Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Biosystems

Quantum contextuality and cognitive contextuality: The significance of violations of Bell-type inequalities

Yoshihiro Maruyama

Published Jul 10, 2021• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104472

Related papers

Violation of Leggett–Garg Inequality in Perceiving Cup-like Objects and Cognitive Contextuality

Likan Zhan, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Yingce Zhu

This paper is devoted to an experimental investigation of cognitive contextuality inspired by quantum contextuality research. This contextuality is related to, but not identical to context-sensitivity which is well-studied in cognitive psychology and decision making. This paper is a part of quantum-like modeling, i.e., exploring the methodology of quantum theory outside of physics. We examined the bistable perception of cup-like objects, which strongly depends on experimental contexts. Our experimental data confirmed the existence of cognitive hysteresis, the important role of memory, and the non-commutative structure of cognitive observables. In physics, quantum contextuality is assessed using Bell-CHSH inequalities, and their violation is incorrectly believed to imply the nonlocality of Nature. The violation of Bell-type inequalities in cognitive and social science strongly indicates that the metaphysical implications of these inequalities are quite limited. In our experiments, modified Leggett-Garg inequalities were also significantly violated, but this only means that experimental data from experiments performed in different contexts cannot be modeled by a unique set of noncontextual, jointly distributed random variables. In our experiments, we know the empirical probability distributions measured in different contexts; thus, we can obtain much more detailed and reliable information about contextuality in human cognition by performing nonparametric compatibility tests.

Entropy•Nov 5, 2024•0 citations

Intraparticle entanglement-based Random Access Code protocols: Contextuality-enabled quantum advantage and implications

Nilaj Saha, Sumit Mukherjee, Dipankar Home

We provide the first explicit identification and quantitative characterization of the physical origin of the quantum advantage in the Random Access Code (RAC) protocol. This is achieved by formulating the protocol in terms of intraparticle entanglement between co-measurable degrees of freedom of a single particle and establishing a fundamental correspondence between the protocol's success probability and the underlying resource powering it. For this purpose, we use a relevant Bell-type inequality derived from the assumption of noncontextuality of measurement outcomes. The formulated analysis reveals that the magnitude of quantum-mechanical violation of this inequality, signifying a form of quantum contextuality, is quantitatively commensurate with the ``quantum enhancement" of success probability in any intraparticle entanglement-assisted $n$-bit RAC protocol. In particular, the maximal success probability achievable in a quantum $n \mapsto 1$ RAC protocol corresponds to the maximal quantum violation of the relevant Bell-type inequality. Our framework not only demonstrates how quantum contextuality entailed by intraparticle entanglement serves as an effective resource for enhancing RAC performance, but also offers a significant operational advantage: the proposed scheme is readily implementable in a single-particle interferometric setup requiring coherence preservation only for a single particle, rather than between spatially separated entangled systems.

quant-pharXiv:2605.13350•May 14, 2026•0 citations

Contextuality Across the Sciences: Bell-Type Theorems in Physics and Cognitive Science

Yoshihiro Maruyama

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2019•5 citations

Analysis of Some Recent Tests of Quantum Contextuality

Brian R. La Cour, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Violation of a Bell-like inequality in single-neutron interferometer experiments: quantum contextuality

Helmut Rauch, Yuji Hasegawa, Rudolf Loidl +2 more

Journal of Modern Optics•May 1, 2004•0 citations

Against Identification of Contextuality with Violation of the Bell Inequalities: Lessons from Theory of Randomness

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

arXiv:2112.03910•Journal of Russian Laser Research•Jan 1, 2022•3 citations
This paper is devoted to an experimental investigation of cognitive contextuality inspired by quantum contextuality research. This contextuality is related to, but not identical to context-sensitivity which is well-studied in cognitive psychology and decision making. This paper is a part of quantum-like modeling, i.e., exploring the methodology of quantum theory outside of physics. We examined the bistable perception of cup-like objects, which strongly depends on experimental contexts. Our experimental data confirmed the existence of cognitive hysteresis, the important role of memory, and the non-commutative structure of cognitive observables. In physics, quantum contextuality is assessed using Bell-CHSH inequalities, and their violation is incorrectly believed to imply the nonlocality of Nature. The violation of Bell-type inequalities in cognitive and social science strongly indicates that the metaphysical implications of these inequalities are quite limited. In our experiments, modified Leggett-Garg inequalities were also significantly violated, but this only means that experimental data from experiments performed in different contexts cannot be modeled by a unique set of noncontextual, jointly distributed random variables. In our experiments, we know the empirical probability distributions measured in different contexts; thus, we can obtain much more detailed and reliable information about contextuality in human cognition by performing nonparametric compatibility tests.
We provide the first explicit identification and quantitative characterization of the physical origin of the quantum advantage in the Random Access Code (RAC) protocol. This is achieved by formulating the protocol in terms of intraparticle entanglement between co-measurable degrees of freedom of a single particle and establishing a fundamental correspondence between the protocol's success probability and the underlying resource powering it. For this purpose, we use a relevant Bell-type inequality derived from the assumption of noncontextuality of measurement outcomes. The formulated analysis reveals that the magnitude of quantum-mechanical violation of this inequality, signifying a form of quantum contextuality, is quantitatively commensurate with the ``quantum enhancement" of success probability in any intraparticle entanglement-assisted nnn-bit RAC protocol. In particular, the maximal success probability achievable in a quantum n↦1n \mapsto 1n↦1 RAC protocol corresponds to the maximal quantum violation of the relevant Bell-type inequality. Our framework not only demonstrates how quantum contextuality entailed by intraparticle entanglement serves as an effective resource for enhancing RAC performance, but also offers a significant operational advantage: the proposed scheme is readily implementable in a single-particle interferometric setup requiring coherence preservation only for a single particle, rather than between spatially separated entangled systems.