Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Comment on ‘‘Slave-boson mean field versus quantum Monte Carlo results for the Hubbard model’’

B. Mehlig

Published Mar 29, 1993• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A Comment on the Letter by Lilly, Muramatsu, and, Hanke Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1379 (1990).Received 9 July 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2048©1993 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.70.2048

Related papers

Comment on “Gaussian Quantum Monte Carlo Methods for Fermions and Bosons”

S. Rombouts

A Comment on the Letter by J. F. Corney and P. D. Drummond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 260401 (2004). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 11 November 2005DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.188901©2006 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 8, 2006•3 citations

Comment on ‘‘New 1/Nexpansion method for the generalized Hubbard model’’

P. G. J. van Dongen

A Comment on the Letter by G. Czrcholl and Q. Qin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3244 (1992).Received 10 August 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2878©1992 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Nov 9, 1992•2 citations

Comment on ‘‘Scalar Aharonov-Bohm experiment with neutrons’’

Murray Peshkin

A Comment on the Letter by B. E. Allman et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2409 (1992).Received 26 May 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2017©1992 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Sep 28, 1992•18 citations

Comment on ‘‘Histogram Monte Carlo renormalization group method for phase transition models without critical slowing down’’

Jouke R. Heringa, Henk W. J. Blöte

A Comment on the Letter by C.-K. Hu Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2739 (1992).Received 1 December 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2044©1993 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Mar 29, 1993•5 citations

Comment on “Quantum Monte Carlo Approach to Elementary Excitations of Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Chains”

Ulrich Schollwöck, Th. Jolicœur

A Comment on the Letter by S. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3348 (1995). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 24 June 1996DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2844©1996 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Sep 23, 1996•11 citations

Comment on ‘‘Interacting-electron model exactly solvable in any dimension’’

V. Janiš, Florian Gebhard, Rainer Strack +1 more

A Comment on the Letter by A. Montorsi and M. Rasetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1383 (1991).Received 10 July 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2443©1992 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Oct 19, 1992•3 citations
A Comment on the Letter by Lilly, Muramatsu, and, Hanke Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1379 (1990).Received 9 July 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2048©1993 American Physical Society