SPIE eBooks

Noise in Classical and Quantum Photon-Correlation Imaging

Bahaa E. A. Saleh, Malvin Carl Teich

Published Mar 16, 2010• 3 citations

Abstract

Imaging is the estimation of the spatial distribution of a physical object by measuring the optical radiation it emits, or by making use of an optical wave that interacts with the object, via reflection or transmission, for example, before being measured by a detector. The resolution of an imaging system is limited by the inability to localize the optical field at points of the object. Under otherwise ideal conditions, resolution is limited by diffraction. The sensitivity of an imaging system is limited by the uncertainty in the measurement. Under ideal conditions, this is determined by photon noise, which depends on the statistical fluctuations of the light. In conventional imaging systems, an extended detector, such as a CCD camera or an array detector, measures the spatial distribution of the optical intensity, which is proportional to the photon flux density. In interferometric systems, the spatial distribution of the optical field is inferred from measurements of the optical intensity. With the emergence of coherence theory, imaging systems based on measurements of the second-order coherence function at pairs of points in the detection plane were developed. An example is the imaging of an incoherent object based on the van Cittert-Zernike theorem. Imaging systems based on measurement of intensity correlation, or the photon coincidence rate, at pairs of points, were developed in the 1960s. A classic example of the photon-correlation imaging of an object emitting thermal light is stellar imaging using a Hanbury-Brown-Twiss intensity-correlation interferometer. More recently, two-photon light, which may be generated via spontaneous parametric downconversion in a second-order nonlinear optical crystal, has been used for imaging. This type of two-photon (or biphoton) imaging, which has come to be called quantum imaging, is also based on the measurement of photon coincidence by the use of photon-counting array detectors or by scanning two photon-counting detectors at pairs of points. To compare the resolution and sensitivity of imaging systems based on the aforementioned types of measurements, it is necessary to derive expressions for the measured quantities in terms of the object distribution. The point-spread functions based on such expressions can be used to assess the resolution. One measure of the sensitivity of the imaging process is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the measured variables. The statistical nature of the light source must be known in order to determine the SNR. The purpose of this chapter is to compare the resolution and sensitivity of photon-correlation imaging systems that make use of thermal light and two-photon light. We will henceforth refer to these two imaging modalities as classical and quantum photon-correlation imaging, or simply classical and quantum imaging, respectively. Clearly, light in other quantum states can also be used for imaging.

DOI: 10.1117/3.793309.ch21

Related papers

An Introduction to Quantum Optics: Photon and Biphoton Physics

Yanhua H. Shih

Electromagnetic Wave Theory and Measurement of Light Electromagnetic Wave Theory of Light Classical Superposition Measurement of Light Intensity of Light: Expectation and Fluctuation Measurement of Intensity: Ensemble Average and Time Average Coherence Property of Light-The State of the Radiation Coherence Property of Light Temporal Coherence Spatial Coherence Diffraction and Propagation Diffraction Field Propagation Optical Imaging A Classic Imaging System Fourier Transform via a Lens First-Order Coherence of Light First-Order Temporal Coherence First-Order Spatial Coherence Second-Order Coherence of Light Second-Order Coherence of Coherent Light Second-Order Correlation of Chaotic-Thermal Radiation and the HBT Interferometer The Physical Cause of the HBT Phenomenon Near-Field Second-Order Spatial Coherence of Thermal Light Nth-Order Coherence of Light Nth-Order Near-Field Spatial Coherence of Thermal Light Homodyne Detection and Heterodyne Detection of Light Optical Homodyne and Heterodyne Detection Balanced Homodyne and Heterodyne Detection Balanced Homodyne Detection of Independent and Coupled Thermal Fields Quantum Theory of Light: Field Quantization and Measurement The Experimental Foundation-Part I: Blackbody Radiation The Experimental Foundation-Part II: Photoelectric Effect The Light Quantum and the Field Quantization Photon Number State of Radiation Field Coherent State of Radiation Field Density Operator and Density Matrix Composite System and Two-Photon State of Radiation Field A Simple Model of Incoherent and Coherent Radiation Source Pure State and Mixed State Product State, Entangled State, and Mixed State of Photon Pairs Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory Measurement of Light: Photon Counting Measurement of Light: Joint Detection of Photons Field Propagation in Space-Time Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence Quantum Degree of First-Order Coherence Photon and Effective Wavefunction Measurement of the First-Order Coherence or Correlation Quantum Degree of Second-Order Coherence Two-Photon Interference vs. Statistical Correlation of Intensity Fluctuations Second-Order Spatial Correlation of Thermal Light Photon Counting and Measurement of G(2) Quantum Entanglement EPR Experiment and EPR State Product State, Entangled State, and Classically Correlated State Entangled States in Spin Variables Entangled Biphoton State EPR Correlation of Entangled Biphoton System Subsystem in an Entangled Two-Photon State Biphoton in Dispersive Media Quantum Imaging Biphoton Imaging Ghost Imaging Ghost Imaging and Uncertainty Relation Thermal Light Ghost Imaging Classical Simulation of Ghost Imaging Turbulence-Free Ghost Imaging Two-Photon Interferometry I: Biphoton Interference Is Two-Photon Interference the Interference of Two Photons? Two-Photon Interference with Orthogonal Polarization Franson Interferometer Two-Photon Ghost Interference Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Two-Photon Interferometry II: Quantum Interference of Chaotic Light Two-Photon Young's Interference Two-Photon Anticorrelation with Incoherent Chaotic Light Two-Photon Interference with Incoherent Orthogonal Polarized Chaotic Light Bell's Theorem and Bell's Inequality Measurement Hidden Variable Theory and Quantum Calculation for the Measurement of Spin 1/2 Bohm State Bell's Theorem and Bell's Inequality Bell States Bell State Preparation

