Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Comment on ‘‘Odd-parity singlet pairing in the positive-U Hubbard model’’

Elbio R. Dagotto, A. P. Kampf, J. R. Schrieffer

Published Nov 1, 1991• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A Comment on the Letter by R. Scalettar, R. R. P. Singh, and S. C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 370 (1991).Received 28 June 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2918©1991 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.67.2918

Related papers

Scalettar, Singh, and Zhang reply

Richard T. Scalettar, Rajiv R. P. Singh, S. Zhang

An odd-parity singlet pairing state is proposed in the doped paramagnetic 2D Hubbard mode. (AIP)Received 23 August 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2919©1991 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Nov 1, 1991•0 citations

Comment on ‘‘Pseudospin symmetry and new collective modes of the Hubbard model’’

I. A. Fomin, Peter Schmitteckert, P. Wölfle

A Comment on the Letter by Shoucheng Zhang Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 120 (1990).Received 7 November 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.214©1992 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jul 6, 1992•7 citations

Ground state of the attractive-UHubbard model

Jorge O. Sofo, C. A. Balseiro

A Comment on the Letter by R. R. P. Singh and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3203 (1991).Received 17 July 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.896©1992 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 10, 1992•4 citations

Comment on ‘‘New 1/Nexpansion method for the generalized Hubbard model’’

P. G. J. van Dongen

A Comment on the Letter by G. Czrcholl and Q. Qin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3244 (1992).Received 10 August 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2878©1992 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Nov 9, 1992•2 citations

Comment on ‘‘Interacting-electron model exactly solvable in any dimension’’

V. Janiš, Florian Gebhard, Rainer Strack +1 more

A Comment on the Letter by A. Montorsi and M. Rasetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1383 (1991).Received 10 July 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2443©1992 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Oct 19, 1992•3 citations

Comment on ‘‘Slave-boson mean field versus quantum Monte Carlo results for the Hubbard model’’

B. Mehlig

A Comment on the Letter by Lilly, Muramatsu, and, Hanke Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1379 (1990).Received 9 July 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2048©1993 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Mar 29, 1993•7 citations
A Comment on the Letter by R. Scalettar, R. R. P. Singh, and S. C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 370 (1991).Received 28 June 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2918©1991 American Physical Society