Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

Quantum Probability — A New Direction for Modeling in Cognitive Science

Sisir Roy

Published Jul 31, 2014• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814612470_0010

Related papers

Quantum Ontology: A New Direction for Cognitive Modeling

Sisir Roy

Advances in cognitive neurodynamics•Dec 1, 2014•1 citation

Brain as quantum-like computer

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

We present a contextualist statistical realistic model for quantum-like representations in physics, cognitive science and psychology. We apply this model to describe cognitive experiments to check quantum-like structures of mental processes. The crucial role is played by interference of probabilities for mental observables. Recently one of such experiments based on recognition of images was performed. This experiment confirmed our prediction on quantum-like behaviour of mind. In our approach ``quantumness of mind'' has no direct relation to the fact that the brain (as any physical body) is composed of quantum particles. We invented a new terminology ``quantum-like (QL) mind.'' Cognitive QL-behaviour is characterized by nonzero coefficient of interference $λ.$ This coefficient can be found on the basis of statistical data. There is predicted not only $\cos θ$-interference of probabilities, but also hyperbolic $\cosh θ$-interference. This interference was never observed for physical systems, but we could not exclude this possibility for cognitive systems. We propose a model of brain functioning as QL-computer (there is discussed difference between quantum and QL computers).

arXiv:quant-ph/0205092•May 15, 2002•5 citations

Cognitive science: Quantum models of inference

Stavroula T. Kousta

Nature Human Behaviour•Jul 28, 2017•0 citations

What's the predicted outcome? Explanatory and predictive properties of the quantum probability framework

Timothy Joseph Pleskac, Peter D. Kvam, Shuli Yu

Quantum probability (QP) provides a new perspective for cognitive science. However, one must be clear about the outcome the QP model is predicting. We discuss this concern in reference to modeling the subjective probabilities given by people as opposed to modeling the choice proportions of people. These two models would appear to have different cognitive assumptions.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences•May 14, 2013•4 citations

Statistical and subjective interpretations of probability in quantum-like models of cognition and decision making

Emmanuel E. Haven, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Journal of Mathematical Psychology•Mar 9, 2016•38 citations

Quantum Probability for Modeling Cognition, Decision Making, and Artificial Intelligence

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics•Jan 1, 2022•1 citation
We present a contextualist statistical realistic model for quantum-like representations in physics, cognitive science and psychology. We apply this model to describe cognitive experiments to check quantum-like structures of mental processes. The crucial role is played by interference of probabilities for mental observables. Recently one of such experiments based on recognition of images was performed. This experiment confirmed our prediction on quantum-like behaviour of mind. In our approach ``quantumness of mind'' has no direct relation to the fact that the brain (as any physical body) is composed of quantum particles. We invented a new terminology ``quantum-like (QL) mind.'' Cognitive QL-behaviour is characterized by nonzero coefficient of interference λ.λ.λ. This coefficient can be found on the basis of statistical data. There is predicted not only cos⁡θ\cos θcosθ-interference of probabilities, but also hyperbolic cosh⁡θ\cosh θcoshθ-interference. This interference was never observed for physical systems, but we could not exclude this possibility for cognitive systems. We propose a model of brain functioning as QL-computer (there is discussed difference between quantum and QL computers).