Measurements play an integral part in any scientific theory. Indeed, the observations revealing causal behaviour and symmetries in our world of experience lie at the heart of determining the truth or the falsity of scientific hypotheses. In this regard, quantum theory provides one of the most stringently tested and comprehensive description of the natural world. This thesis is an examination of the mathematical structures of quantum measurements with an emphasis on the measurement implementations of different operational devices: quantum observables, channels and instruments. The measurability of all the quantum properties a system bears is, in principle, guaranteed by quantum measurement theory. However, as physical processes, measurements are constrained by the laws of physics and it has been long known that certain conservation laws can inhibit the measurements of some of the quantum observables. In this work it is shown that such constraints stem from the fact that the measured observables inherit the symmetries of the measurement devices implementing them. A quantum measurement set-up can implement a multitude of operational devices as a function of the initial state of the apparatus. In other words, one can realize various maps – even incompatible ones – simply by controlling the apparatus’ state. Due its close resemblance with the classical analogue, this operation is often referred as quantum programming. In this thesis the capabilities and restrictions of quantum programming are explored using a measurement-theoretic approach. Moreover, quantitative methods are developed to address the mutual relations between the programming states of an arbitrary pair of observables or channels.
Measurements play an integral part in any scientific theory. Indeed, the observations revealing causal behaviour and symmetries in our world of experience lie at the heart of determining the truth or the falsity of scientific hypotheses. In this regard, quantum theory provides one of the most stringently tested and comprehensive description of the natural world. This thesis is an examination of the mathematical structures of quantum measurements with an emphasis on the measurement implementations of different operational devices: quantum observables, channels and instruments. The measurability of all the quantum properties a system bears is, in principle, guaranteed by quantum measurement theory. However, as physical processes, measurements are constrained by the laws of physics and it has been long known that certain conservation laws can inhibit the measurements of some of the quantum observables. In this work it is shown that such constraints stem from the fact that the measured observables inherit the symmetries of the measurement devices implementing them. A quantum measurement set-up can implement a multitude of operational devices as a function of the initial state of the apparatus. In other words, one can realize various maps – even incompatible ones – simply by controlling the apparatus’ state. Due its close resemblance with the classical analogue, this operation is often referred as quantum programming. In this thesis the capabilities and restrictions of quantum programming are explored using a measurement-theoretic approach. Moreover, quantitative methods are developed to address the mutual relations between the programming states of an arbitrary pair of observables or channels.
In this thesis, we consider the properties of measurements in quantum theory and other operational theories. After having introduced the framework of operational theories, we consider a communication scheme based on an experimental prepare-and-measure scenario and demonstrate this with different communication tasks. This gives us context for how the different communication tasks can be implemented in different theories, in doing so establishing quantum theory intuitively as an operational theory among other theories. The main property of measurements we focus on in this work is the simulation of measurements, which consists of manipulating the inputs and outputs of the measurement devices. We study how using this process on existing measurement devices can be used to operationally imitate new devices, and what kind of structure the simulation process induces on measurements. We also consider applications of simulability. Firstly, we consider operational restrictions imposed upon measurements. We argue that the restricted set of physical measurements must be closed with respect to the simulation process since the simulation of physical devices must lead to other physically feasible devices. We demonstrate different types of restrictions by classifying them. As a second application we see how the simulation of measurements relates to compatibility of measurements and how it can be viewed as a generalisation of it. This allows us to present an operational principle previously known to quantum theory, the no-free-information principle, according to which any measurement that is compatible with all other measurement must not provide any useful, and therefore free, information about the system. Whilst this principle holds in quantum theory, there are non-classical theories for which it is violated, and so enforcing this principle may be considered a way to exclude some unphysical theories.
Until now we have treated measurement apparatuses as devices taking quantum systems as their inputs and producing measurement outcomes as outputs. At this level of description, measurement apparatuses are fully described by observables, as discussed in Chapter 3. The measurement outcome distribution is determined by the particular input state and the observable describing the measurement device. In this chapter we explore a mathematical framework suitable for the description of measurement apparatuses for which, in addition to the measurement outcomes, the measured systems are available after the measurement is performed. In such cases we may try to obtain more information on the system by measuring some other observable, or, perhaps by filtering out some preferred output states we may use our measurement apparatus as a preparator. Clearly, in this kind of situation we need a description of measurement apparatuses that is more detailed than that of observables. Therefore, two more refined concepts, measurement models and instruments , will be investigated in this chapter. There is no customary name for a measurement model. As used here, it was first formalized in a general way by Ozawa [106], [107] who referred to the measurement process . A comprehensive general reference on quantum measurements is the monograph by Busch et al. [35], where measurement models are called premeasurements . Some other authors use the term indirect measurements . Three levels of description of measurements It is convenient to think of three levels of description when considering measurements.
Incompatibility of quantum devices is one of the cornerstones of quantum theory, and the incompatibility of quantum measurements and channels has been linked to quantum advantage in certain information-theoretic tasks. In this work, we focus on the less well explored question of the incompatibility of quantum instruments, that is, devices that describe the measurement process in its entirety, accounting for both the classical measurement outcome and the quantum postmeasurement state. In particular, we focus on the recently introduced notion of parallel compatibility of instruments, which has been argued to be a natural notion of instrument compatibility. We introduce, in a manner similar to the case of measurements and channels, the incompatibility robustness of quantum instruments and derive universal bounds on it. We then prove that postprocessing of quantum instruments is a free operation for parallel compatibility. Last, we provide families of instruments for which our bounds are tight and families of compatible indecomposable instruments.
