Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Comment on ‘‘Interacting-electron model exactly solvable in any dimension’’

V. Janiš, Florian Gebhard, Rainer Strack, D. Vollhardt

Published Oct 19, 1992• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A Comment on the Letter by A. Montorsi and M. Rasetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1383 (1991).Received 10 July 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2443©1992 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.69.2443

Related papers

Comment on “A New Class of Exactly Solvable Interacting Fermion Models in One Dimension”

Andrei A. Zvyagin

A Comment on the Letter by H. J. Schulz and B. Sriram Shastry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1924 (1998). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 10 March 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2409©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Mar 15, 1999•6 citations

Comment on “Electronic Model for Superconductivity”

Antimo Angelucci, Sandro Sorella

A Comment on the Letter by Fabian H. L. Essler, Vladimir E. Korepin, and Kareljan Schoutens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 73 (1993). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 27 July 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4289©1996 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 27, 1996•2 citations

Comment on “Potts Model with Long-Range Interactions in One Dimension”

Katarina Uzelac, Zvonko Glumac

A Comment on the Letter by E. Bayong, H. T. Diep, and Viktor Dotsenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 14 (1999). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 14 September 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5255©2000 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Dec 11, 2000•10 citations

Comment on ‘‘Electronic model for superconductivity’’

Claudio Castellani, C. Di Castro, M. Grilli

A Comment on the Letter by F. H. L. Essler et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 73 (1993).Received 17 January 1994DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3626©1994 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 30, 1994•5 citations

Comment on ‘‘Odd-parity singlet pairing in the positive-U Hubbard model’’

Elbio R. Dagotto, A. P. Kampf, J. R. Schrieffer

A Comment on the Letter by R. Scalettar, R. R. P. Singh, and S. C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 370 (1991).Received 28 June 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2918©1991 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Nov 1, 1991•5 citations

Comment on ‘‘Slave-boson mean field versus quantum Monte Carlo results for the Hubbard model’’

B. Mehlig

A Comment on the Letter by Lilly, Muramatsu, and, Hanke Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1379 (1990).Received 9 July 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2048©1993 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Mar 29, 1993•7 citations
A Comment on the Letter by A. Montorsi and M. Rasetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1383 (1991).Received 10 July 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2443©1992 American Physical Society