Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Comment on ‘‘Pseudospin symmetry and new collective modes of the Hubbard model’’

I. A. Fomin, Peter Schmitteckert, P. Wölfle

Published Jul 6, 1992• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A Comment on the Letter by Shoucheng Zhang Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 120 (1990).Received 7 November 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.214©1992 American Physical Society
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.69.214

Related papers

Comment on ‘‘Odd-parity singlet pairing in the positive-U Hubbard model’’

Elbio R. Dagotto, A. P. Kampf, J. R. Schrieffer

A Comment on the Letter by R. Scalettar, R. R. P. Singh, and S. C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 370 (1991).Received 28 June 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2918©1991 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Nov 1, 1991•5 citations

Comment on ‘‘New model of fractional spin’’

Yakir Aharonov, C. K. Au, Lev Vaidman A

A Comment on the Letter by J. Q. Liang and X. X. Ding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 831 (1989).Received 5 February 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1638©1991 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Mar 25, 1991•0 citations

Comment on ‘‘New 1/Nexpansion method for the generalized Hubbard model’’

P. G. J. van Dongen

A Comment on the Letter by G. Czrcholl and Q. Qin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3244 (1992).Received 10 August 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2878©1992 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Nov 9, 1992•2 citations

Comment on ‘‘Nature of exotic negative carriers in superfluid ’4

C. D. H. Williams, P. C. Hendry, P. V. E. McClintock

A Comment on the Letter by T. M. Sanders, Jr. and G. G. Ihas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1722 (1987).Received 30 November 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.865©1988 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 29, 1988•42 citations

Comment on nonstatistical excited-state populations

R. P. Schmitt

A Comment on the Letter by T. K. Nayak et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1021 (1989).Received 10 November 1989DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.2080©1990 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Oct 15, 1990•3 citations

Comment on ‘‘Slave-boson mean field versus quantum Monte Carlo results for the Hubbard model’’

B. Mehlig

A Comment on the Letter by Lilly, Muramatsu, and, Hanke Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1379 (1990).Received 9 July 1992DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2048©1993 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Mar 29, 1993•7 citations