© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

New Journal of Physics

Uncertainty principle for angular position and angular momentum

Sonja Franke‐Arnold, Stephen Mark Barnett, Eric Yao, Jonathan Leach, Johannes Courtial, Miles J. Padgett

Published Aug 9, 2004• 265 citations

Abstract

The uncertainty principle places fundamental limits on the accuracy with which we are able to measure the values of different physical quantities (Heisenberg 1949 The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory (New York: Dover); Robertson 1929 Phys. Rev. 34 127). This has profound effects not only on the microscopic but also on the macroscopic level of physical systems. The most familiar form of the uncertainty principle relates the uncertainties in position and linear momentum. Other manifestations include those relating uncertainty in energy to uncertainty in time duration, phase of an electromagnetic field to photon number and angular position to angular momentum (Vaccaro and Pegg 1990 J. Mod. Opt. 37 17; Barnett and Pegg 1990 Phys. Rev. A 41 3427). In this paper, we report the first observation of the last of these uncertainty relations and derive the associated states that satisfy the equality in the uncertainty relation. We confirm the form of these states by detailed measurement of the angular momentum of a light beam after passage through an appropriate angular aperture. The angular uncertainty principle applies to all physical systems and is particularly important for systems with cylindrical symmetry.

DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/103

Related papers

Minimum uncertainty states of angular momentum and angular position

David Thomas Pegg, Stephen Mark Barnett, Roberta Zambrini +2 more

The states of linear momentum that satisfy the equality in the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for position and momentum, that is the intelligent states, are also the states that minimize the uncertainty product for position and momentum. The corresponding uncertainty relation for angular momentum and angular position, however, is more complicated and the intelligent states need not be the constrained minimum uncertainty product states. In this paper, we investigate the differences between the intelligent and the constrained minimum uncertainty product states for the angular case by means of instructive approximations, a numerical iterative search and the exact solution. We find that these differences can be quite significant for particular values of angular position uncertainty and indeed may be amenable to experimental measurement with the present technology.

New Journal of Physics•Feb 17, 2005•41 citations

Angular performance measure for tighter uncertainty relations

Z. Hradil, Jaroslav Řeháček, A. B. Klimov +2 more

The uncertainty principle places a fundamental limit on the accuracy with which we can measure conjugate quantities. However, the fluctuations of these variables can be assessed in terms of different estimators. We propose an angular performance that allows for tighter uncertainty relations for angle and angular momentum. The differences with previous bounds can be significant for particular states and indeed may be amenable to experimental measurement with the present technology.

arXiv:0910.4670•Physical Review A•Jan 21, 2010•11 citations

Uncertainty Principle

F.J. Duarte

R. P. Feynman, by far, physics’ most successful communicator, said: The uncertainty principle protects quantum mechanics. W. Heisenberg recognized that if it were possible to measure the momentum and the position simultaneously with a greater accuracy, quantum mechanics would collapse. Quantum mechanics maintains its perilous but correct existence”. In his book on Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , Feynman makes use of the two-slit experiment to provide an approximate description of the physics behind the uncertainty principle. Feynman’s description is outlined using a slightly different notation. The uncertainty principle is widely applied in optics. It applies to interferometry, linewidth measurements, and beam divergence measurements. The chapter focuses on the uncertainty principle and beam divergence. An important application of the uncertainty principle manifests itself in calculations of the angular resolution limit of telescopes used in astronomical observations. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be used to derive some useful identities in optics and interferometry.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 29, 2013•0 citations

Large-uncertainty intelligent states for angular momentum and angle

Jörg B. Götte, Roberta Zambrini, Sonja Franke‐Arnold +1 more

The equality in the uncertainty principle for linear momentum and position is obtained for states which also minimize the uncertainty product. However, in the uncertainty relation for angular momentum and angular position both sides of the inequality are state dependent and therefore the intelligent states, which satisfy the equality, do not necessarily give a minimum for the uncertainty product. In this paper, we highlight the difference between intelligent states and minimum uncertainty states by investigating a class of intelligent states which obey the equality in the angular uncertainty relation while having an arbitrarily large uncertainty product. To develop an understanding for the uncertainties of angle and angular momentum for the large-uncertainty intelligent states we compare exact solutions with analytical approximations in two limiting cases.

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Nov 15, 2005•7 citations

Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is usually taken to express a limitation of operational possibilities imposed by quantum mechanics.Here we demonstrate that the full content of this principle also includes its positive role as a condition ensuring that mutually exclusive experimental options can be reconciled if an appropriate trade-off is accepted.The uncertainty principle is shown to appear in three manifestations, in the form of uncertainty relations: for the widths of the position and momentum distributions in any quantum state; for the inaccuracies of any joint measurement of these quantities; and for the inaccuracy of a measurement of one of the quantities and the ensuing disturbance in the distribution of the other quantity.Whilst conceptually distinct, these three kinds of uncertainty relations are shown to be closely related formally.Finally, we survey models and experimental implementations of joint measurements of position and momentum and comment briefly on the status of experimental tests of the uncertainty principle.

