Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Self-adjointness and spontaneously broken symmetry

ANTON Z. CAPRI

Published Sep 1, 1977• 28 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The notion of self-adjointness as distinct from Hermiticity is usually avoided in elementary quantum mechanics courses due to a feeling that it has nothing to do with physics or else is too mathematical. This is definitely not the case, and we use the model of a free particle restricted to motion on a line over a finite interval, to demonstrate this. For such a particle, there is one-parameter infinity of self-adjoint extensions of the momentum operator. We use one of these, corresponding to ’’antiperiodic’’ boundary conditions, to show that physical phenomena different from the usual case (periodic boundary conditions) occur. In fact, in this case, we have a model displaying many of the properties of spontaneously broken symmetry.

DOI
10.1119/1.11055

Related papers

Self-Adjointness and the Renormalization of Singular Potentials

Sarang Gopalakrishnan, William Loinaz

Schrodinger operators with very singular potentials fail to produce reasonable spectra, because the usual boundary conditions are insufficient to make them self-adjoint. If one regularizes a singular potential at a length , the bound state energies diverge as → 0. A meaningful spectrum can be restored by picking a self-adjoint extension of the operator, by renormalizing the theory, or by allowing nonunitary time evolution. We show that renormalizations of the 1/r potential fall into two classes: those that are asymptotically equivalent to self-adjoint extensions, and those that reduce to treatments of delta functions. We also apply the apparatus of self-adjoint extensions and renormalization to clarify aspects of anomalous symmetry breaking, supersymmetric quantum mechanics, and one-dimensional quantum mechanics. Lines composed upon reading a thesis abstract by S. Gopalakrishnan Think a moment, dear reader, of that long-legged fly, The sprung meniscus underfoot, And what asymptotes invisible to well-trained eyes Still break the surface at its root. How a singular potential picks tight-bounded energy Apart till it no longer recognizes Its own mirrored face, its extensions, or symmetry; Unless one cautiously renormalizes. You have tried in these pensive pages to show the stuff Such theory’s made of, its quiddity When logic is applied to the diamond rough, And quantum notes ring purely. May Apollo’s clarity pierce through your reasoning And self-adjointed truth and fact Elevate your thought to that sense so pleasing When truth recovers nature’s pact.

•Jan 1, 2006•12 citations

A Física das extensões autoadjuntas: partícula na caixa

Matheus Curado Ferreira

In this paper we will use techniques developed in Mathematical Physics, to try to clarify some questions about one of the most elementary problems addressed in undergraduate Physics courses, usually in the discipline of Quantum Mechanics. When we subject a one dimensional confined particle to the most general boundary conditions possible, negative energy states arise. What are these states? Since there is no interaction with any potential wells. We show a study about the physics of self-adjoint extensions of symmetric operators, and in consequence develop a proposal to explain such phenomenon.

•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Self-adjoint extensions of operators and the teaching of quantum mechanics

Guy Bonneau, Jacques Faraut, Galliano Valent A

For the example of the infinite well potential, we point out some paradoxes which are solved by a careful analysis of what is a truly self-adjoint operator. We then describe the self-adjoint extensions and their spectra for the momentum and the Hamiltonian operators in different settings. Additional physical requirements such as parity, time reversal, and positivity are used to restrict the large class of self-adjoint extensions of the Hamiltonian.

arXiv:quant-ph/0103153•American Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 2001•313 citations

The time-dependent Schrödinger equation: the need for the Hamiltonian to be self-adjoint

Vanilse S. Araujo, Francisco Antônio Bezerra Coutinho, F. Masafumi Toyama

We present some simple arguments to show that quantum mechanics operators are required to be self-adjoint. We emphasize that the very definition of a self-adjoint operator includes the prescription of a certain domain of the operator. We then use these concepts to revisit the solutions of the time-dependent Schroedinger equation of some well-known simple problems - the infinite square well, the finite square well, and the harmonic oscillator. We show that these elementary illustrations can be enriched by using more general boundary conditions, which are still compatible with self-adjointness. In particular, we show that a puzzling problem associated with the Hydrogen atom in one dimension can be clarified by applying the correct requirements of self-adjointness. We then come to Stone\'s theorem, which is the main topic of this paper, and which is shown to relate the usual definitions of a self-adjoint operator to the possibility of constructing well-defined solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.

