A Loophole in an Argument for Interpreting Classical Physics Indeterministically

Wyman Kwok

Published Apr 25, 2020• 0 citations

Abstract

An indeterministic interpretation of classical physics has been proposed recently, in which the argument relies on the claim that real numbers cannot represent physical reality. This paper aims at showing that the defenses for this claim are fallacious, and hence the argument has a loophole.

Related papers

Should Classical Physics Be Interpreted Indeterministically?

Wyman Kwok

An indeterministic interpretation of classical physics has been proposed recently, in which the argument relies on attacking an alleged unwarranted metaphysical hidden assumption of the standard deterministic interpretation. This short paper aims at showing that it is arguably a strawman attack.

arXiv:2005.07079Apr 25, 20200 citations

Physics without determinism: Alternative interpretations of classical physics

Flavio Del Santo, Nicolas Gisin

Classical physics is generally regarded as deterministic, as opposed to quantum mechanics that is considered the first theory to have introduced genuine indeterminism into physics. We challenge this view by arguing that the alleged determinism of classical physics relies on the tacit, metaphysical assumption that there exists an actual value of every physical quantity, with its infinite predetermined digits (which we name principle of infinite precision). Building on recent information-theoretic arguments showing that the principle of infinite precision (which translates into the attribution of a physical meaning to mathematical real numbers) leads to unphysical consequences, we consider possible alternative indeterministic interpretations of classical physics. We also link those to well-known interpretations of quantum mechanics. In particular, we propose a model of classical indeterminism based on finite information quantities (FIQs). Moreover, we discuss the perspectives that an indeterministic physics could open (such as strong emergence), as well as some potential problematic issues. Finally, we make evident that any indeterministic interpretation of physics would have to deal with the problem of explaining how the indeterminate values become determinate, a problem known in the context of quantum mechanics as (part of) the ``quantum measurement problem.'' We discuss some similarities between the classical and the quantum measurement problems, and propose ideas for possible solutions (e.g., ``collapse models'' and ``top-down causation'').

arXiv:1909.03697Physical Review ADec 5, 2019102 citations

Elegance, Facts, and Scientific Truths

Nicolas Gisin

I argue that scientific determinism is not supported by facts, but results from the elegance of the mathematical language physicists use, in particular from the so-called real numbers and their infinite series of digits. Classical physics can thus be interpreted in a deterministic or indeterministic way. However, using quantum physics, some experiments prove that nature is able to continually produce new information, hence support indeterminism in physics.

arXiv:2410.01279Oct 2, 20240 citations

Real Numbers are the Hidden Variables of Classical Mechanics

Nicolas Gisin

Do scientific theories limit human knowledge? In other words, are there physical variables hidden by essence forever? We argue for negative answers and illustrate our point on chaotic classical dynamical systems. We emphasize parallels with quantum theory and conclude that the common real numbers are, de facto, the hidden variables of classical physics. Consequently, real numbers should not be considered as ``physically real" and classical mechanics, like quantum physics, is indeterministic.

Jan 1, 201912 citations

Real numbers are the hidden variables of classical mechanics

Nicolas Gisin

Abstract Do scientific theories limit human knowledge? In other words, are there physical variables hidden by essence forever? We argue for negative answers and illustrate our point on chaotic classical dynamical systems. We emphasize parallels with quantum theory and conclude that the common real numbers are, de facto, the hidden variables of classical physics. Consequently, real numbers should not be considered as “physically real” and classical mechanics, like quantum physics, is indeterministic.

arXiv:1909.04514Quantum Studies Mathematics and FoundationsOct 31, 201920 citations

Re-Creation: A possible interpretation of quantum indeterminism

M. B. Altaie

I discuss some of the main interpretations given to explain the indeterministic nature of quantum measurements and show that all has some loopholes in one corner or another. I propose an alternative interpretation based on the notion of continued re-creation of the physical properties. The rate at which the system is re-created is a measure of the determinism of the measurements. The existence of uncertainties is better explained through this view, the meaning of incompatible observables becomes clearer and with the notion of re-creation and the origin of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle becomes more vivid.

arXiv:0907.3419Jul 20, 20092 citations