Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Statistical and subjective interpretations of probability in quantum-like models of cognition and decision making

Emmanuel E. Haven, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Published Mar 9, 2016• 38 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.jmp.2016.02.005

Related papers

Quantum Probability for Modeling Cognition, Decision Making, and Artificial Intelligence

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics•Jan 1, 2022•1 citation

Quantum-like Cognition and Decision Making: Interpretation of Phases in Quantum-like Superposition

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

QUANTUM-LIKE MODELS FOR DECISION MAKING IN PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Quantum Bio-Informatics•Feb 1, 2009•1 citation

Quantum Bayesianism as the basis of general theory of decision-making

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

We discuss the subjective probability interpretation of the quantum-like approach to decision making and more generally to cognition. Our aim is to adopt the subjective probability interpretation of quantum mechanics, quantum Bayesianism (QBism), to serve quantum-like modelling and applications of quantum probability outside of physics. We analyse the classical and quantum probabilistic schemes of probability update, learning and decision-making and emphasize the role of Jeffrey conditioning and its quantum generalizations. Classically, this type of conditioning and corresponding probability update is based on the formula of total probability-one the basic laws of classical probability theory.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Apr 19, 2016•54 citations

QBism: Subjective Probabilistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

This chapter is devoted to quantum Bayesianism (QBism), the subjective probability interpretation of QM. Creation of such an interpretation is an important step towards unification of applications of the mathematical formalism of QM to physical and to cognitive and sociopolitical systems. QBism can serve to couple the general theory of decision making based on subjective probability with quantum formalism. On the other hand, our quantum-like modeling of sociopolitical processes does not depend on interpretations of QM. Therefore, the reader need not read this chapter, which has a merely foundational value.

•Jul 30, 2020•0 citations

Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision

William H. Batchelder, Hans Colonius, Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 14, 2018•0 citations
We discuss the subjective probability interpretation of the quantum-like approach to decision making and more generally to cognition. Our aim is to adopt the subjective probability interpretation of quantum mechanics, quantum Bayesianism (QBism), to serve quantum-like modelling and applications of quantum probability outside of physics. We analyse the classical and quantum probabilistic schemes of probability update, learning and decision-making and emphasize the role of Jeffrey conditioning and its quantum generalizations. Classically, this type of conditioning and corresponding probability update is based on the formula of total probability-one the basic laws of classical probability theory.
This chapter is devoted to quantum Bayesianism (QBism), the subjective probability interpretation of QM. Creation of such an interpretation is an important step towards unification of applications of the mathematical formalism of QM to physical and to cognitive and sociopolitical systems. QBism can serve to couple the general theory of decision making based on subjective probability with quantum formalism. On the other hand, our quantum-like modeling of sociopolitical processes does not depend on interpretations of QM. Therefore, the reader need not read this chapter, which has a merely foundational value.