Brazilian Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 2008•13 citations

Observables in Quantum Mechanics and the Importance of Self-Adjointness

Tajron Jurić

We are focused on the idea that observables in quantum physics are a bit more then just hermitian operators and that this is, in general, a “tricky business”. The origin of this idea comes from the fact that there is a subtle difference between symmetric, hermitian, and self-adjoint operators which are of immense importance in formulating Quantum Mechanics. The theory of self-adjoint extensions is presented through several physical examples and some emphasis is given on the physical implications and applications.

arXiv:2103.01080•Universe•Feb 17, 2022•15 citations

Introduction

Jan Nesemann

In the theory of quantum mechanics the Hamiltonian H is typically selfadjoint, i.e., H = H *. The self-adjointness ensures that the spectrum of the Hamiltonian, representing the energy spectrum of H , is real but it is not a necessary condition. In the literature on so-called PT -symmetric quantum mechanics (see, e.g., [BB98], [BBM99], [BBJ03], [Ben04b] and [Ben07]), it is believed that self-adjointness is rather a mathematical requirement than a physically established fact. Therefore, it was considered a surprise that operators exist which are not self-adjoint in the given quantum mechanical Hilbert space, but have real spectrum and that – if e.g. complex eigenvalues were present – they occurred only in complex conjugate pairs.

Vieweg+Teubner eBooks•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations
The notion of self-adjointness as distinct from Hermiticity is usually avoided in elementary quantum mechanics courses due to a feeling that it has nothing to do with physics or else is too mathematical. This is definitely not the case, and we use the model of a free particle restricted to motion on a line over a finite interval, to demonstrate this. For such a particle, there is one-parameter infinity of self-adjoint extensions of the momentum operator. We use one of these, corresponding to ’’antiperiodic’’ boundary conditions, to show that physical phenomena different from the usual case (periodic boundary conditions) occur. In fact, in this case, we have a model displaying many of the properties of spontaneously broken symmetry.
Schrodinger operators with very singular potentials fail to produce reasonable spectra, because the usual boundary conditions are insufficient to make them self-adjoint. If one regularizes a singular potential at a length , the bound state energies diverge as → 0. A meaningful spectrum can be restored by picking a self-adjoint extension of the operator, by renormalizing the theory, or by allowing nonunitary time evolution. We show that renormalizations of the 1/r potential fall into two classes: those that are asymptotically equivalent to self-adjoint extensions, and those that reduce to treatments of delta functions. We also apply the apparatus of self-adjoint extensions and renormalization to clarify aspects of anomalous symmetry breaking, supersymmetric quantum mechanics, and one-dimensional quantum mechanics. Lines composed upon reading a thesis abstract by S. Gopalakrishnan Think a moment, dear reader, of that long-legged fly, The sprung meniscus underfoot, And what asymptotes invisible to well-trained eyes Still break the surface at its root. How a singular potential picks tight-bounded energy Apart till it no longer recognizes Its own mirrored face, its extensions, or symmetry; Unless one cautiously renormalizes. You have tried in these pensive pages to show the stuff Such theory’s made of, its quiddity When logic is applied to the diamond rough, And quantum notes ring purely. May Apollo’s clarity pierce through your reasoning And self-adjointed truth and fact Elevate your thought to that sense so pleasing When truth recovers nature’s pact.
In this paper we will use techniques developed in Mathematical Physics, to try to clarify some questions about one of the most elementary problems addressed in undergraduate Physics courses, usually in the discipline of Quantum Mechanics. When we subject a one dimensional confined particle to the most general boundary conditions possible, negative energy states arise. What are these states? Since there is no interaction with any potential wells. We show a study about the physics of self-adjoint extensions of symmetric operators, and in consequence develop a proposal to explain such phenomenon.
We present some simple arguments to show that quantum mechanics operators are required to be self-adjoint. We emphasize that the very definition of a self-adjoint operator includes the prescription of a certain domain of the operator. We then use these concepts to revisit the solutions of the time-dependent Schroedinger equation of some well-known simple problems - the infinite square well, the finite square well, and the harmonic oscillator. We show that these elementary illustrations can be enriched by using more general boundary conditions, which are still compatible with self-adjointness. In particular, we show that a puzzling problem associated with the Hydrogen atom in one dimension can be clarified by applying the correct requirements of self-adjointness. We then come to Stone\'s theorem, which is the main topic of this paper, and which is shown to relate the usual definitions of a self-adjoint operator to the possibility of constructing well-defined solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.
We are focused on the idea that observables in quantum physics are a bit more then just hermitian operators and that this is, in general, a “tricky business”. The origin of this idea comes from the fact that there is a subtle difference between symmetric, hermitian, and self-adjoint operators which are of immense importance in formulating Quantum Mechanics. The theory of self-adjoint extensions is presented through several physical examples and some emphasis is given on the physical implications and applications.
In the theory of quantum mechanics the Hamiltonian H is typically selfadjoint, i.e., H = H *. The self-adjointness ensures that the spectrum of the Hamiltonian, representing the energy spectrum of H , is real but it is not a necessary condition. In the literature on so-called PT -symmetric quantum mechanics (see, e.g., [BB98], [BBM99], [BBJ03], [Ben04b] and [Ben07]), it is believed that self-adjointness is rather a mathematical requirement than a physically established fact. Therefore, it was considered a surprise that operators exist which are not self-adjoint in the given quantum mechanical Hilbert space, but have real spectrum and that – if e.g. complex eigenvalues were present – they occurred only in complex conjugate pairs.