Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review B

Configuration interaction approach for the computation of the electronic self-energy

Y. Pavlyukh, Wolfgang Hübner

Published May 30, 2007• 17 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In order to properly understand the utility of many-body perturbation theory as applied to finite systems, we use the configuration interaction approach to compute the electronic self-energy. The validity of the commonly used $GW$ approximation from many-body perturbation theory is tested by comparing the self-energy explicitly computed according to the diagrammatic expansions to that from the inversion of the Dyson equation. It is constructed as a functional of the interacting Green function $G$ and screened Coulomb interaction $W$. $W$ is explicitly computed through the diagonalization of the many-body Hamiltonian and, thus, takes polarization effects into account beyond the random phase approximation. The $\mathrm{Na}_{9}{}^{+}$ cluster and the dissociation of the ${\mathrm{C}}_{2}$ molecule are discussed as examples. We find that the $GW$ approximation yields accurate results for weakly correlated systems with a predominantly single-determinant ground state such as $\mathrm{Na}_{9}{}^{+}$ clusters. The ${\mathrm{C}}_{2}$ molecule is a pathological system with multideterminantal ground state where the $GW$ approach ceases to be valid.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.75.205129

Related papers

Many-body perturbation theory: The GW approximation

Christoph Friedrich, Arno Schindlmayr

In this lecture we present many-body perturbation theory as a method to determine quasiparticle excitations in solids, especially electronic band structures, accurately from first principles.The main ingredient is the electronic self-energy that, in principle, contains all many-body exchange and correlation effects beyond the Hartree potential.As its exact mathematical expression is unknown, approximations must be used in practical calculations.The approximation is obtained using a systematic algebraic approach on the basis of Green function techniques.It constitutes an expansion of the self-energy up to linear order in the screened Coulomb potential, which describes the interaction between the quasiparticles and includes dynamic screening through the creation of exchange-correlation holes around the bare particles.The implementation of the approximation relies on a perturbative treatment starting from density functional theory.Besides a detailed mathematical discussion we focus on the underlying physical concepts and show some illustrative applications.

•Jan 1, 2006•19 citations

The RPA and the GW approximation for the self-energy

Richard M. Martin, Lucia Reining, David M. Ceperley

Besides the proof of a modified Luttinger–Ward–Klein variational principle and a related self-consistency idea, there is not much new in principle in this paper. L. Hedin, Phys. Rev . 139, A796–823 (1965) Summary In this chapter a set of equations is formulated that determine the self-energy and the one-body Green's function in terms of the screened Coulomb interaction between classical charges. The equations contain a correction to the classical picture in terms of a vertex function. The physical meaning of the various contributions is discussed. The simplest approximation for the vertex yields the random phase approximation for the polarizability and the GW approximation for the self-energy. Various aspects of the GWA are analyzed, with a focus on the physics that is added beyond Hartree– Fock. A brief summary of model cases illustrates the domain of validity and the limits of the GWA. In this chapter we elaborate in more detail on the question of how to calculate the onebody Green's function from a Dyson equation with a self-energy kernel. In the previous chapter a scheme was introduced to design approximations to the self-energy. However, the question of where to stop, which pieces of physics to include and which to neglect, is not yet settled. Of course, there is no unique answer, besides the exact solution, but different strategies can be more or less advantageous in practice. In a system with a few electrons, for example, different aspects will be important than in a system with many electrons. Here we are mostly interested in solids, or more generally in extended systems. In such systems, screening plays an essential role: the interaction between two charges is strongly modified, in general reduced, by the rearrangement of all the other charges. It is therefore most convenient to reformulate the equations such that screening appears explicitly. Some steps in this direction can be found in earlier chapters, in particular in Sec. 8.3, the formulation of the Ψ [ G , W ]-functional of the screened interaction W instead of the Ф[ G , v c ]-functional of the bare v c . In Sec. 10.5 the screened interaction approximation for the self-energy is derived, with the self-energy as a product of the one-body Green's function and the screened interaction W .

