This paper investigates the physical, experimentable, reality of multiple worlds of Quantum Mechanics. On the basis of a reflection on the fundamental principles of physics (sec. I.A), firmly rejecting the incomprehension imperative often associated with Quantum Mechanics (sec. I.B), and strongly relying on an experimental methodology (sec. I.B) and on the superposition principle, we propose a unified interpretation of quantum physics (sec. II), the potential world modal interpretation. This framework makes multiple-world and pilot-wave interpretations converge. It also clarifies the concepts of potential world and sub-quantical potential particle. Then, we turn to Relativity and sketch out an emergence of Special Relativity without "rods and clocks" (sec. III.A) providing a cinematic and phenomenal interpretation of SR. We suggest to distinguish between given and received gravitation and reason on it at a sub-quantical level (sec. III.B) and formulate the hypothesis that weight is active between potential worlds (sec. III.C). If this effect follows the von Neumann chain, it should be observable with available techniques (sec. III.D). If correct, this hypothesis could contribute explanations for cosmic inflation, dark matter and the cosmological constant problem (sec. IV). Moreover, our cinematic interpretation of relativity in an expanding universe might lead to a justification of the MOND theory (sec. IV.B.3).
This paper investigates the physical, experimentable, reality of multiple worlds of Quantum Mechanics. On the basis of a reflection on the fundamental principles of physics (sec. I.A), firmly rejecting the incomprehension imperative often associated with Quantum Mechanics (sec. I.B), and strongly relying on an experimental methodology (sec. I.B) and on the superposition principle, we propose a unified interpretation of quantum physics (sec. II), the potential world modal interpretation. This framework makes multiple-world and pilot-wave interpretations converge. It also clarifies the concepts of potential world and sub-quantical potential particle. Then, we turn to Relativity and sketch out an emergence of Special Relativity without "rods and clocks" (sec. III.A) providing a cinematic and phenomenal interpretation of SR. We suggest to distinguish between given and received gravitation and reason on it at a sub-quantical level (sec. III.B) and formulate the hypothesis that weight is active between potential worlds (sec. III.C). If this effect follows the von Neumann chain, it should be observable with available techniques (sec. III.D). If correct, this hypothesis could contribute explanations for cosmic inflation, dark matter and the cosmological constant problem (sec. IV). Moreover, our cinematic interpretation of relativity in an expanding universe might lead to a justification of the MOND theory (sec. IV.B.3).
This article suggests a new quantum mechanical framework to investigate the relations between space-time and particles. First, we introduce a formal framework to deal with possible worlds, we say potential worlds, independent of interpretations: the quantical modal logic. This framework is compatible but simpler than multiple-world and pilot-wave interpretations and avoids ontological commitments. On this basis, we reformulate virtual particles of QFT as potential particles and, adding a few reasonable hypotheses, we show that Lorentz transformation and Special Relativity (SR) emerge as a Quantum Mechanical phenomenon, unlike Ein-stein's interpretation. This kinetic theory of SR relies mainly on a reformulation of SR without "rods and clocks". We use the same model to derive Newtonian gravitation solely from a gravitational redshift assumption. This theory drives us to suggest the trans-world gravitation hypothesis that the weight might be active between the potential worlds. If this effect is real, we show it to be experimentable with available techniques. Finally, in a speculative part of this article we explore some foreseeable consequences of the trans-world gravitation phenomenon. We suggest that it could contribute explanations for the cosmic inflation, the dark matter and the cosmological constant problem. Moreover, our kinetic theory in an expanding universe might lead to a justification of the MOND theory.
The measurement problem in quantum mechanics has been a cause of much puzzlement over the years. The very idea of having two different versions of reality for the same system has been a cause for much debate. Often quantum mechanics textbooks follow the ‘shut up and calculate’ paradigm. This denies the opportunity for the common student to understand the consequence of one of the most elegant and beautiful aspects of science. The state of the art textbooks give a purely algebraic, perfunctory and monotonous approach where the real consequence of the system is not fully appreciated. A good reason for this is the considerable deviation of the quantum mechanical process from the commonsensical idea of truth, reality and reason. We tend to look at the world in a materialistic, deterministic, causal and objectivistic way. We tend not to accept a world of contradictions. A quantum measurement is essentially an amalgamation of contradictions, mystery and duality. It encompasses an implicit dependence on subjectivity and contradicts with causality as we know it. We look at the world as in the present. But a quantum mechanical measurement is a prediction of the future influenced by the observer or the measurer. This offers a philosophical and pedagogical conundrum. It poses a challenge on not just how our perception of the world might change in addition to providing a big challenge on how to make it compatible with the other successful theories of physics. The most common text book interpretation of quantum mechanics has been the Copenhagen Interpretation suggests the ‘collapse of the wave function’ as a mechanism of transition between duality. But a more bizarre yet elegant theory, extending quantum formalism to the classical domain, called the Many Worlds Interpretation has been catching up very quickly; it stands for the split of the universe when we make a quantum mechanical measurement. Consequently, reality as we is redefined as a universal wave function which is a superposition of several outcomes, which is incompatible with many of the successful concepts of physics and has several problems like the correct idea about probability or basis. We adapt the idea of the universal wave function, but instead suggest a continuum interpretation of quantum mechanics where the universal wave function represents the entire singular universe and the concept of atoms or electrons as conceptually a continuous part of it rather than a distinct separate entity. Such an interpretation could be compatible with other continuum theories like the Superfluid vacuum theory or the Higgs Field.
