By expanding the research paradigm and reconciling the two binary oppositions of "relative and absolute" and "quantum and classical" in physics, a new theoretical framework that is compatible with relativity and quantum mechanics is proposed. Firstly, excavate and establish three universal axioms: Axiom 1 (consensus guarantees equal rights), Axiom 2 (objective existence independent of measurement), and Axiom 3 (universality of causality and dialectical logic), based on which to criticize the logical contradictions of existing theories. In the field of relativity, this article points out that there is a logical paradox in the explanation of "clock slowing down depends on relative motion" in special relativity (A clock is both faster and slower than B clock), and proposes a relative absolute spacetime view that "absolute motion leads to clock slowing down". By extending the Lorentz transformation, absolute motion and relative motion are unified, solving problems such as the twin paradox. At the same time, based on the prediction of the Dirac equation for negative mass matter, the "negative mass spacetime curvature paradox" is proposed, challenging Einstein's physical explanation of spacetime curvature and arguing that it is only a mathematical tool (the mathematical expression of gravity) rather than a physical reality. In the field of quantum mechanics, this article criticizes the Copenhagen interpretation for violating Axiom 2 (denying the independent eigenstates of microscopic particles). By modifying the Schrödinger equation twice (For the first time, electromagnetic potential energy was replaced with gravitational potential energy, and the Schrödinger-Tu equation was established to describe macroscopic objects such as the Earth's revolution; The second step is to convert potential energy into electromagnetic/gravitational force and derive the wave mechanics equation of classical mechanics laws, such as Newton's second law with force operator), proves that quantum and classical theories are compatible within the same mathematical framework. In the experiment, it was demonstrated through the "anti-interference electron diffraction experiment" that a strong magnetic field only changes the shape of diffraction fringes without causing them to disappear, denying the inevitability of quantum decoherence. The establishment of "generalized wave dynamics" and "relative absolute spacetime view" breaks the binary opposition of traditional theories and provides a new paradigm for the unity of relativity and quantum mechanics. The core value of these jobs lies in: In terms of theoretical innovation, reconstruct the space-time and quantum interpretation system, while retaining the original mathematical form system; In terms of experimental verification, design feasible schemes such as hollow glass disk Jones experiment and geometric optical velocimetry experiment; In terms of philosophical significance, replacing "mathematical symmetry" with "content unity" and returning to the objectivity of physical mechanisms. The research conclusion indicates that by expanding paradigms and axiomatic constraints, the contradiction between relativity and quantum mechanics can be transformed into a complementary relationship, laying the foundation for the great unity of physics theory
By expanding the research paradigm and reconciling the two binary oppositions of "relative and absolute" and "quantum and classical" in physics, a new theoretical framework that is compatible with relativity and quantum mechanics is proposed. Firstly, excavate and establish three universal axioms: Axiom 1 (consensus guarantees equal rights), Axiom 2 (objective existence independent of measurement), and Axiom 3 (universality of causality and dialectical logic), based on which to criticize the logical contradictions of existing theories. In the field of relativity, this article points out that there is a logical paradox in the explanation of "clock slowing down depends on relative motion" in special relativity (A clock is both faster and slower than B clock), and proposes a relative absolute spacetime view that "absolute motion leads to clock slowing down". By extending the Lorentz transformation, absolute motion and relative motion are unified, solving problems such as the twin paradox. At the same time, based on the prediction of the Dirac equation for negative mass matter, the "negative mass spacetime curvature paradox" is proposed, challenging Einstein's physical explanation of spacetime curvature and arguing that it is only a mathematical tool (the mathematical expression of gravity) rather than a physical reality. In the field of quantum mechanics, this article criticizes the Copenhagen interpretation for violating Axiom 2 (denying the independent eigenstates of microscopic particles). By modifying the Schrödinger equation twice (For the first time, electromagnetic potential energy was replaced with gravitational potential energy, and the Schrödinger-Tu equation was established to describe macroscopic objects such as the Earth's revolution; The second step is to convert potential energy into electromagnetic/gravitational force and derive the wave mechanics equation of classical mechanics laws, such as Newton's second law with force operator), proves that quantum and classical theories are compatible within the same mathematical framework. In the experiment, it was demonstrated through the "anti-interference electron diffraction experiment" that a strong magnetic field only changes the shape of diffraction fringes without causing them to disappear, denying the inevitability of quantum decoherence. The establishment of "generalized wave dynamics" and "relative absolute spacetime view" breaks the binary opposition of traditional theories and provides a new paradigm for the unity of relativity and quantum mechanics. The core value of these jobs lies in: In terms of theoretical innovation, reconstruct the space-time and quantum interpretation system, while retaining the original mathematical form system; In terms of experimental verification, design feasible schemes such as hollow glass disk Jones experiment and geometric optical velocimetry experiment; In terms of philosophical significance, replacing "mathematical symmetry" with "content unity" and returning to the objectivity of physical mechanisms. The research conclusion indicates that by expanding paradigms and axiomatic constraints, the contradiction between relativity and quantum mechanics can be transformed into a complementary relationship, laying the foundation for the great unity of physics theory
