Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optics Letters

Quantum imaging and inverse scattering

John C. Schotland

Published Oct 7, 2010• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We consider the inverse scattering problem that arises in two-photon quantum imaging with interferometric measurements. We show that the two-point correlation function of the field contains information about the scattering medium at a spatial frequency of twice the Rayleigh bandwidth. The linearized inverse problem, however, yields reconstructions with a resolution of λ/2, where λ is the wavelength of light.

DOI
10.1364/ol.35.003309

Related papers

Advantages of one- and two-photon light in inverse scattering

Hakob Avetisyan, Vanik E. Mkrtchian, ARMEN E. ALLAHVERDYAN

We study an inverse scattering problem in which the far-field spectral cross correlation functions of scattered fields are used to determine the unknown dielectric susceptibility of the scattering object. One-photon states for the incident field can resolve (at 100% visibility) twice as many Fourier components of the susceptibility compared with the (naïve) Rayleigh estimate, provided that the measurement is performed in the back-scattering regime. Coherent states are not capable of reaching this optimal resolution (or do so with negligible visibility). Using two-photon states improves upon the one-photon resolution, but the improvement (at 100% visibility) is smaller than twice, and it demands prior information on the object. This improvement can also be realized via two independent laser fields. The dependence on the prior information can be decreased (but not eliminated completely) upon using entangled states of two photons.

arXiv:2304.00368•Optics Letters•Jun 20, 2023•1 citation

Quantum field theory and inverse problems: Imaging with Entangled Photons

Matti J. Lassas, Medet Nursultanov, Lauri Oksanen +1 more

We consider the quantum field theory for a scalar model of the electromagnetic field interacting with a system of two-level atoms. In this setting, we show that it is possible to uniquely determine the density of atoms from measurements of the source to solution map for a system of nonlocal partial differential equations, which describe the scattering of a two-photon state from the atoms. The required measurements involve correlating the outputs of a point detector with an integrating detector, thereby exploiting information about the entanglement of the photons.

arXiv:2506.03653•Jun 4, 2025•0 citations

Information Analysis for Quantum Imaging Optimization

Alexander B. Mikhalychev, Ilya Karuseichyk, Svetlana V. Vlasenko +5 more

Quantum imaging emerged quite recently as a breakthrough technology of overcoming the diffraction limit in microscopy and enhancement of optical resolution without the necessity to use hard radiation or perform scanning in the near field [1] , [2] . Both, the quantum imaging itself and the more “classical” techniques inspired by it (for example, super-resolution optical fluctuations imaging – SOFI [3] ), rely on detection and analysis of photon (intensity) correlations. Typically, it is believed that the more correlated illuminating light is used and the higher order of the correlations is measured, the larger super-resolution can be achieved. That conclusion is based on efficient narrowing of the point-spread function, which, however, does not necessarily imply better resolution as the ability to reconstruct smaller features of the investigated object successfully.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC)•Jun 21, 2021•0 citations