By expanding the research paradigm and reconciling the two binary oppositions of "relative and absolute" and "quantum and classical" in physics, a new theoretical framework that is compatible with relativity and quantum mechanics is proposed. Firstly, excavate and establish three universal axioms: Axiom 1 (consensus guarantees equal rights), Axiom 2 (objective existence independent of measurement), and Axiom 3 (universality of causality and dialectical logic), based on which to criticize the logical contradictions of existing theories. In the field of relativity, this article points out that there is a logical paradox in the explanation of "clock slowing down depends on relative motion" in special relativity (A clock is both faster and slower than B clock), and proposes a relative absolute spacetime view that "absolute motion leads to clock slowing down". By extending the Lorentz transformation, absolute motion and relative motion are unified, solving problems such as the twin paradox. At the same time, based on the prediction of the Dirac equation for negative mass matter, the "negative mass spacetime curvature paradox" is proposed, challenging Einstein's physical explanation of spacetime curvature and arguing that it is only a mathematical tool (the mathematical expression of gravity) rather than a physical reality. In the field of quantum mechanics, this article criticizes the Copenhagen interpretation for violating Axiom 2 (denying the independent eigenstates of microscopic particles). By modifying the Schrödinger equation twice (For the first time, electromagnetic potential energy was replaced with gravitational potential energy, and the Schrödinger-Tu equation was established to describe macroscopic objects such as the Earth's revolution; The second step is to convert potential energy into electromagnetic/gravitational force and derive the wave mechanics equation of classical mechanics laws, such as Newton's second law with force operator), proves that quantum and classical theories are compatible within the same mathematical framework. In the experiment, it was demonstrated through the "anti-interference electron diffraction experiment" that a strong magnetic field only changes the shape of diffraction fringes without causing them to disappear, denying the inevitability of quantum decoherence. The establishment of "generalized wave dynamics" and "relative absolute spacetime view" breaks the binary opposition of traditional theories and provides a new paradigm for the unity of relativity and quantum mechanics. The core value of these jobs lies in: In terms of theoretical innovation, reconstruct the space-time and quantum interpretation system, while retaining the original mathematical form system; In terms of experimental verification, design feasible schemes such as hollow glass disk Jones experiment and geometric optical velocimetry experiment; In terms of philosophical significance, replacing "mathematical symmetry" with "content unity" and returning to the objectivity of physical mechanisms. The research conclusion indicates that by expanding paradigms and axiomatic constraints, the contradiction between relativity and quantum mechanics can be transformed into a complementary relationship, laying the foundation for the great unity of physics theory
Fundamentals of quantum mechanics Quantum mechanics remains one of the most successful, yet enigmatic, formulations of physics. Uncertainty and measurement constraints are incorporated at the core of this fundamental description of micro-physical dynamics. Quantum mechanics successfully describes the observed structures in chemistry and materials science. In particular, the impenetrability of matter due to Pauli exclusion is a consequence of incorporating special relativity into quantum mechanics. Microscopic causality , or the requirement that communications cannot propagate at greater than the speed of light, relates a particle's spin to its quantum statistics but does not exclude the space-like correlations associated with a coherent quantum state. This section will examine some of the foundations of quantum physics. An emphasis will be placed upon how the microscopic fundamentals of quantum mechanics relate to the geometric fundamentals of gravitational mechanics. Quantum formalism There are several interpretations of quantum mechanics offering models of the underlying (often hidden) dynamics that generate the observed quantum phenomenology (for example, the Copenhagen interpretation, or the many-worlds interpretation). Since any interpretation consistent with quantum physics cannot be proved or disproved by experiment, only those aspects of quantum formalism directly connected to experimental observables will be developed, with minimal interpretation imposed. To establish the conventions utilized in what follows, a brief overview of the formalism that describes those calculable observables modeled by quantum physics will be given.