Two axioms were excavated. Axiom 1: Only by allowing communication and generating consensus can we ensure equal rights for different individuals. Axiom 2: Objective existence is an original independent existence that is independent of measurement and does not rely on third parties. Axiom 3: All real things have their objective and independent original existence states. Let A and B move relative to each other and observe each other's clocks. In the language of relativity, they all believe that the observed clock slows down. The consensus between A and B is that A clock is both slower and faster than B clock. According to Axiom 2, it can be concluded that quantum mechanics must be a 'local realism'. So, the Copenhagen quantum mechanics explanation violates Axiom 2. One of the methods for qualitatively and quantitatively coordinating relative and absolute is to assume that the clock of absolute motion slows down, thus establishing a relative absolute spatiotemporal view. According to the Dirac equation, the existence of negative mass matter can be predicted. A positive mass particle and a negative mass particle cannot fall at the same acceleration in the induced field. Einstein's explanation of spacetime curvature was fatally challenged. The potential energy of electromagnetic interactions in the Schrödinger equation can be replaced with gravitational potential energy to form the Schrödinger-Tu equation. The potential energy in the equation can be further transformed into force (electromagnetic force and/or gravitational force). the mathematical factors of quantum theory and classical theory can be written into the same equation. The classical laws of mechanics can be expressed using wave mechanics equations.
The explanation of quantum mechanics has never been satisfactory. The successful application of quantum mechanics is generally attributed to the mathematical system of quantum mechanics. The application research of quantum encryption communication and quantum computers using quantum entanglement is very difficult. The binary opposition between quantum and classical has hindered human scientific thinking. The widespread quest to quantize gravity mirrors humanity's enduring drive to unify quantum and macroscopic physical frameworks. This research initiates its inquiry by integrating quantum mechanics with classical mechanics, yielding novel analytical perspectives, and introduces the Schrödinger-Tu equation—a wave function that incorporates gravitational potential energy and is capable of describing macroscopic objects. Validating the practical viability of merging quantum and classical approaches, several computational cases involving atoms and molecules yield successful outcomes. Additionally, this study derives a wavemechanical formulation of classical mechanical laws, furnishing direct empirical evidence that quantum mechanics and classical mechanics are not mutually exclusive but rather compatible and complementary. Further substantiation of their compatibility encompasses the following key points: The mass term m in the Schrödinger equation (SE) can be scaled to sufficiently large values to characterize macroscopic entities; The steady-state SE (Tψ+Vψ=Eψ) inherently integrates the wave function ψ with the classical energy conservation relation T+V=E; Potential energy functions within the SE can be derived from macroscopic force fields; Newton's second law F=ma and the SE are mutually derivable, establishing a fundamental theoretical linkage; Electron diffraction experiments concurrently demonstrate wave-particle duality, a phenomenon that bridges both mechanical frameworks. This paradigm shift—recasting the relationship between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics from one of incompatibility to compatibility—represents a pivotal theoretical advancement, with the potential to catalyze the development of a generalized wave mechanics.
The widespread quest to quantize gravity mirrors humanity’s enduring drive to unify quantum and macroscopic physical frameworks. This research initiates its inquiry by integrating quantum mechanics with classical mechanics, yielding novel analytical perspectives, and introduces the Schrödinger-Tu equation—a wave function that incorporates gravitational potential energy and is capable of describing macroscopic objects. Validating the practical viability of merging quantum and classical approaches, several computational cases involving atoms and molecules yield successful outcomes. Additionally, this study derives a wave-mechanical formulation of classical mechanical laws, furnishing direct empirical evidence that quantum mechanics and classical mechanics are not mutually exclusive but rather compatible and complementary. Further substantiation of their compatibility encompasses the following. key points: • The mass term m in the Schrödinger equation (SE) can be scaled to sufficiently large values to characterize macroscopic entities • The steady-state SE (Tψ +Vψ=Eψ) inherently integrates the wave function ψ with the classical energy conservation relation T+V=E; • Potential energy functions within the SE can be derived from macroscopic force fields; • Newton’s second law F=ma and the SE are mutually derivable, establishing a fundamental theoretical linkage; 5.Electron diffraction experiments concurrently demonstrate wave-particle duality, a phenomenon that bridges both mechanical frameworks.This paradigm shift—recasting the relationship between quantum and classical mechanics from one of incompatibility to ompatibility—represents a pivotal theoretical advancement, with the potential to catalyze the development of a generalized wave echanics.
