Geometric Aspects of Quantum Entanglement
Leif Ove Hansen
Abstract
Summary: \nEntanglement is a strange feature contained in the quantum mechanical framework, first observed theoretically by Erwin Schrödinger and Albert Einstein. An inherent attribute of entanglement is non-locality, and in the continuation of this, several non-reductionist features, which are conceptually challenging and philosophically interesting. \n \nA considerable growth of the interest in quantum entanglement has occurred since the early 1990s, and much of the reason for this is that the tools of quantum optics and modern instrumentation have made it possible to measure and manipulate entangled quantum systems. Today, several applications of entanglement exist, including quantum computers and several areas in quantum communications. \n \nA quantum state is either separable or entangled, it cannot be none or both. A separable state do not exhibit the non-local features found in entangled states, and are in this sense comparable to classic states. An important issue here is the separability problem, which is the problem of determining whether a given state is entangled or not. \n \nWe study these quantum states as Hermitian matrices with positive eigenvalues in convex spaces. The PPT criterion is based on the partial transposition operation, which essentially transposes one of the two subsystems in the quantum system. For some states the result is another quantum (positive) state, and these are PPT (Positive Partial Transpose) states, while others that gain negative eigenvalues are called NPT states. \n \nFor systems of dimensions 2 × 2 and 2 × 3, the PPT states are identical to the separable states, and the NPT states are identical to the entangled states, so the PPT criterion is always conclusive. But for larger dimensions, such as for instance the 3 × 3 system, there always exist PPT states that are entangled, so for this case the PPT criterion can only be used in a contrapositive way. Since entangled PPT states in this sense seem to have great significance, their characteristics are worth studying. \nAs mentioned, the PPT criterion uses the transposition map on one of the two subsystems of a composite quantum system. Transposition is an example of a positive map, in that it maps all quantum states into quantum states. It is possible to use positive maps to formulate a much more general criterion for the separability problem.There is a link (an isomorphism) between positive maps and a subset of Hermitian operators called entanglement witnesses. \n \nThe so-called Horodecki criterion states that a quantum state is separable if and only if the expectation value of all entanglement witnesses in the state are non-negative. If the expectation value of one (or possibly several) entanglement witnesses in a given quantum state is negative, then the state is always entangled. This criterion is both necessary and sufficient, but demands that we can characterize the entire set of entanglement witnesses. \n \nThe approach in this thesis is through geometry. Of fundamental importance is the convex nature of the sets in question. The knowledge and understanding of the extremal points in these sets is very relevant, since they describe the sets completely. Undertaking completely analytic studies of the geometry at hand is in general very hard, especially as the dimension of the systems grow. The development and use of numerical tools is therefore essential.