Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Luis and Sánchez-Soto Reply:

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

Published Feb 28, 2000• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A Reply to the Comment by Englert, Scully, and Walther.
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.84.2041

Related papers

Reply to the comment by C.Camacho on PRL, v.77, p.5433

Alexander Gutin, Victor Abkevich, Eugene I. Shakhnovich

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

arXiv:cond-mat/9703230•Mar 26, 1997•0 citations

Gopalakrishnan, Martin, and Demler Reply:

Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Ivar Martin, Eugene Demler

A Reply to the Comments by M. Sandbrink et al. and R. Lifshitz.

Physical Review Letters•Aug 13, 2014•2 citations

Scarcelli, Berardi, and Shih Reply:

Giuliano Scarcelli, V. Berardi, Yanhua H. Shih

A Reply to the Comment by A. Gatti et al..

Physical Review Letters•Jan 17, 2007•25 citations

Remarks on reply to Johansen's comment

Anders Sewerin Johansen

Remarks on reply (cond-mat/0206368) to Johansen's comment (cond-mat/0205249)

arXiv:cond-mat/0206479•Jun 25, 2002•2 citations

Zabala, Puska, and Nieminen Reply:

Nerea Zabala, Martti J. Puska, R. M. Nieminen

A Reply to the Comment by Oleg A. Starykh and Dmitrii L. Maslov.

Physical Review Letters•Apr 5, 1999•7 citations

Bonn, Wegdam, and Schall Reply:

Daniel Bonn, Gerard H. Wegdam, Peter Schall

A Reply to the Comment by Andrea Gambassi and S. Dietrich.

Physical Review Letters•Jul 29, 2010•24 citations