Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2103.01080 · Universe

Observables in Quantum Mechanics and the Importance of Self-Adjointness

Tajron Jurić

Published Feb 17, 2022• 15 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We are focused on the idea that observables in quantum physics are a bit more then just hermitian operators and that this is, in general, a “tricky business”. The origin of this idea comes from the fact that there is a subtle difference between symmetric, hermitian, and self-adjoint operators which are of immense importance in formulating Quantum Mechanics. The theory of self-adjoint extensions is presented through several physical examples and some emphasis is given on the physical implications and applications.

DOI
10.3390/universe8020129

Related papers

Operators

Belal Ehsan Baaquie

Operators represent physically observable quantities, as discussed in Section 2.5. The structure and property of operators depend on the nature of the degree of freedom; operators act on the state space and in particular on the state vector of a given degree of freedom. The significance of operators in the interpretation of quantum mechanics has been discussed in Baaquie (2013e). The operators discussed in this chapter are mostly based on the continuous degree of freedom, which is analyzed in Section 3.1. Hermitian operators represent physically observable properties of a degree of freedom and their mathematical properties are defined in Section 3.3. The coordinate and momentum operators are the leading exemplar of a pair of noncommuting Hermitian operators and these are studied in some detail in Section 3.4. The Weyl operators yield, as in Section 3.5, a finite-dimensional example of the shift and scaling operators; Section 3.8 provides a unitary representation of the coordinate and momentum operators. The term self-adjoint operator is used for Hermitian operators when there is a need to emphasize the importance of the domain of the Hilbert space on which the operators act – a topic not usually discussed in most books on quantum mechanics. Sections 3.10 and 3.11 discuss the concept of self-adjoint operators, in particular the crucial role played by the domain for realizing the property of self-adjointness. It is shown in Section 3.12 how the requirement of self-adjointness yields a non-trivial extension of Hamiltonians that include singular interactions.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 27, 2014•0 citations

Self-adjoint extensions of operators and the teaching of quantum mechanics

Guy Bonneau, Jacques Faraut, Galliano Valent A

For the example of the infinite well potential, we point out some paradoxes which are solved by a careful analysis of what is a truly self-adjoint operator. We then describe the self-adjoint extensions and their spectra for the momentum and the Hamiltonian operators in different settings. Additional physical requirements such as parity, time reversal, and positivity are used to restrict the large class of self-adjoint extensions of the Hamiltonian.

arXiv:quant-ph/0103153•American Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 2001•313 citations

On representing observables in quantum mechanics

D A Dubin, M A Hennings, P Lahti +1 more

There are self-adjoint operators which determine both spectral and semispectral measures. These measures have very different commutativity and covariance properties. This fact opens additional possibilities with regard to the physical meaning of such a self-adjoint operator and its associated operator measures.

arXiv:quant-ph/0206168•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Oct 15, 2002•5 citations

Self-adjoint Extensions in Quantum Mechanics

Dmitri M Gitman, Igor Viktorovich Tyutin, Boris Leonidovich Voronov

Quantization of physical systems requires a correct definition of quantum-mechanical observables, such as the Hamiltonian, momentum, etc., as self-adjoint operators in appropriate Hilbert spaces and t

Birkhäuser Boston eBooks•Jan 1, 2012•158 citations

Measurement and self-adjoint operators

G.E. Johnson

The approximations of classical mechanics resulting from quantum mechanics are richer than a correspondence of classical dynamical variables with self-adjoint Hilbert space operators. Assertion that classical dynamic variables correspond to self-adjoint Hilbert space operators is disputable and sets unnatural limits on quantum mechanics. Well known examples of classical dynamical variables not associated with self-adjoint Hilbert space operators are discussed as a motivation for the realizations of quantum field theory that lack Hermitian field operators but exhibit interaction.

arXiv:1405.7224•May 28, 2014•3 citations

ON NON-SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS FOR OBSERVABLES IN QUANTUM MECHANICS AND QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

Erasmo Recami, V. S. Olkhovsky, Sergei P. Maydanyuk

The aim of this paper is to show the possible significance, and usefulness, of various non-self-adjoint operators for suitable Observables in nonrelativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics, and in quantum electrodynamics. More specifically, this work deals with: (i) the maximal Hermitian (but not self-adjoint) time operator in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and in quantum electrodynamics; (ii) the problem of the four-position and four-momentum operators, each one with its Hermitian and anti-Hermitian parts, for relativistic spin-zero particles. Afterwards, other physically important applications of non-self-adjoint (and even non-Hermitian) operators are discussed: in particular, (iii) we reanalyze in detail the interesting possibility of associating quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonians with (decaying) unstable states in nuclear physics. Finally, we briefly mention the cases of quantum dissipation, as well as of the nuclear optical potential.

arXiv:0903.3187•International Journal of Modern Physics A•Apr 10, 2010•14 citations
We are focused on the idea that observables in quantum physics are a bit more then just hermitian operators and that this is, in general, a “tricky business”. The origin of this idea comes from the fact that there is a subtle difference between symmetric, hermitian, and self-adjoint operators which are of immense importance in formulating Quantum Mechanics. The theory of self-adjoint extensions is presented through several physical examples and some emphasis is given on the physical implications and applications.
Operators represent physically observable quantities, as discussed in Section 2.5. The structure and property of operators depend on the nature of the degree of freedom; operators act on the state space and in particular on the state vector of a given degree of freedom. The significance of operators in the interpretation of quantum mechanics has been discussed in Baaquie (2013e). The operators discussed in this chapter are mostly based on the continuous degree of freedom, which is analyzed in Section 3.1. Hermitian operators represent physically observable properties of a degree of freedom and their mathematical properties are defined in Section 3.3. The coordinate and momentum operators are the leading exemplar of a pair of noncommuting Hermitian operators and these are studied in some detail in Section 3.4. The Weyl operators yield, as in Section 3.5, a finite-dimensional example of the shift and scaling operators; Section 3.8 provides a unitary representation of the coordinate and momentum operators. The term self-adjoint operator is used for Hermitian operators when there is a need to emphasize the importance of the domain of the Hilbert space on which the operators act – a topic not usually discussed in most books on quantum mechanics. Sections 3.10 and 3.11 discuss the concept of self-adjoint operators, in particular the crucial role played by the domain for realizing the property of self-adjointness. It is shown in Section 3.12 how the requirement of self-adjointness yields a non-trivial extension of Hamiltonians that include singular interactions.
The approximations of classical mechanics resulting from quantum mechanics are richer than a correspondence of classical dynamical variables with self-adjoint Hilbert space operators. Assertion that classical dynamic variables correspond to self-adjoint Hilbert space operators is disputable and sets unnatural limits on quantum mechanics. Well known examples of classical dynamical variables not associated with self-adjoint Hilbert space operators are discussed as a motivation for the realizations of quantum field theory that lack Hermitian field operators but exhibit interaction.
The aim of this paper is to show the possible significance, and usefulness, of various non-self-adjoint operators for suitable Observables in nonrelativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics, and in quantum electrodynamics. More specifically, this work deals with: (i) the maximal Hermitian (but not self-adjoint) time operator in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and in quantum electrodynamics; (ii) the problem of the four-position and four-momentum operators, each one with its Hermitian and anti-Hermitian parts, for relativistic spin-zero particles. Afterwards, other physically important applications of non-self-adjoint (and even non-Hermitian) operators are discussed: in particular, (iii) we reanalyze in detail the interesting possibility of associating quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonians with (decaying) unstable states in nuclear physics. Finally, we briefly mention the cases of quantum dissipation, as well as of the nuclear optical potential.