Optimization of quantum measurement processes has a pivotal role in carrying out better, more accurate or less disrupting, measurements and experiments on a quantum system. Especially, convex optimization, i.e., identifying the extreme points of the convex sets and subsets of quantum measuring devices plays an important part in quantum optimization since the typical figures of merit for measuring processes are affine functionals. In this thesis, we discuss results determining the extreme quantum devices and their relevance, e.g., in quantum-compatibility-related questions. Especially, we see that a compatible device pair where one device is extreme can be joined into a single apparatus essentially in a unique way. Moreover, we show that the question whether a pair of quantum observables can be measured jointly can often be formulated in a weaker form when some of the observables involved are extreme. Another major line of research treated in this thesis deals with convex analysis of special restricted quantum device sets, covariance structures or, in particular, generalized imprimitivity systems. Some results on the structure ofcovariant observables and instruments are listed as well as results identifying the extreme points of covariance structures in quantum theory. As a special case study, not published anywhere before, we study the structure of Euclidean-covariant localization observables for spin-0-particles. We also discuss the general form of Weyl-covariant phase-space instruments. Finally, certain optimality measures originating from convex geometry are introduced for quantum devices, namely, boundariness measuring how ‘close’ to the algebraic boundary of the device set a quantum apparatus is and the robustness of incompatibility quantifying the level of incompatibility for a quantum device pair by measuring the highest amount of noise the pair tolerates without becoming compatible. Boundariness is further associated to minimum-error discrimination of quantum devices, and robustness of incompatibility is shown to behave monotonically under certain compatibility-non-decreasing operations. Moreover, the value of robustness of incompatibility is given for a few special device pairs.
Quantum instruments represent the most general type of quantum measurement, as they incorporate processes with both classical and quantum outputs. In many scenarios, it may be desirable to have some “on-demand” device that is capable of implementing one of many possible instruments whenever the experimenter desires. We refer to such objects as programmable instrument devices (PIDs), and this paper studies PIDs from a resource-theoretic perspective. A physically important class of PIDs are those that do not require quantum memories to implement, and these are naturally “free” in this resource theory. Additionally, these free objects correspond precisely to the class of unsteerable channel assemblages in the study of channel steering. The traditional notion of measurement incompatibility emerges as a resource in this theory since any PID controlling an incompatible family of instruments requires a quantum memory to build. We identify an incompatibility preorder between PIDs based on whether one can be transformed into another using processes that do not require additional quantum memories. Necessary and sufficient conditions are derived for when such transformations are possible based on how well certain guessing games can be played using a given PID. Ultimately our results provide an operational characterization of incompatibility, and they offer semi-device-independent tests for incompatibility in the most general types of quantum instruments. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Among the few lessons that Physics teaches us on a daily basis, one in particular is hard to miss: thermalization processes are ubiquitous. With the same degree of certainty, one can predict an apple to fall onto the ground if its stalk is cut, or a cup of tea to be found cold if left on the table for too long. In this respect, generic classical and quantum mechanical systems seem to behave in the same way. This is also one of the main difficulties in the experimental observation of the bizarre effects predicted from the quantum theory, as several of these are known to disappear at finite temperatures. It has been known for a long time that thermalization is associated with “chaotic” behavior at the microscopic level, but recently systematic efforts, both theoretical and experimental, have allowed us to understand its mechanisms at an unprecedented level of accuracy. Indeed, it has been realized that thermalization generally occurs also in isolated systems, where the absence of interactions with the environment allows for first principle theoretical investigations1. In this case thermalization takes place locally, as the whole system acts as a thermal bath for its own subsystems. Theoretical research has been motivated and paralleled by exciting experimental progress in cold-atom physics, which has provided robust, nearly ideal realizations of several theoretical models2. As an established piece of knowledge, recent research has now confirmed that two outstanding exceptions actually exist in the quantum realm, where thermalization is prevented to occur. These are many-body localized systems3, where disorder plays a crucial role, and integrable ones, which are protected by the existence of higher conservation laws. By their own nature, these systems display exceptional non-equilibrium features, which are not washed out by the onset of thermalization as relaxation occurs. At the core of the present thesis lie the remarkable properties of integrable systems out of equilibrium, with a special attention to physical effects which could be observed in cold-atom realizations. The work collected here is part of a large theoretical effort4 which in the past decade has focused on the study of relatively simple protocols to bring a quantum system out of equilibrium, such as the so-called quantum quench. In these “theoretical laboratories” it has been possible to provide quantitative predictions which helped us to develop an intuition on general questions regarding non-equilibrium and thermalization processes. Furthermore, in some cases these studies have highlighted interesting physical effects which could be directly probed experimentally within cold-atom settings. The contribution of the present thesis is two-fold. On the one hand, we have developed new technical tools for the study of integrable systems out of equilibrium, and for the computation of measurable physical quantities such as correlation functions. The techniques employed are mainly analytical and rooted within the mathematical structures of integrability. On the other hand, we have singled out physically relevant nonequilibrium situations where exotic, non-thermal states of matter emerge after relaxation occurs, and provided quantitative analytical predictions in these cases. A comprehensive discussion of the motivations and results of our work will be presented in Chapter 1, where we provide a complete overview of this thesis and discuss the organization of its content.