The mainstream system of physics today is shackled by three major theoretical frameworks that fundamentally deviate from research rooted in matter and objective reality. All three are constructed based on abstract assumptions that contradict intuitive material motion and formal logic. First, the geometric metaphysical system derived from General Relativity, including spacetime curvature, Einstein’s field equations, extra dimensions, gravitational waves, black hole singularities, the Big Bang, dark matter, dark energy, spacetime distortion, wormholes and other related flawed propositions. This framework arbitrarily reinterprets gravitational effects of celestial bodies as unobservable geometric deformations of spacetime, and fabricates the concept of "gravitational waves" claimed to propagate at the speed of light. Quantitative calculations targeting the 1.3-billion-light-year black hole merger event prove that the field equations artificially set a mere 5% mass loss ratio. The calculated amplitude of gravitational fluctuations is tens of thousands of times larger than values derived from Newtonian mechanics consistent with real material transformation rules. This parameter is only a fitting tool to match detected signals, contradicting the objective law that all solid matter converts into photon plasma and gravitational force vanishes completely after celestial mergers. When calculations from the field equations conflict with galactic observational data, scholars invent unobservable hypothetical concepts such as dark matter, dark energy and extra dimensions to patch theoretical gaps, deliberately ignoring empirically verifiable physical mechanisms including interstellar plasma refraction and instantaneous action-at-a-distance gravitational force between celestial bodies. Second, the probabilistic idealistic interpretation of quantum mechanics, covering quantum superposition, Schrödinger’s cat, wave function collapse, observer effect, probability clouds, Heisenberg uncertainty principle, and subjectively biased explanations of quantum entanglement. This system breaks the law of contradiction in formal logic by asserting that objects can simultaneously hold mutually exclusive states, and arbitrarily proposes wave-particle duality to misclassify photons as entities possessing both wave and particle properties. Researchers deliberately avoid measuring fundamental parameters of photons such as vibration amplitude, vibration angle and vibration frequency. Intuitive experimental contrasts show interference and diffraction fringes only emerge when single/double slits are present, yet existing experimental equipment is fully capable of clarifying interactive mechanisms between photons and slit walls. Relevant foundational measurements have long been neglected. Third, the standard model’s artificially fitted spectrum of confined hypothetical particles, including quarks, gluons, the Higgs boson, neutrinos, virtual photons, quark-gluon plasma, etc. Heavy-ion collision experiments conducted at laboratories such as CERN can generate extreme temperatures of 2 trillion to 4 trillion degrees Celsius. Under such conditions, all solid particles fully dissociate into pure gamma photon clusters. However, to preserve the integrity of the standard model, scholars falsely claim stable quarks and gluons persist at ultrahigh temperatures, naming dense photon fireballs "quark-gluon plasma". They also introduce undetectable virtual photons to explain bidirectional conversion between photons and solid particles, fabricating imaginary intermediaries to obscure the straightforward objective law of energy-matter transformation, entirely abandoning the scientific spirit of pursuing objective truth. This paper clearly states its core stand: photons are pure energy particles with no inherent wave characteristics. The so-called "gravitational waves" defined by General Relativity do not exist objectively. The oscillating signals captured by detectors merely reflect variations in gravitational magnitude caused by relative motion of celestial bodies, rather than ripples propagating through spacetime. Gravitational force never travels in wave form. These three theoretical frameworks are tightly intertwined, forming a self-enclosed paradigm culture that prioritizes defending existing theories over exploring objective reality. They consume massive scientific research resources and continuously hinder humanity’s ability to interpret the fundamental laws of the universe through observable, logically consistent realistic concepts (the essence of photons, plasma refraction, instantaneous action-at-a-distance forces). This paper comprehensively lists all concepts inconsistent with empirical science, analyzes their flaws in logic, computation and experimental observation, and advocates reconstructing a unified physical framework grounded in observable material motion.
