Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

European Journal of Physics

Eigenvalues j ( j + 1) of and the uncertainty principle

Donald H. Kobe

Published Mar 1, 1998• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The eigenvalue j(j + 1) of the total angular momentum operator squared follows from the commutation relations for angular momentum. An alternative proof is given based on the uncertainty relation for the angular momentum components and . For expectation values in the state , the uncertainty relation holds as an equality and is used in the proof.

DOI
10.1088/0143-0807/19/2/003

Related papers

Angular Momentum

Gary E. Bowman

Angular momentum is one of the more abstract topics in quantum mechanics. This chapter begins with a review of classical angular momentum. Quantum-mechanical angular momentum is then introduced by obtaining operators from their classical counterparts. The commutation relations amongst those operators and the corresponding uncertainty relations then follow. Eigenstates and eigenvalues of the angular momentum operators are then introduced (but not derived). From these follow the raising and lowering operators. Physical meaning is imparted to quantum angular momentum by considering predictions for sequential measurements, and by comparing the conceptual pictures of angular momentum in classical and quantum mechanics. Finally, quantum spin and orbital angular momenta, and the deep differences between them, are discussed.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Nov 1, 2007•0 citations

Critical comments on the quantization of the angular momentum: II. Analysis based on the requirement that the eigenfunction of the third component of the operator of the angular momentum must be a single valued periodic function

G. S. Japaridze, Anzor Khelashvili, K. Sh. Turashvili

We discuss the requirement of single valuedness and periodicity of eigenfunction of the third component of the operator of angular momentum. This condition, imposed on a non observable, is often used to derive that the eigenvalues of angular momentum could be only integer. We reexamine the arguments based on this requirement and alternate condition imposed by Pauli and show that they do not follow from the first principles and therefore these constraints can dropped. Consequently, we arrive to the same conclusion as in [1]: there exist regular, normalizable eigenfunctions with the non-integer eigenvalues thus a non-integer angular momentum is perfectly admissible from the theoretical viewpoint. The issue of the nature of eigenvalues forming the spectrum of the angular momentum remains open. What can be derived from the first principles is that to a fixed value of the angular momentum L corresponds a discrete spectrum of eigenvalues of the third component of the angular momentum, m, defined by the relation |m|=L-k, k=0,1,...,[L], where [L] is an integer part of L. As a mathematical byproduct of our analysis of eigenfunctions, we present an alternate definition of a power of a complex number allowing to retain initial translational invariance of a base.

arXiv:2004.10673•Apr 17, 2020•1 citation

Critical comments on quantization of the angular momentum: I. Analysis based on the physical requirement on eigenfunctions and on the commutation relations

G. S. Japaridze, Anzor Khelashvili, K. Sh. Turashvili

Eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the operator of the square of the angular momentum are studied. It is shown that neither from the requirement for the eigenfunctions be normalizable nor from the commutation relations it is possible to prove that the eigenvalues spectrum is a set of only integer numbers (in units $\hbar=1$). We present regular, normalizable eigenfunctions with the non-integer eigenvalues thus demonstrating that a non-integer angular momentum is admissible from the theoretical viewpoint.

arXiv:1912.08042•Dec 4, 2019•1 citation

- Angular Momentum I

Alastair I. M. Rae, Jim Napolitano

Angular momentum is a very important and revealing property of many physical systems. In classical mechanics the principle of conservation of angular momentum is a powerful aid to the solution of such problems as the orbits of planets and satellites and the behaviour of gyroscopes and tops. The role of angular momentum in quantum mechanics is probably even more important and this will be the subject of the present chapter and the next. We shall find that the operators representing the components of angular momentum do not commute with each other, although they all commute with the operator representing the total angular momentum. It follows that no pair of these components can be measured compatibly and we shall therefore look for a set of eigenfunctions that are common to the operators representing the total angular momentum and one of its components. We shall find that the angular momentum eigenvalues always form a discrete set and that, in the case of a central field, the operators commute with the Hamiltonian, implying that the total angular momentum and one component can be measured compatibly with the energy in this case, so that their values, once measured, remain constant in time. Consideration of angular momentum will also enable us to make predictions about the behaviour of atoms in magnetic fields, and we shall find that these are in agreement with experiment only if we assume that the electron (in common with many other fundamental particles) has an intrinsic “spin” angular momentum in addition to the “orbital” angular momentum associated with its motion. The interaction between spin and orbital angular momenta leads to detailed features of the atomic spectra which are known as “fine structure.” We shall also use the measurement of angular momentum to illustrate the quantum theory of measurement discussed in the previous chapter.

