Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Quantum cognition and Bell’s inequality: A model for probabilistic judgment bias

Giorgio Gronchi, Elia Strambini

Published Oct 10, 2016• 39 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.jmp.2016.09.003

Related papers

Quantum contextuality and cognitive contextuality: The significance of violations of Bell-type inequalities

Yoshihiro Maruyama

Biosystems•Jul 10, 2021•4 citations

Statistical and subjective interpretations of probability in quantum-like models of cognition and decision making

Emmanuel E. Haven, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Journal of Mathematical Psychology•Mar 9, 2016•38 citations

An overview of the quantum cognition research programme

Jiaqi Adam Huang, Gunnar Paul Epping, Jennifer S. Trueblood +3 more

The quantum cognition research programme concerns the application of quantum probability theory(the rules for how to assign probabilities to events from quantum mechanics, without the physics) tocognitive modeling. We review quantum cognitive models in several areas of psychology, includingconjunction/ disjunction fallacies in probabilistic judgment, conceptual combinations, similarity, order effects on judgments, causal inference, the disjunction effect in decision making, measurement and interference effects on judgments and decisions, memory, perception, and other judgment anddecision-making applications. For each area, we first present the empirical findings that have motivated the application of quantum models, emphasizing any characteristics which are particularly puzzling or have resisted coherent theoretical explanations previously; we then discuss the quantum cognitive models, noting the key features of the models that help explain the empirical data; we finally cast a critical eye on the models and explore comparisons with non-quantum models.

•Jan 25, 2025•2 citations

Quantum Cognitively Motivated Decision Fusion for Video Sentiment Analysis

Dimitris Gkoumas, Qiuchi Li, Shahram Dehdashti +3 more

Video sentiment analysis as a decision-making process is inherently complex, involving the fusion of decisions from multiple modalities and the so-caused cognitive biases. Inspired by recent advances in quantum cognition, we show that the sentiment judgment from one modality could be incompatible with the judgment from another, i.e., the order matters and they cannot be jointly measured to produce a final decision. Thus the cognitive process exhibits ``quantum-like'' biases that cannot be captured by classical probability theories. Accordingly, we propose a fundamentally new, quantum cognitively motivated fusion strategy for predicting sentiment judgments. In particular, we formulate utterances as quantum superposition states of positive and negative sentiment judgments, and uni-modal classifiers as mutually incompatible observables, on a complex-valued Hilbert space with positive-operator valued measures. Experiments on two benchmarking datasets illustrate that our model significantly outperforms various existing decision level and a range of state-of-the-art content-level fusion approaches. The results also show that the concept of incompatibility allows effective handling of all combination patterns, including those extreme cases that are wrongly predicted by all uni-modal classifiers.

arXiv:2101.04406•Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence•May 18, 2021•34 citations

Quantum-like Cognition in Process Theories: An Analysis

Sean Tull, Masanao Ozawa

Various effects in human cognition, often considered `non-classical', have been argued to be most naturally modelled by quantum-like models of decision making. We extend this approach to describe models of cognition and decision-making in general probabilistic process theories, which include both classical probabilistic models and quantum instrument models as special cases. We show how many aspects of quantum-like cognition can be described diagrammatically in process theories, before using our approach to assess the arguments for quantum-like models. While standard Bayesian classical models are insufficient, we prove that any sequential decision data can in fact be given a more general form of classical instrument model, and see that even simple deterministic models can exhibit all cognitive effects. Restricting attention to instruments induced by measurements, such as classical Bayesian and quantum POVM models, rules out such a result, but is challenged by the fact that such instruments cannot account for certain effects. Finally, we argue that to strictly rule out classical instrument models one should make use of parallel composition in the modelling of joint decisions, and find real world cognitive data violating Bell inequalities.

q-bio.NCCross-listedarXiv:2604.08604•Apr 9, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Probability — A New Direction for Modeling in Cognitive Science

Sisir Roy

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jul 31, 2014•0 citations
The quantum cognition research programme concerns the application of quantum probability theory(the rules for how to assign probabilities to events from quantum mechanics, without the physics) tocognitive modeling. We review quantum cognitive models in several areas of psychology, includingconjunction/ disjunction fallacies in probabilistic judgment, conceptual combinations, similarity, order effects on judgments, causal inference, the disjunction effect in decision making, measurement and interference effects on judgments and decisions, memory, perception, and other judgment anddecision-making applications. For each area, we first present the empirical findings that have motivated the application of quantum models, emphasizing any characteristics which are particularly puzzling or have resisted coherent theoretical explanations previously; we then discuss the quantum cognitive models, noting the key features of the models that help explain the empirical data; we finally cast a critical eye on the models and explore comparisons with non-quantum models.
Video sentiment analysis as a decision-making process is inherently complex, involving the fusion of decisions from multiple modalities and the so-caused cognitive biases. Inspired by recent advances in quantum cognition, we show that the sentiment judgment from one modality could be incompatible with the judgment from another, i.e., the order matters and they cannot be jointly measured to produce a final decision. Thus the cognitive process exhibits ``quantum-like'' biases that cannot be captured by classical probability theories. Accordingly, we propose a fundamentally new, quantum cognitively motivated fusion strategy for predicting sentiment judgments. In particular, we formulate utterances as quantum superposition states of positive and negative sentiment judgments, and uni-modal classifiers as mutually incompatible observables, on a complex-valued Hilbert space with positive-operator valued measures. Experiments on two benchmarking datasets illustrate that our model significantly outperforms various existing decision level and a range of state-of-the-art content-level fusion approaches. The results also show that the concept of incompatibility allows effective handling of all combination patterns, including those extreme cases that are wrongly predicted by all uni-modal classifiers.
Various effects in human cognition, often considered `non-classical', have been argued to be most naturally modelled by quantum-like models of decision making. We extend this approach to describe models of cognition and decision-making in general probabilistic process theories, which include both classical probabilistic models and quantum instrument models as special cases. We show how many aspects of quantum-like cognition can be described diagrammatically in process theories, before using our approach to assess the arguments for quantum-like models. While standard Bayesian classical models are insufficient, we prove that any sequential decision data can in fact be given a more general form of classical instrument model, and see that even simple deterministic models can exhibit all cognitive effects. Restricting attention to instruments induced by measurements, such as classical Bayesian and quantum POVM models, rules out such a result, but is challenged by the fact that such instruments cannot account for certain effects. Finally, we argue that to strictly rule out classical instrument models one should make use of parallel composition in the modelling of joint decisions, and find real world cognitive data violating Bell inequalities.