Physics is also known as a science of observation and experiment. In this paper, the most representative experimental verification of general relativity, "Mercury perihelion precession", is used for mathematical derivation and analysis, and the serious errors in the experimental verification are expounded deeply. Furthermo2re, the Lorentz transformation, the core formula of special relativity, is mathematically deduced and analyzed, and the contradictions and errors existing in the Lorentz transformation are profoundly revealed. These contradictions and errors involve the deep relationship between physics and mathematics, and are also the core problems faced by theoretical physics. Minkowski's four-dimensional spacetime contradicts the "principle of constant speed of light", and there are serious errors in the "relativity of simultaneity". The so-called experimental verification of the theory of relativity is false, and there is a fundamental error in the theory of relativity, which will lead to the collapse of the whole theoretical building, including general relativity. The basic formula of quantum mechanics, "matter wave" wavelength λ=h/p , is also based on the wrong Einstein "massenergy equation". Therefore, the wave function of "matter wave" established on the wavelength λ=h/p of "de Broglie wave" and the Schrodinger equation are all pseudo-formulas without any physical significance. Schrodinger equation is the core formula of quantum mechanics. This is enough to cause the collapse of quantum mechanics.The mathematical derivation of the Compton effect was completely based on the pseudo-concepts of special relativity such as "mass-energy equation" and "moving mass", while Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect was limited by the scientific and technological level at that time. The Compton effect and the photoelectric effect, as the two most important experimental verification of the "waver-particle duality" of light, were not valid. "Wade-particle duality" is another misdirection of Einstein to human beings, which "inspired" de Broglie to put forward the famous "matter wave" hypothesis, and the "matter wave" concept is the root that led theoretical physics to fall into the abyss of quantum mechanics. In addition, there are serious errors in the basic concept of quantum mechanics. "Monochromatic radiant outdegree" is an incomplete definition of physics, which is also the root cause of the "ultraviolet disaster" problem. The defective physics concept of "monochromatic radiant outdegree" is also an important reason for theoretical physics to fall into the "quantization" quake-pit. The "ultraviolet catastrophe" problem of blackbody radiation is a physical accident caused by the artificially defined defect concept of "monochromatic radiance outdegree". Boer's hydrogen atom theory is the foundation theory of quantum mechanics. Like relativity theory, this theory also has the problem that the same mathematical symbol expresses two contradictory physical meanings at the same time. Quantum tunneling has the problem of different physical interpretation of mathematical formulas. No matter the premise or the core formula, there are serious contradictions and errors in quantum mechanics, and quantum mechanics is also a wrong theory. The theory of relativity and quantum mechanics is a lost on the journey of human truth exploration. The fundamental errors of relativity and quantum mechanics will lead to the comprehensive collapse of theoretical physics system including relativistic quantum mechanics, quantum field theory (quantum electrodynamics, quantum chromodynamics, unified theory of weak electricity, standard model of elementary particle physics), Yang Mills theory and so on. Fortunately, in the course of nearly a century of exploration, human beings have accumulated a large number of empirical results. Although the theory Journal of Electrical Electronics Engineering ISSN: 2834-4928 1 Department of Mathematical Science, College of Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 2 School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100091, China 3 School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui 230026, China J Electrical Electron Eng, 2023 Volume 2 | Issue 4 | 381 of relativity is completely wrong, it does not affect the real existence of such an objective thing as the atomic bomb. Laser, transistor, tunnel microscope and so on have nothing to do with quantum mechanics, because quantum mechanics is also a fundamentally wrong theory, but this does not hinder the validity of the existing experimental results, the so-called experimental verification of relativity and quantum mechanics are forced to incorporate experimental results and physical phenomena into their own theoretical system. Special thanks to Academician Chen Jia-er for his theoretical guidance and help
Conventional relativity places four-dimensional spacetime connected by Lorentz transformations, and fourdimensional spacetime curved by gravity, at the foundation of physical spacetime, whereas quantum mechanics places Hilbert space at the foundation of state description. As long as these two structures are simultaneously treated as fundamental realities, relativistic quantum theory and quantum gravity must begin with the problem of how a dynamically curved spacetime is to be quantized and made consistent with Hilbert-space states. Nakaza New Relativity Theory (NNRT) changes this very point of departure. NNRT takes universal time and universal three-dimensional space as physical spacetime and connects the real motions of all inertial systems by the Galilean Transformation (GT), while relocating the Lorentz transformation, time dilation, length contraction, and the gravitational metric to the observational and measurement layer obtained through electromagnetic phase. The successful mathematics and experimental values of conventional relativity are therefore retained, but the ontology in which curved and deformable four-dimensional spacetime is the unique physical spacetime is not retained. This paper uses NNRT as a new entry into quantum mechanics and repositions Hilbert space not as physical space, but as a mathematical representation space that preserves states, phases, probabilities, and correlations. Using the atomic clock as a concrete example, the paper further presents a continuous observational chain in which quantum levels generate a frequency scale and the resulting phase signal is compared between systems through relative motion and gravitational fields. Accordingly, the conventional entry point—how to quantize a physically real curved four-dimensional spacetime and incorporate it into Hilbert space—loses its premise within NNRT, and quantum theory and relativity are reconstructed as distinct representational and observational structures arising from a common universal physical spacetime. Schrödinger’s cat, EPR/Bell correlations, time dilation, length contraction, the twin problem, and the reification of the gravitational metric can then be organized as manifestations of a common ontological operation: identifying a mathematical representation with physical reality itself. The significance of this paper is therefore not to add another interpretation alongside conventional relativity, but to absorb its successful mathematics into the observational layer of NNRT and, by turning the ontological point of departure, to provide a new formulation of foundational problems that includes quantum mechanics.