The article reveals the paradox of the modern scientific approach, which denies the subjectivity of the Universe despite the achievements of quantum physics and the philosophy of consciousness. The author analyzes the reasons why science continues to ignore the hypothesis of a Living Universe, as formulated in the works of John Wheeler, and proposes viewing reality as a co-creative process between the observer and the observed. The article emphasizes the need to integrate scientific, philosophical, and spiritual knowledge in order to form a new, holistic worldview. By recognizing the Universe as a subject, humanity gains the opportunity for an ethical, cosmic, and personal breakthrough. This knowledge has the potential to give rise to a new medicine, ecology, science, and a dialogue between planetary levels of consciousness. __________________________ В статье раскрывается парадокс современного научного подхода, отрицающего субъектность Вселенной, несмотря на достижения квантовой физики и философии сознания. Автор анализирует причины, по которым наука продолжает игнорировать гипотезу о Живой Вселенной, сформулированную в работах Джона Уилера, и предлагает рассматривать реальность как процесс сотворчества наблюдателя и наблюдаемого. Подчеркивается необходимость интеграции научного, философского и духовного знания для формирования новой, целостной картины Мира. Признавая Вселенную субъектом, человечество получает шанс на этический, космический и личностный прорыв. Это знание способно породить новую медицину, экологию, науку и диалог между планетарными уровнями сознания. Author portal: https://sites.google.com/view/yermakov-orcid
The article reveals the paradox of the modern scientific approach, which denies the subjectivity of the Universe despite the achievements of quantum physics and the philosophy of consciousness. The author analyzes the reasons why science continues to ignore the hypothesis of a Living Universe, as formulated in the works of John Wheeler, and proposes viewing reality as a co-creative process between the observer and the observed. The article emphasizes the need to integrate scientific, philosophical, and spiritual knowledge in order to form a new, holistic worldview. By recognizing the Universe as a subject, humanity gains the opportunity for an ethical, cosmic, and personal breakthrough. This knowledge has the potential to give rise to a new medicine, ecology, science, and a dialogue between planetary levels of consciousness. __________________________ В статье раскрывается парадокс современного научного подхода, отрицающего субъектность Вселенной, несмотря на достижения квантовой физики и философии сознания. Автор анализирует причины, по которым наука продолжает игнорировать гипотезу о Живой Вселенной, сформулированную в работах Джона Уилера, и предлагает рассматривать реальность как процесс сотворчества наблюдателя и наблюдаемого. Подчеркивается необходимость интеграции научного, философского и духовного знания для формирования новой, целостной картины Мира. Признавая Вселенную субъектом, человечество получает шанс на этический, космический и личностный прорыв. Это знание способно породить новую медицину, экологию, науку и диалог между планетарными уровнями сознания. Author portal: https://sites.google.com/view/yermakov-orcid
The article proposes a philosophical and ontological interpretation of the concept of the “quantum” as a symbolic and structural image of the One Being. Drawing on quantum physics, philosophy of science, and the works of S. Lem and A. Tarkovsky, it argues that quantum reality can be understood not only as a physical model of the micro-world, but also as an epistemological mirror reflecting the structure of human consciousness. The paper demonstrates the inseparable relation between observer and observed as a fundamental principle of reality that transcends classical dualistic ontology. It concludes that the concept of truth must be reconsidered in terms of wholeness and ontological unity. ___________________________________ Статья предлагает философско-онтологическую интерпретацию понятия «квант» как символа и структурного образа Единого Бытия. На основе синтеза идей квантовой физики, философии науки и анализа художественных произведений С. Лема и А. Тарковского показано, что квантовая реальность может быть осмыслена не только как физическая модель микромира, но и как эпистемологическое зеркало, отражающее структуру человеческого сознания. Обосновывается положение о неразрывной связи наблюдателя и наблюдаемого как фундаментальном принципе реальности, выходящем за пределы классической дуалистической онтологии. Делается вывод о необходимости переосмысления понятия истины в терминах целостности и онтологического единства.
