusion principles follow from stability, coherence, and topological constraints of solitonic wave structures. On cosmological scales, the same framework provides a unified interpretation of redshift, large-scale expansion phenomena, and the cosmic microwave background as cumulative dynamical and dissipative effects of wave propagation within the superfluid medium, rather than as consequences of metric expansion alone. Effects commonly attributed to dark matter and dark energy are reinterpreted as emergent manifestations of spatial density gradients, elastic stresses, and dissipative properties of the superfluid, without introducing additional unknown components. A wide range of experimentally verified phenomena—including the photoelectric effect, Compton scattering, Zeeman–Stark effects, the Aharonov–Bohm effect, Casimir effect, Unruh radiation, and cosmological attenuation effects—are consistently described within this unified framework. The proposed model offers an alternative foundational paradigm for physics, in which space, matter, and interactions emerge from a single physically intelligible dynamical system, restoring a continuous and causal description of nature from microscopic to cosmological scales.
Modern physics describes the universe through two incompatible frameworks: general relativity for the macroscopic world and quantum mechanics for the microscopic. The Absolute Medium (AM) model offers a unifying perspective: all matter is comprised of stable, persistent vortices in a continuous, fluid-like medium. This medium is not a passive background but an active participant in all physical processes. By treating particles as vortex structures, we can explain quantum behavior as fluid dynamics at the nanoscale, nuclear interactions as vortex nesting, and the emergence of life as the natural progression of complexity within the medium. We present a comprehensive model in which the fundamental substrate of reality is an all-pervading Absolute Medium (AM). The proton is the primary, self-sustaining vortex (“storm”) in this medium; all other particles are either composite states (the neutron as a proton with a nested electron) or transient fragments (quarks, gluons) produced when protons are violently disrupted. This framework provides intuitive, mechanical explanations for quantum phenomena such as wave-particle duality, the double-slit experiment, the uncertainty principle, and Pauli exclusion. It also accounts for nuclear transformations (electron capture, beta decay), the mass surplus of the neutron, and the formation of jets in high-energy collisions. Extending to complex systems, the model naturally leads to the emergence of life and consciousness as hierarchical vortex structures that process information. The AM model resolves longstanding paradoxes by treating the medium as a real physical entity whose dynamics become dominant at small scales.