Jan 24, 201140 citations

Information Analysis for Quantum Imaging Optimization

Alexander B. Mikhalychev, Ilya Karuseichyk, Svetlana V. Vlasenko +5 more

Quantum imaging emerged quite recently as a breakthrough technology of overcoming the diffraction limit in microscopy and enhancement of optical resolution without the necessity to use hard radiation or perform scanning in the near field [1] , [2] . Both, the quantum imaging itself and the more “classical” techniques inspired by it (for example, super-resolution optical fluctuations imaging – SOFI [3] ), rely on detection and analysis of photon (intensity) correlations. Typically, it is believed that the more correlated illuminating light is used and the higher order of the correlations is measured, the larger super-resolution can be achieved. That conclusion is based on efficient narrowing of the point-spread function, which, however, does not necessarily imply better resolution as the ability to reconstruct smaller features of the investigated object successfully.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC)Jun 21, 20210 citations

Comparing quantum imaging with classical second-order incoherent imaging

Ivan F. Santos, J. G. Aguirre Gómez, Sebastião Pádua

Relating to magnified image formation systems, we consider two processes in this work: quantum and classical incoherent imaging. There are similarities and differences between them. A similarity is that the optical transfer functions (OTFs) of both systems are obtained by calculating a correlation function. Concerning the differences, only two were found. The first difference is that, unlike classical incoherent imaging, quantum imaging with photon pairs generated by spontaneous parametric down-conversion is sensitive to the phase in the function which describes the object. The second difference is that the OTF of the quantum imaging system is a cross-correlation function of the OTFs of the signal and idler arms, while the OTF of the classical incoherent imaging system is an autocorrelation of the only pupil function existing in this case. We explore experimentally the second difference. We report the observation of a highly resolved image produced by a quantum light source in a setup where an incoherent light source is unable to spatially resolve the image of the object. The spatial resolution of the image is studied in a situation where the size of the object is magnified at the image.

Physical Review AApr 28, 200816 citations

Quantum ghost imaging

Morris, Peter A.