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•May 1, 2000•0 citations

Exact uncertainty relations: technical details

Michael J. W. Hall

The Heisenberg inequality ΔX ΔP \geq \hbar/2 can be replaced by an exact equality, for suitably chosen measures of position and momentum uncertainty, which is valid for all wavefunctions. The significance of this "exact" uncertainty relation is discussed, and results are generalised to angular momentum and phase, photon number and phase, time and frequency, and to states described by density operators. Connections to optimal estimation of an observable from the measurement of a second observable, Wigner functions, energy bounds, and entanglement are also given.

arXiv:quant-ph/0103072•Mar 14, 2001•0 citations

The uncertainty principle places fundamental limits on the accuracy with which we are able to measure the values of different physical quantities (Heisenberg 1949 The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory (New York: Dover); Robertson 1929 Phys. Rev. 34 127). This has profound effects not only on the microscopic but also on the macroscopic level of physical systems. The most familiar form of the uncertainty principle relates the uncertainties in position and linear momentum. Other manifestations include those relating uncertainty in energy to uncertainty in time duration, phase of an electromagnetic field to photon number and angular position to angular momentum (Vaccaro and Pegg 1990 J. Mod. Opt. 37 17; Barnett and Pegg 1990 Phys. Rev. A 41 3427). In this paper, we report the first observation of the last of these uncertainty relations and derive the associated states that satisfy the equality in the uncertainty relation. We confirm the form of these states by detailed measurement of the angular momentum of a light beam after passage through an appropriate angular aperture. The angular uncertainty principle applies to all physical systems and is particularly important for systems with cylindrical symmetry.

The states of linear momentum that satisfy the equality in the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for position and momentum, that is the intelligent states, are also the states that minimize the uncertainty product for position and momentum. The corresponding uncertainty relation for angular momentum and angular position, however, is more complicated and the intelligent states need not be the constrained minimum uncertainty product states. In this paper, we investigate the differences between the intelligent and the constrained minimum uncertainty product states for the angular case by means of instructive approximations, a numerical iterative search and the exact solution. We find that these differences can be quite significant for particular values of angular position uncertainty and indeed may be amenable to experimental measurement with the present technology.

R. P. Feynman, by far, physics’ most successful communicator, said: The uncertainty principle protects quantum mechanics. W. Heisenberg recognized that if it were possible to measure the momentum and the position simultaneously with a greater accuracy, quantum mechanics would collapse. Quantum mechanics maintains its perilous but correct existence”. In his book on Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , Feynman makes use of the two-slit experiment to provide an approximate description of the physics behind the uncertainty principle. Feynman’s description is outlined using a slightly different notation. The uncertainty principle is widely applied in optics. It applies to interferometry, linewidth measurements, and beam divergence measurements. The chapter focuses on the uncertainty principle and beam divergence. An important application of the uncertainty principle manifests itself in calculations of the angular resolution limit of telescopes used in astronomical observations. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be used to derive some useful identities in optics and interferometry.

The equality in the uncertainty principle for linear momentum and position is obtained for states which also minimize the uncertainty product. However, in the uncertainty relation for angular momentum and angular position both sides of the inequality are state dependent and therefore the intelligent states, which satisfy the equality, do not necessarily give a minimum for the uncertainty product. In this paper, we highlight the difference between intelligent states and minimum uncertainty states by investigating a class of intelligent states which obey the equality in the angular uncertainty relation while having an arbitrarily large uncertainty product. To develop an understanding for the uncertainties of angle and angular momentum for the large-uncertainty intelligent states we compare exact solutions with analytical approximations in two limiting cases.

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is usually taken to express a limitation of operational possibilities imposed by quantum mechanics.Here we demonstrate that the full content of this principle also includes its positive role as a condition ensuring that mutually exclusive experimental options can be reconciled if an appropriate trade-off is accepted.The uncertainty principle is shown to appear in three manifestations, in the form of uncertainty relations: for the widths of the position and momentum distributions in any quantum state; for the inaccuracies of any joint measurement of these quantities; and for the inaccuracy of a measurement of one of the quantities and the ensuing disturbance in the distribution of the other quantity.Whilst conceptually distinct, these three kinds of uncertainty relations are shown to be closely related formally.Finally, we survey models and experimental implementations of joint measurements of position and momentum and comment briefly on the status of experimental tests of the uncertainty principle.

The Heisenberg inequality ΔX ΔP \geq \hbar/2 can be replaced by an exact equality, for suitably chosen measures of position and momentum uncertainty, which is valid for all wavefunctions. The significance of this "exact" uncertainty relation is discussed, and results are generalised to angular momentum and phase, photon number and phase, time and frequency, and to states described by density operators. Connections to optimal estimation of an observable from the measurement of a second observable, Wigner functions, energy bounds, and entanglement are also given.