The first famous thought experiment of Einstein gives rise to his theories of relativity, the bedrock of modern astrophysics and cosmology. His second famous thought experiment begins the investigation into the foundations of quantum mechanics. It leads to a paradox, inspiring various 'no-go' theorems proven by Bell, Kochen, and Specker. Physicists and philosophers worldwide become increasingly dissatisfied with the probabilistic complementarity interpretation (Born-Bohr) and eventually offer their own accounts of the theory. By the end of the 20th century two alternative approaches stand out as the best candidates: Both the hidden variables interpretation (de Broglie-Bohm) and the many worlds interpretation (Everett-DeWitt) give compelling descriptions of what the true nature of quantum reality could be. In this paper, a chronological overview of all these events is given, followed by a philosophical analysis of the three aforementioned interpretations. Ultimately it is concluded that the many worlds interpretation should be adopted as the best understanding of the formalism of quantum mechanics and, therefore, should be used in the multiversity textbooks.
This paper presents a unified gauge-theoretic framework that resolves fundamental incompatibilities between General Relativity and the Standard Model by rejecting the axiom of linear time. The KnoWellian Universe Theory (KUT) proposes that time possesses an irreducible ternary structure composed of three perpetually interacting realms: the Past (Control), the Instant (Consciousness), and the Future (Chaos). Through a U(1)⁶ gauge symmetry, KUT generates six fundamental gauge fields that mediate not only spatial gravity but also two cosmological forces identified as Dark Energy (outward Control flow) and Dark Matter (inward Chaos collapse). Central to the framework is the KnoWellian Resonant Attractor Manifold (KRAM)—a dynamic, higher-dimensional memory substrate underlying spacetime itself. This work presents a radically modified Bohmian pilot-wave mechanism wherein the Chaos field (pilot wave) physically "etches" the complete history of quantum events into KRAM's geometric structure, creating persistent "attractor valleys." This mechanism provides concrete physical explanations for fine-tuning, morphic resonance, and the emergence of linear particle tracks from spherically symmetric wavefunctions (the Mott Problem). The framework redefines mass as the "activation energy of existence" required for irreversible rendering of potentiality into actuality, providing a formal solution to the Yang-Mills Mass Gap problem. It demonstrates that mathematical questions about completed infinities, such as the Riemann Hypothesis, are "un-renderable" within a procedural universe. KUT makes multiple specific, falsifiable predictions including: (1) Cairo pentagonal tiling geometry in CMB anisotropies, (2) coherent "ghost" patterns in cosmic voids from prior cycles, (3) geometric derivation of the fine-structure constant α ≈ 1/137, (4) Cairo lattice topology in high-coherence brain states, (5) spectral break in stochastic gravitational wave background, and (6) absence of primordial B-mode polarization. By integrating physics, ontology, and consciousness into a single coherent Lagrangian, this work offers a complete, paradox-free, and empirically testable description of reality as participatory process rather than passive object. Changes in Version 2 (January 10, 2026) Nomenclature Standardization Field notation consistency: Standardized triadic field notation for clarity and physical interpretation Changed φ_C → φ_M (M for Mass/Matter, emphasizing rendered actuality in the Control field) Changed φ_X → φ_W (W for Wave, emphasizing unrendered potentiality in the Chaos field) Retained φ_I (Instant/Consciousness field, the synthesizing mediator) Symbolic consistency: Standardized bounded infinity notation from c⁺ to c+ throughout document Technical Corrections Updated DOI to reflect current Zenodo record: 10.5281/zenodo.18210128 Corrected publication date to January 10, 2026 Updated "Last Modified" metadata to January 10, 2026 Rationale for Field Notation Changes The new nomenclature (φ_M, φ_I, φ_W) provides clearer physical interpretation: φ_M (Mass): Represents the rendered, particle-like, actualized state of reality (Control field from the Past) φ_W (Wave): Represents the unrendered, wave-like, potential state of reality (Chaos field from the Future) φ_I (Instant): Represents the consciousness-mediated synthesis occurring at the eternal "now" This triadic correspondence (Mass-Instant-Wave) aligns more intuitively with wave-particle duality, making the framework more accessible while maintaining mathematical rigor. The M-I-W notation reinforces that particles (M) and waves (W) are not separate entities but different ontological states of the same underlying field structure, mediated through conscious interaction (I). Document Integrity All equations, theorems, proofs, physical interpretations, and predictions remain mathematically and conceptually identical to Version 1. These changes affect only notation and metadata, not substantive content or theoretical claims. Keywords: KnoWellian Universe Theory, ternary time, gauge theory, KRAM, pilot wave, quantum mechanics, consciousness, dark matter, dark energy, mass gap, Mott problem, procedural ontology, morphic resonance, fine-structure constant, CMB anisotropies Subject Categories: Theoretical Physics, Quantum Mechanics, Cosmology, Philosophy of Physics, Consciousness Studies