Noise in Classical and Quantum Photon-Correlation Imaging

Bahaa E. A. Saleh, Malvin Carl Teich

Imaging is the estimation of the spatial distribution of a physical object by measuring the optical radiation it emits, or by making use of an optical wave that interacts with the object, via reflection or transmission, for example, before being measured by a detector. The resolution of an imaging system is limited by the inability to localize the optical field at points of the object. Under otherwise ideal conditions, resolution is limited by diffraction. The sensitivity of an imaging system is limited by the uncertainty in the measurement. Under ideal conditions, this is determined by photon noise, which depends on the statistical fluctuations of the light. In conventional imaging systems, an extended detector, such as a CCD camera or an array detector, measures the spatial distribution of the optical intensity, which is proportional to the photon flux density. In interferometric systems, the spatial distribution of the optical field is inferred from measurements of the optical intensity. With the emergence of coherence theory, imaging systems based on measurements of the second-order coherence function at pairs of points in the detection plane were developed. An example is the imaging of an incoherent object based on the van Cittert-Zernike theorem. Imaging systems based on measurement of intensity correlation, or the photon coincidence rate, at pairs of points, were developed in the 1960s. A classic example of the photon-correlation imaging of an object emitting thermal light is stellar imaging using a Hanbury-Brown-Twiss intensity-correlation interferometer. More recently, two-photon light, which may be generated via spontaneous parametric downconversion in a second-order nonlinear optical crystal, has been used for imaging. This type of two-photon (or biphoton) imaging, which has come to be called quantum imaging, is also based on the measurement of photon coincidence by the use of photon-counting array detectors or by scanning two photon-counting detectors at pairs of points. To compare the resolution and sensitivity of imaging systems based on the aforementioned types of measurements, it is necessary to derive expressions for the measured quantities in terms of the object distribution. The point-spread functions based on such expressions can be used to assess the resolution. One measure of the sensitivity of the imaging process is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the measured variables. The statistical nature of the light source must be known in order to determine the SNR. The purpose of this chapter is to compare the resolution and sensitivity of photon-correlation imaging systems that make use of thermal light and two-photon light. We will henceforth refer to these two imaging modalities as classical and quantum photon-correlation imaging, or simply classical and quantum imaging, respectively. Clearly, light in other quantum states can also be used for imaging.

SPIE eBooks•Mar 16, 2010•3 citations

Quantum microscopy using photon correlations

Ashok Muthukrishnan, Marlan O. Scully, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

Higher-order correlations of the radiation field improve resolution in stellar interferometers, as in the Hanbury-Brown–Twiss effect. It is also possible to improve microscopic resolution beyond the Rayleigh limit by using quantum light fields composed of entangled photons. Focusing on two photons, we distinguish two types of entanglement: frequency entanglement, where the photons in different paths are correlated in frequency, and path entanglement, where the correlation between paths is in photon number. Two paradigms of quantum microscopy are discussed: spectral microscopy, where path- and frequency-entangled photons produced in cascade decay of two atoms make possible sub-natural linewidth resolution of atomic levels, and spatial microscopy, where path-entangled photons emitted by an atomic array produce sub-wavelength diffraction resolution as compared to an equivalent classical grating. These scenarios require two-photon correlation or coincidence measurements. The connection between the two paradigms, and the two types of entanglement, highlights the link between the temporal and spatial aspects of quantum interferometry.

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•May 29, 2004•41 citations

Imaging Spatial Quantum Correlations through a thin Scattering Medium

Gnatiessoro Soro, A. Mosset, Éric Lantz +1 more

We image with cameras entangled photon light transmitted through a thin scattering medium. Near-field and far-field spatial quantum correlations show that entangled photon pairs (bi-photons) generated by spontaneous optical parametric down-conversion exhibit speckle patterns. In contrast, no information from the thin scattering medium can be extracted using incoherent light issued from one photon of the pair.