This text is a philosophical and mythopoetic essay that explores quantum physics as a limit framework of modern scientific thought and myth as a complementary symbolic mode of articulating reality. The author interprets quantum theory not as a metaphysical doctrine, but as a formal language that destabilizes classical object-based ontology and opens space for relational interpretations of existence. Within this interpretative horizon, myth is considered not as a primitive form of explanation, but as an experiential-symbolic system that organizes human participation in reality. The Moon appears as a central symbolic figure that historically integrates cosmological orientation, temporal cycles, and archetypal structures of consciousness. The work does not aim to propose a physical theory or an alternative interpretation of quantum mechanics in the scientific sense. Instead, it develops a philosophical reflection on the relationship between scientific formalism, symbolic thinking, and existential orientation of the human subject. ____________________________________ Данный текст представляет собой философско-мифопоэтическое эссе, в котором квантовая физика рассматривается как предельный язык современной науки, а миф — как дополнительный символический способ организации опыта реальности. Квантовая теория интерпретируется не как метафизическая доктрина, а как формальный язык, разрушающий классическую объектную онтологию и открывающий пространство реляционных интерпретаций бытия. В этом горизонте миф понимается не как примитивная форма объяснения мира, а как целостная символически-опытная система, структурирующая участие человека в реальности. Луна выступает как центральная символическая фигура, объединяющая космологическую ориентацию, цикличность времени и архетипические структуры сознания. Работа не предлагает физическую теорию или альтернативную интерпретацию квантовой механики в научном смысле. Ее цель — философская рефлексия о соотношении научного формализма, символического мышления и экзистенциальной ориентации человека. Author portal: https://sites.google.com/view/yermakov-orcid
This project brings together a series of nine interconnected works aimed at building a unified conceptual model of reality based on the wave nature of matter, energy, and consciousness. The approach treats process, rather than object, as primary; energy is viewed as the fundamental basis, and resonance as the universal mechanism of interaction. Matter is interpreted as stable wave configurations, space as an active energy-saturated medium, and consciousness as a resonant structure linked to a physical carrier but not reducible to it. The series includes a philosophical manifesto, an ontological introduction, a mathematical model of the wave structure of matter and the fractal structure of the Universe, a hypothesis of wave equilibrium, a model of the birth of measurements and the observer, works on consciousness and brain rhythms, an interpretation of gravity and the Casimir effect, and a resonant concept of cosmological evolution. The approach does not claim to replace existing physical theories but offers an additional interpretation and unification on a common conceptual basis. The work is interdisciplinary and open to critical discussion and further development. Данный проект объединяет цикл из девяти взаимосвязанных работ, посвящённых построению единой концептуальной модели реальности, в основе которой лежит представление о волновой природе материи, энергии и сознания. В рамках подхода первичным считается процесс изменения, а не объект; энергия рассматривается как фундаментальная основа, а резонанс — как универсальный механизм взаимодействия. Материя интерпретируется как устойчивые волновые конфигурации, пространство — как активная энергонасыщенная среда, а сознание — как резонансная структура, связанная с физическим носителем, но не сводимая к нему. Цикл включает философско-этический манифест, онтологическое введение, математическую модель волнового строения материи и фрактальной структуры Вселенной, гипотезу волнового равновесия, модель рождения измерений и наблюдателя, работы по сознанию и мозговым ритмам, интерпретацию гравитации и эффекта Казимира, а также резонансную концепцию космологической эволюции. Работы объединены общими принципами: квадратичные нелинейности как механизм рождения новых уровней организации, фрактальность, резонанс, конечная скорость распространения взаимодействий. Предлагаемый подход не претендует на замену существующих физических теорий, а представляет собой попытку их дополнительной интерпретации и объединения на общем концептуальном основании. Работа носит междисциплинарный характер и открыта для критического обсуждения, дальнейшего развития и проверки следствий. Полные тексты доступны в данном проекте и на Zenodo. Бұл жоба материя, энергия және сананың толқындық табиғаты туралы түсінікке негізделген бірыңғай концептуалдық шындық моделін құруға арналған тоғыз өзара байланысқан жұмыстар циклін біріктіреді. Тәсіл аясында өзгеру процесі нысаннан басым деп есептеледі; энергия іргелі негіз ретінде, ал резонанс – өзара әрекеттесудің әмбебап механизмі ретінде қарастырылады. Материя тұрақты толқындық конфигурациялар ретінде, кеңістік – белсенді энергияға қаныққан орта ретінде, ал сана – физикалық тасымалдаушымен байланысқан, бірақ оған келтірілмейтін резонанстық құрылым ретінде түсіндіріледі. Цикл философиялық-этикалық манифесті, онтологиялық кіріспені, материяның толқындық құрылымы мен Әлемнің фракталдық құрылымының математикалық моделін, толқындық тепе-теңдік гипотезасын, өлшемдер