Physical Review Letters

Gopalakrishnan, Martin, and Demler Reply:

Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Ivar Martin, Eugene Demler

Published Aug 13, 2014• 2 citations

Abstract

A Reply to the Comments by M. Sandbrink et al. and R. Lifshitz.

Reply to the comment by C.Camacho on PRL, v.77, p.5433

Alexander Gutin, Victor Abkevich, Eugene I. Shakhnovich

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

Remarks on reply to Johansen's comment

Anders Sewerin Johansen

Remarks on reply (cond-mat/0206368) to Johansen's comment (cond-mat/0205249)

Luis and Sánchez-Soto Reply:

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

A Reply to the Comment by Englert, Scully, and Walther.

Scarcelli, Berardi, and Shih Reply:

Giuliano Scarcelli, V. Berardi, Yanhua H. Shih

A Reply to the Comment by A. Gatti et al..

Zabala, Puska, and Nieminen Reply:

Nerea Zabala, Martti J. Puska, R. M. Nieminen

A Reply to the Comment by Oleg A. Starykh and Dmitrii L. Maslov.

Hove and Sudbø Reply:

J. Hove, Asle Sudbø

A short Reply to the Comment of Prokof'ev and Svistunov, cond-mat/0504008, is given.