OSA Continuum•Nov 21, 2019•12 citations
We consider the inverse scattering problem that arises in two-photon quantum imaging with interferometric measurements. We show that the two-point correlation function of the field contains information about the scattering medium at a spatial frequency of twice the Rayleigh bandwidth. The linearized inverse problem, however, yields reconstructions with a resolution of λ/2, where λ is the wavelength of light.
We study an inverse scattering problem in which the far-field spectral cross correlation functions of scattered fields are used to determine the unknown dielectric susceptibility of the scattering object. One-photon states for the incident field can resolve (at 100% visibility) twice as many Fourier components of the susceptibility compared with the (naïve) Rayleigh estimate, provided that the measurement is performed in the back-scattering regime. Coherent states are not capable of reaching this optimal resolution (or do so with negligible visibility). Using two-photon states improves upon the one-photon resolution, but the improvement (at 100% visibility) is smaller than twice, and it demands prior information on the object. This improvement can also be realized via two independent laser fields. The dependence on the prior information can be decreased (but not eliminated completely) upon using entangled states of two photons.
We consider the quantum field theory for a scalar model of the electromagnetic field interacting with a system of two-level atoms. In this setting, we show that it is possible to uniquely determine the density of atoms from measurements of the source to solution map for a system of nonlocal partial differential equations, which describe the scattering of a two-photon state from the atoms. The required measurements involve correlating the outputs of a point detector with an integrating detector, thereby exploiting information about the entanglement of the photons.
Quantum imaging emerged quite recently as a breakthrough technology of overcoming the diffraction limit in microscopy and enhancement of optical resolution without the necessity to use hard radiation or perform scanning in the near field [1] , [2] . Both, the quantum imaging itself and the more “classical” techniques inspired by it (for example, super-resolution optical fluctuations imaging – SOFI [3] ), rely on detection and analysis of photon (intensity) correlations. Typically, it is believed that the more correlated illuminating light is used and the higher order of the correlations is measured, the larger super-resolution can be achieved. That conclusion is based on efficient narrowing of the point-spread function, which, however, does not necessarily imply better resolution as the ability to reconstruct smaller features of the investigated object successfully.
Imaging is the estimation of the spatial distribution of a physical object by measuring the optical radiation it emits, or by making use of an optical wave that interacts with the object, via reflection or transmission, for example, before being measured by a detector. The resolution of an imaging system is limited by the inability to localize the optical field at points of the object. Under otherwise ideal conditions, resolution is limited by diffraction. The sensitivity of an imaging system is limited by the uncertainty in the measurement. Under ideal conditions, this is determined by photon noise, which depends on the statistical fluctuations of the light. In conventional imaging systems, an extended detector, such as a CCD camera or an array detector, measures the spatial distribution of the optical intensity, which is proportional to the photon flux density. In interferometric systems, the spatial distribution of the optical field is inferred from measurements of the optical intensity. With the emergence of coherence theory, imaging systems based on measurements of the second-order coherence function at pairs of points in the detection plane were developed. An example is the imaging of an incoherent object based on the van Cittert-Zernike theorem. Imaging systems based on measurement of intensity correlation, or the photon coincidence rate, at pairs of points, were developed in the 1960s. A classic example of the photon-correlation imaging of an object emitting thermal light is stellar imaging using a Hanbury-Brown-Twiss intensity-correlation interferometer. More recently, two-photon light, which may be generated via spontaneous parametric downconversion in a second-order nonlinear optical crystal, has been used for imaging. This type of two-photon (or biphoton) imaging, which has come to be called quantum imaging, is also based on the measurement of photon coincidence by the use of photon-counting array detectors or by scanning two photon-counting detectors at pairs of points. To compare the resolution and sensitivity of imaging systems based on the aforementioned types of measurements, it is necessary to derive expressions for the measured quantities in terms of the object distribution. The point-spread functions based on such expressions can be used to assess the resolution. One measure of the sensitivity of the imaging process is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the measured variables. The statistical nature of the light source must be known in order to determine the SNR. The purpose of this chapter is to compare the resolution and sensitivity of photon-correlation imaging systems that make use of thermal light and two-photon light. We will henceforth refer to these two imaging modalities as classical and quantum photon-correlation imaging, or simply classical and quantum imaging, respectively. Clearly, light in other quantum states can also be used for imaging.
Higher-order correlations of the radiation field improve resolution in stellar interferometers, as in the Hanbury-Brown–Twiss effect. It is also possible to improve microscopic resolution beyond the Rayleigh limit by using quantum light fields composed of entangled photons. Focusing on two photons, we distinguish two types of entanglement: frequency entanglement, where the photons in different paths are correlated in frequency, and path entanglement, where the correlation between paths is in photon number. Two paradigms of quantum microscopy are discussed: spectral microscopy, where path- and frequency-entangled photons produced in cascade decay of two atoms make possible sub-natural linewidth resolution of atomic levels, and spatial microscopy, where path-entangled photons emitted by an atomic array produce sub-wavelength diffraction resolution as compared to an equivalent classical grating. These scenarios require two-photon correlation or coincidence measurements. The connection between the two paradigms, and the two types of entanglement, highlights the link between the temporal and spatial aspects of quantum interferometry.