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 16, 2015•0 citations

Uncertainty principle for angular position and angular momentum

Sonja Franke‐Arnold, Stephen Mark Barnett, Eric Yao +3 more

The uncertainty principle places fundamental limits on the accuracy with which we are able to measure the values of different physical quantities (Heisenberg 1949 The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory (New York: Dover); Robertson 1929 Phys. Rev. 34 127). This has profound effects not only on the microscopic but also on the macroscopic level of physical systems. The most familiar form of the uncertainty principle relates the uncertainties in position and linear momentum. Other manifestations include those relating uncertainty in energy to uncertainty in time duration, phase of an electromagnetic field to photon number and angular position to angular momentum (Vaccaro and Pegg 1990 J. Mod. Opt. 37 17; Barnett and Pegg 1990 Phys. Rev. A 41 3427). In this paper, we report the first observation of the last of these uncertainty relations and derive the associated states that satisfy the equality in the uncertainty relation. We confirm the form of these states by detailed measurement of the angular momentum of a light beam after passage through an appropriate angular aperture. The angular uncertainty principle applies to all physical systems and is particularly important for systems with cylindrical symmetry.

New Journal of Physics•Aug 9, 2004•265 citations

Uncertainty relations for angular momentum eigenstates in two and three spatial dimensions

Christian Bracher

I reexamine Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation for two- and three-dimensional wave packets with fixed angular momentum quantum numbers m or ℓ. A simple proof shows that the product of the average extent Δr and Δp of a two-dimensional wave packet in position and momentum space is bounded from below by ΔrΔp≥ℏ(|m|+1). The minimum uncertainty is attained by modified Gaussian wave packets that are special eigenstates of the two-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator, which include the ground states of electrons in a uniform magnetic field. Similarly, the inequality ΔrΔp≥ℏ(ℓ+3/2) holds for three-dimensional wave packets with fixed total angular momentum ℓ and the equality holds for a Gaussian radial profile. I also discuss some applications of these uncertainty relations.

