Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2112.03910 · Journal of Russian Laser Research

Against Identification of Contextuality with Violation of the Bell Inequalities: Lessons from Theory of Randomness

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Published Jan 1, 2022• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10946-022-10022-9

Related papers

Quantum contextuality and cognitive contextuality: The significance of violations of Bell-type inequalities

Yoshihiro Maruyama

Biosystems•Jul 10, 2021•4 citations

On the applicability of Kolmogorov's theory of probability to the description of quantum phenomena. Part II: Bell inequalities

Maik Reddiger

Among the various "no-go theorems" in the foundations of quantum mechanics, Bell inequalities are among the few, which do not implicitly rely on the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. Instead, Bell inequalities are commonly understood to rest on Kolmogorov's theory of probability and a "locality" assumption. Physical evidence supporting their violation is hence taken as evidence against at least one of these two assumptions. This work provides a comprehensive analysis of the physical debate on Bell inequalities from the point of view of Kolmogorov's theory of probability, focusing on the Bell-Clauser-Horn-Shimony-Holt inequality (BCHSH inequality). The central contribution is the motivation and mathematical study of the notion of contextuality in Bell experiments: in so-called contextual Bell models the detectors themselves behave randomly and the distribution of the random detector parameters depends on the chosen detector settings. It is shown how even "classical" Bell experiments motivate such a description. The need to account for contextuality was pointed out before by de la Peña, Cetto, Brody, Lochak, Bohm, Hiley and others. A broad class of contextual models is proven to satisfy the BCHSH inequality, thereby generalizing a previous result by Gill and Lambare. Nonetheless, even under strong locality requirements, contextual Bell models may violate the BCHSH inequality: based on work by Popescu and Rohrlich, we consider a "proof of concept" example exhibiting the maximum possible violation. Contrary to the much debated "loopholes" in empirical tests of Bell inequalities, contextuality thus reveals a conceptual misunderstanding in the physical conclusions commonly drawn from Bell inequality violations.

quant-pharXiv:2609.31075•Sep 28, 2026•0 citations

Intraparticle entanglement-based Random Access Code protocols: Contextuality-enabled quantum advantage and implications

Nilaj Saha, Sumit Mukherjee, Dipankar Home

We provide the first explicit identification and quantitative characterization of the physical origin of the quantum advantage in the Random Access Code (RAC) protocol. This is achieved by formulating the protocol in terms of intraparticle entanglement between co-measurable degrees of freedom of a single particle and establishing a fundamental correspondence between the protocol's success probability and the underlying resource powering it. For this purpose, we use a relevant Bell-type inequality derived from the assumption of noncontextuality of measurement outcomes. The formulated analysis reveals that the magnitude of quantum-mechanical violation of this inequality, signifying a form of quantum contextuality, is quantitatively commensurate with the ``quantum enhancement" of success probability in any intraparticle entanglement-assisted $n$-bit RAC protocol. In particular, the maximal success probability achievable in a quantum $n \mapsto 1$ RAC protocol corresponds to the maximal quantum violation of the relevant Bell-type inequality. Our framework not only demonstrates how quantum contextuality entailed by intraparticle entanglement serves as an effective resource for enhancing RAC performance, but also offers a significant operational advantage: the proposed scheme is readily implementable in a single-particle interferometric setup requiring coherence preservation only for a single particle, rather than between spatially separated entangled systems.

quant-pharXiv:2605.13350•May 14, 2026•0 citations

The necessity of randomness in tests of Bell inequalities

Adam Bednorz, Jakub Zieliński

Physics Letters A•Jun 30, 2003•1 citation

Is the Contextuality Loophole Fatal for the Derivation of Bell Inequalities?

Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen

It is explained on a physical basis how absence of contextuality allows Bell inequalities to be violated, without bringing an implication on locality or realism. Hereto we connect first to the local realistic theory Stochastic Electrodynamics, and then put the argument more broadly. Thus even if Bell Inequality Violation is demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt, it will have no say on local realism, because absence of contextuality prevents the Bell inequalities to be derived from local realistic models.

Foundations of Physics•May 10, 2010•115 citations

Bell Inequalities, Experimental Protocols and Contextuality

Marian Kupczyński

arXiv:1411.7085•Foundations of Physics•Dec 24, 2014•41 citations
Among the various "no-go theorems" in the foundations of quantum mechanics, Bell inequalities are among the few, which do not implicitly rely on the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. Instead, Bell inequalities are commonly understood to rest on Kolmogorov's theory of probability and a "locality" assumption. Physical evidence supporting their violation is hence taken as evidence against at least one of these two assumptions. This work provides a comprehensive analysis of the physical debate on Bell inequalities from the point of view of Kolmogorov's theory of probability, focusing on the Bell-Clauser-Horn-Shimony-Holt inequality (BCHSH inequality). The central contribution is the motivation and mathematical study of the notion of contextuality in Bell experiments: in so-called contextual Bell models the detectors themselves behave randomly and the distribution of the random detector parameters depends on the chosen detector settings. It is shown how even "classical" Bell experiments motivate such a description. The need to account for contextuality was pointed out before by de la Peña, Cetto, Brody, Lochak, Bohm, Hiley and others. A broad class of contextual models is proven to satisfy the BCHSH inequality, thereby generalizing a previous result by Gill and Lambare. Nonetheless, even under strong locality requirements, contextual Bell models may violate the BCHSH inequality: based on work by Popescu and Rohrlich, we consider a "proof of concept" example exhibiting the maximum possible violation. Contrary to the much debated "loopholes" in empirical tests of Bell inequalities, contextuality thus reveals a conceptual misunderstanding in the physical conclusions commonly drawn from Bell inequality violations.
We provide the first explicit identification and quantitative characterization of the physical origin of the quantum advantage in the Random Access Code (RAC) protocol. This is achieved by formulating the protocol in terms of intraparticle entanglement between co-measurable degrees of freedom of a single particle and establishing a fundamental correspondence between the protocol's success probability and the underlying resource powering it. For this purpose, we use a relevant Bell-type inequality derived from the assumption of noncontextuality of measurement outcomes. The formulated analysis reveals that the magnitude of quantum-mechanical violation of this inequality, signifying a form of quantum contextuality, is quantitatively commensurate with the ``quantum enhancement" of success probability in any intraparticle entanglement-assisted nnn-bit RAC protocol. In particular, the maximal success probability achievable in a quantum n↦1n \mapsto 1n↦1 RAC protocol corresponds to the maximal quantum violation of the relevant Bell-type inequality. Our framework not only demonstrates how quantum contextuality entailed by intraparticle entanglement serves as an effective resource for enhancing RAC performance, but also offers a significant operational advantage: the proposed scheme is readily implementable in a single-particle interferometric setup requiring coherence preservation only for a single particle, rather than between spatially separated entangled systems.
It is explained on a physical basis how absence of contextuality allows Bell inequalities to be violated, without bringing an implication on locality or realism. Hereto we connect first to the local realistic theory Stochastic Electrodynamics, and then put the argument more broadly. Thus even if Bell Inequality Violation is demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt, it will have no say on local realism, because absence of contextuality prevents the Bell inequalities to be derived from local realistic models.