мен бақылаушының туу моделін, сана және ми ритмдері бойынша жұмыстарды, гравитация мен Казимир эффектісінің интерпретациясын, сондай-ақ космологиялық эволюцияның резонанстық концепциясын қамтиды. Жұмыстар ортақ принциптермен біріктірілген: квадраттық сызықтық емес қатынастар – ұйымдастырудың жаңа деңгейлерінің туу механизмі ретінде, фракталдылық, резонанс, өзара әрекеттесудің таралуының шекті жылдамдығы. Ұсынылып отырған тәсіл қолданыстағы физикалық теорияларды алмастыруға әрекеттенбейді, оларды жалпы концептуалдық негізде қосымша интерпретациялау және біріктіру әрекеті болып табылады. Жұмыс пәнаралық сипатта және сыни талқылауға, одан әрі дамытуға және салдарларды тексеруге ашық. Толық мәтіндер осы жобада және Zenodo сайтында қолжетімді. Полные тексты доступны на русском, казахском и английском языках в папках Russian, Kazakh и English
uestions concerning reality have plagued human consciousness since the dawn of our existence.Philosophical and scientific researchers toy with questions such as 'what is real?' in a variety of ontological and epistemological manners, using a broad array of methods.Such questions, of course, only give rise to subsequent questions pertaining to the reality of consciousness itself.Is consciousness a product of the human body (ie, the brain), or is it perhaps a deeper, even spiritual, matter?
The findings of physics at the beginning of the last century have caused a revolutionary change in our commonly accepted view of the world. Because of their seemingly paradoxical features the philosophical consequences of the new insights, however, were never really adopted by the scientific community despite the quite apparent and far-reaching technical innovations they enabled. The new so-called „quantum“ physics revealed that the world at its foundation is no longer the familiar, tangible (thing-like) reality but rather a holistic immaterial „gestalt“: pure „interconnectedness“, inseparable „potentiality“. Its evolution in time does not follow from strictly determined laws but is only guided by certain inherent tendencies exhibited in terms of definite probabilities for possible material-energetic realizations. Generally these realizations recover the appearance of the familiar classical world as an objective reality with rigorous dynamic laws. In contrast to the old world view, where matter, consisting of discrete, constant building blocks, ranks first, and its various forms result secondarily from different law-determined arrangements of these building blocks, the situation in the modern view is turned around: Relationship or „gestalt“ or „information“ is now more fundamental and substance or matter/energy appears subsequently as an as-if phenomenon on the macroscopic level. The new world view sets limits to knowledge and the related science on principle. It proves to be very powerful because it establishes bridges between all disciplines and hitherto conflicting paradigms and descriptions. In particular in this more open framework the non-living and living phenomena (including the human species) no longer appear as basically different, but as two different structures of the same immaterial essence, relating respectively to static stable and static instable (highly sensitive), but dynamically stabilised (homeostatic) configurations. In such a „basically alive“ world biology and medicine, therefore, have to accept that logistically the immaterial, information-type (“spiritual“) software in the background becomes more important than the (physical) hardware being guided by it. The well-known difficulty of complementary medicine – and in particular of homeopathy with its impressive healing record – to explain its experience in the language of the old science, based on substances and a mechanistic dynamic, may thus be resolved within the more open and flexible framework of modern „science“, in which knowledge has a more open meaning (due to basic indeterminism) offering many more dimensions for healing to the devoted healer. The observation of a highly diversified filigree crystalline structure of (liquid) water, as demonstrated by recent studies, may represent a material/energetic print-out of the hidden information coded in the basic immaterial software.
However, the observations encompassed by classical physics excludes the observer from the physical reality, yet the deep-down understandung of nature --{\it the quantum theory}-- can not avoid the intrusion of observer into the measurement process. Indeed, the quantum physics experiments have knocked the door of a new paradigm: in which science of consciousness is an important axiom. In the present work, it is argued --by taking into account of the views of learned scientists and philosophers-- that modern science is incomplete and lacking something in the basic understanding of nature \cite{r}. Classical physics has failed to explain the dynamics of the microscopic particles, eventhough modern scientific researches are based upon the prejudice posed by classical physics: keeping the outer physical universe as a separate entity, that is something quite independent of the observer --human mind. One should not forget that human-being is a part of nature and human mind is an essential component of our observations. Basically, it is the observer --the consciousness-- which makes perception possible. The working of human mind must be included in our scientific theories. In fact, human free will is an illusion and nothing in the entire universe (with life) lies outside the domain of science and determinism.