American Journal of Physics•Feb 16, 2011•13 citations
The eigenvalue j(j + 1) of the total angular momentum operator squared follows from the commutation relations for angular momentum. An alternative proof is given based on the uncertainty relation for the angular momentum components and . For expectation values in the state , the uncertainty relation holds as an equality and is used in the proof.
Angular momentum is one of the more abstract topics in quantum mechanics. This chapter begins with a review of classical angular momentum. Quantum-mechanical angular momentum is then introduced by obtaining operators from their classical counterparts. The commutation relations amongst those operators and the corresponding uncertainty relations then follow. Eigenstates and eigenvalues of the angular momentum operators are then introduced (but not derived). From these follow the raising and lowering operators. Physical meaning is imparted to quantum angular momentum by considering predictions for sequential measurements, and by comparing the conceptual pictures of angular momentum in classical and quantum mechanics. Finally, quantum spin and orbital angular momenta, and the deep differences between them, are discussed.
We discuss the requirement of single valuedness and periodicity of eigenfunction of the third component of the operator of angular momentum. This condition, imposed on a non observable, is often used to derive that the eigenvalues of angular momentum could be only integer. We reexamine the arguments based on this requirement and alternate condition imposed by Pauli and show that they do not follow from the first principles and therefore these constraints can dropped. Consequently, we arrive to the same conclusion as in [1]: there exist regular, normalizable eigenfunctions with the non-integer eigenvalues thus a non-integer angular momentum is perfectly admissible from the theoretical viewpoint. The issue of the nature of eigenvalues forming the spectrum of the angular momentum remains open. What can be derived from the first principles is that to a fixed value of the angular momentum L corresponds a discrete spectrum of eigenvalues of the third component of the angular momentum, m, defined by the relation |m|=L-k, k=0,1,...,[L], where [L] is an integer part of L. As a mathematical byproduct of our analysis of eigenfunctions, we present an alternate definition of a power of a complex number allowing to retain initial translational invariance of a base.
Eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the operator of the square of the angular momentum are studied. It is shown that neither from the requirement for the eigenfunctions be normalizable nor from the commutation relations it is possible to prove that the eigenvalues spectrum is a set of only integer numbers (in units ℏ=1\hbar=1ℏ=1). We present regular, normalizable eigenfunctions with the non-integer eigenvalues thus demonstrating that a non-integer angular momentum is admissible from the theoretical viewpoint.
Angular momentum is a very important and revealing property of many physical systems. In classical mechanics the principle of conservation of angular momentum is a powerful aid to the solution of such problems as the orbits of planets and satellites and the behaviour of gyroscopes and tops. The role of angular momentum in quantum mechanics is probably even more important and this will be the subject of the present chapter and the next. We shall find that the operators representing the components of angular momentum do not commute with each other, although they all commute with the operator representing the total angular momentum. It follows that no pair of these components can be measured compatibly and we shall therefore look for a set of eigenfunctions that are common to the operators representing the total angular momentum and one of its components. We shall find that the angular momentum eigenvalues always form a discrete set and that, in the case of a central field, the operators commute with the Hamiltonian, implying that the total angular momentum and one component can be measured compatibly with the energy in this case, so that their values, once measured, remain constant in time. Consideration of angular momentum will also enable us to make predictions about the behaviour of atoms in magnetic fields, and we shall find that these are in agreement with experiment only if we assume that the electron (in common with many other fundamental particles) has an intrinsic “spin” angular momentum in addition to the “orbital” angular momentum associated with its motion. The interaction between spin and orbital angular momenta leads to detailed features of the atomic spectra which are known as “fine structure.” We shall also use the measurement of angular momentum to illustrate the quantum theory of measurement discussed in the previous chapter.
The uncertainty principle places fundamental limits on the accuracy with which we are able to measure the values of different physical quantities (Heisenberg 1949 The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory (New York: Dover); Robertson 1929 Phys. Rev. 34 127). This has profound effects not only on the microscopic but also on the macroscopic level of physical systems. The most familiar form of the uncertainty principle relates the uncertainties in position and linear momentum. Other manifestations include those relating uncertainty in energy to uncertainty in time duration, phase of an electromagnetic field to photon number and angular position to angular momentum (Vaccaro and Pegg 1990 J. Mod. Opt. 37 17; Barnett and Pegg 1990 Phys. Rev. A 41 3427). In this paper, we report the first observation of the last of these uncertainty relations and derive the associated states that satisfy the equality in the uncertainty relation. We confirm the form of these states by detailed measurement of the angular momentum of a light beam after passage through an appropriate angular aperture. The angular uncertainty principle applies to all physical systems and is particularly important for systems with cylindrical symmetry.
I reexamine Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation for two- and three-dimensional wave packets with fixed angular momentum quantum numbers m or ℓ. A simple proof shows that the product of the average extent Δr and Δp of a two-dimensional wave packet in position and momentum space is bounded from below by ΔrΔp≥ℏ(|m|+1). The minimum uncertainty is attained by modified Gaussian wave packets that are special eigenstates of the two-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator, which include the ground states of electrons in a uniform magnetic field. Similarly, the inequality ΔrΔp≥ℏ(ℓ+3/2) holds for three-dimensional wave packets with fixed total angular momentum ℓ and the equality holds for a Gaussian radial profile. I also discuss some applications of these uncertainty relations.