The process of image recording is arguably one of the most prevalent technology in modern society and continues to inspire vast swathes of research due to its widespread applications spanning military, medical and consumer spheres. The danger present in a field so broad is that separate niches of research can become isolated with critical advancements struggling to traverse the gulfs between. Unifying the field is the omnipresent drive to acquire an ever increasing quality of images at the lowest possible cost, a goal which warrants continual fundamental research. Quantum entanglement exhibits many intriguing characteristics which make it a suitable tool for such fundamental investigations. The process of spontaneous parametric down- conversion has offered a yet unbeaten strength of photon correlations with the quantum nature of their production providing a reliable and controllable source of single-photons. Arising from these attributes is the technique known as ghost imaging. Though now known to be classically possible, the strength of entanglement generated correlations is yet to be surpassed. This thesis implemented this technique in tandem with the cutting edge detector technology in order to probe the fundamentals of image formation. This form of imaging allowed us to subject an object to a known number of photons whilst acquiring structural information from spatially separate, correlated photons which never interact with the object. The strength of the produced correlations allow us to acquire low background, high resolution images with far less light than traditional techniques and affords many novel benefits. The possibility of incorporating this technique with pre-existent regimes allowed me to draw from advancements made across the landscape of imaging research. Although referred to as “quantum ghost imaging” throughout this work, it should be noted that the intrinsic quantum nature of the correlations was not directly relied upon but provided an ideal source of strongly correlated photons. In order to determine the limits of a traditional imaging system this thesis first sought to answer the question: “can an image of an object be reconstructed from fewer photons than ii pixels in the image?” In chapter 3 I approached this from the perspective of compression, which minimises redundant information within a signal. This lead to the development of an imaging regime capable of imaging with far fewer photons than pixels in the image. By employing assumptions about the sparsity of natural images I was able to reconstruct an image of a biological sample containing an average of less than one photon per image pixel. Having reduced the number of photons necessary to form an image I then considered alternative methods for reducing the optical energy impinging on a sample. I sought to answer the question: “can non-degenerate ghost imaging reduce the optical energy impinged upon an object during imaging”. The photons produced in SPDC need not be of similar wavelengths, however may be chosen far from degeneracy, i.e. non-degenerate. In Chapter 4 I presented a ghost imaging system which illuminated the object with infrared light whilst recording the structural information via entangled visible photons. This allowed for objects opaque to visible light to be imaged in high quality without the need for a spatially resolving infrared detector, the state of the art of which lags behind their silicon based visible counterparts. I presented the systems capabilities by imaging objects which were etched into a gold substrate layered on to silicon, both of which are opaque to visible light. Not only did a reduction in energy deposition arise from the lower energy probe wavelength but applying the reconstruction techniques from the previous chapter brought that down to as low as ≈16 nJcm−2s−1. Seeking to expand the repertoire of applications, the low-light capabilities of my ghost imaging were applied to the technique of phase-contrast microscopy in chapter 5. Typically applied to translucent objects, phase-contrast imaging transfers phase information, i.e. the refractive index changed within the object, into an intensity distribution through the use of a phase-filter. In many of these applications the objects tend to be biological in nature, where high optical exposure can result in bleaching or damage. By applying the phase-filter non- locally, i.e. to the photons correlated to those probing the object, I acquired edge-enhanced images of a phase object whilst illuminating with significantly fewer photons than standard phase-contrast techniques. Having displayed the broad applicability of our low-light ghost imaging system, I then sought to determine the optical resolution in chapter 6. The resolution limits of ghost imaging are not clear at first glance owing to the resolutions dependence upon the strength of spatial correlations. As the length over which the spatial correlations are produced can be brought below the standard diffraction limit, it would seem the resolution of the system could be brought similarly low. To clarify this I artificially restricted the number of spatial modes in each of the correlated beams to uncover the physically realisable resolution. I show that although the resolution of a ghost imaging system to be fundamentally determined by the strength of the correlations, this can never be reached due to the inherent limitations of the intervening imaging system.

Jan 1, 20180 citations

Quantum imaging with a photon counting camera

Osian Wolley, Thomas Gregory, Sebastian M. J. Beer +2 more

Classical light sources emit a randomly-timed stream of individual photons, the spatial distribution of which can be detected with a camera to form an image. Quantum light sources, based on parametric down conversion, emit photons as correlated photon-pairs. The spatial correlations between the photons enables imaging systems where the preferential selection of photon-pairs allows for enhancements in the noise performance over what is possible using classical light sources. However, until now the technical challenge of measuring, and correlating both photons has led to system complexity. Here we show that a camera capable of resolving the number of individual photons in each pixel of the detector array can be used to record an image formed from these photon-pair events and hence achieve a greater contrast than possible using a classical light source. We achieve an enhancement in the ratio of two-photon events compared to one-photon events using spatially correlated SPDC light compared to uncorrelated illumination by a LED. These results indicate the potential advantages of using photon counting cameras in quantum imaging schemes and these advantages will further increase as the technology is developed. Operating in photon sparse regimes such systems have potential applications in low-light microscopy and covert imaging.

Scientific ReportsMay 18, 202247 citations

Quantum Phase Imaging using Spatial Entanglement

Chien-Hung Lu, Matthew C. Reichert, Sun, Xiaohang +1 more

Entangled photons have the remarkable ability to be more sensitive to signal and less sensitive to noise than classical light. Joint photons can sample an object collectively, resulting in faster phase accumulation and higher spatial resolution, while common components of noise can be subtracted. Even more, they can accomplish this while physically separate, due to the nonlocal properties of quantum mechanics. Indeed, nearly all quantum optics experiments rely on this separation, using individual point detectors that are scanned to measure coincidence counts and correlations. Scanning, however, is tedious, time consuming, and ill-suited for imaging. Moreover, the separation of beam paths adds complexity to the system while reducing the number of photons available for sampling, and the multiplicity of detectors does not scale well for greater numbers of photons and higher orders of entanglement. We bypass all of these problems here by directly imaging collinear photon pairs with an electron-multiplying CCD camera. We show explicitly the benefits of quantum nonlocality by engineering the spatial entanglement of the illuminating photons and introduce a new method of correlation measurement by converting time-domain coincidence counting into spatial-domain detection of selected pixels. We show that classical transport-of-intensity methods are applicable in the quantum domain and experimentally demonstrate nearly optimal (Heisenberg-limited) phase measurement for the given quantum illumination. The methods show the power of direct imaging and hold much potential for more general types of quantum information processing and control.

arXiv:1509.01227Sep 3, 20151 citation