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 31, 2016•0 citations

Self-consistent density-functional approach to the correlated ground states and an unrestricted many-body perturbation theory

Behnam Farid

We introduce a scheme through which the ground-state electronic density n and total energy Ev [n] of inhomogeneous interacting systems can be determined in a self-consistent (SC) way. It is based on a SC perturbation expansion for the single-particle Green function G. Our employed expansion is argued to be valid under all conditions provided that the ground-state charge density of the interacting system is pure-state non-interacting v representable. The formalism discussed in this paper has been applied to a quasi-one-dimensional periodic system. It has even been possible to carry out SC calculations with the dynamically screened exchange diagram (the so-called GW diagram, where W is the dynamically screened electron-electron interaction function) for the self-energy operator Σ. A coherent mode of interpretation of a number of our results entails that the overwhelming success of the GW framework in relatively accurately reproducing the experimental energy gaps of a number of semiconductors and insulators may be a direct consequence of non-self-consistency effects; whereas a non-self-consistent calculation in our tests increases the value of the local-density approximation (LDA) gap in the range of 40–65% of the ‘experimental’ gaps, self-consistency effects reduce this range to 14–17%. The same line of argument leads us to conclude that, in our model, 26–35% of the LDA error in the gap energies is due to the absence of a well known discontinuity in the LDA exchange-correlation potential, and the remaining part is due to the Kohn-Sham eigenvalues not being identifiable with one-particle excitation energies. A natural conclusion that may be drawn from these observations is that a correct description of excitation energies (e.g. of the gap energy) cannot be achieved without including, at least approximately, the vertex part of Σ, which is entirely absent in the GW scheme.

Philosophical Magazine B•Aug 1, 1997•18 citations

The GW approximation: content, successes and limitations

Lucia Reining

Many observables such as the density, total energy, or electric current, can be expressed explicitly in terms of the one‐body Green's function, which describes electron addition or removal to or from a system. An efficient way to determine such a Green's function is to introduce a self‐energy, which is a nonlocal and dynamic effective potential that influences the propagation of particles in an interacting system. The state‐of‐the art approximation for the self‐energy is the GW approximation, where the system to (or from) which the electron is added (or removed) is described as a polarizable, screening, medium. This is expressed by the name of the approximation: ‘GW’ stands for the one‐body Green's function G and for W , the dynamically screened Coulomb interaction. The GW approximation is very popular for the calculation of band structures in solids, and increasingly used also to describe nanostructures, clusters, and molecules. As compared to static mean‐field approximations for the effective potential, the dynamical screening of the Coulomb interaction in GW leads to a renormalization of energies, to broadening and/or to the observation of additional excitations. An analysis of the approximations that lead to the GW self‐energy, and of the underlying picture, explains the successes and the limitations of the approach. This article is categorized under: Electronic Structure Theory > Density Functional Theory Electronic Structure Theory > Ab Initio Electronic Structure Methods Theoretical and Physical Chemistry > Spectroscopy Structure and Mechanism > Computational Materials Science

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science•Dec 27, 2017•286 citations

Self-consistent density-functional approach to the correlated ground states and an unrestricted many-body perturbation theory

Behnam

We introduce a scheme through which the ground-state electronic density n and total energy Ey[n] of inhomogeneous interacting systems can be determined in a self-consistent (SC) way. It is based on a SC perturbation expansion for the single-particle Green function G. Our employed expansion is argued to be valid under all conditions provided that the ground-state charge density of the interacting system is pure-state non-interacting v representable. The formalism discussed in this paper has been applied to a quasi-one-dimensional periodic system. It has even been possible to carry out SC calculations with the dynamically screened exchange diagram (the so-called G W diagram, where W is the dynamically screened electron4ectron interaction function) for the selfenergy operator C. A coherent mode of interpretation of a number of our results entails that the overwhelming success of the G W framework in relatively accurately reproducing the experimental energy gaps of a number of semiconductors and insulators may be a direct consequence of non-selfconsistency effects; whereas a non-self-consistent calculation in our tests increases the value of the local-density approximation (LDA) gap in the range of 40-65% of the ‘experimental’ gaps, self-consistency effects reduce this range to 1 4 1 7 % . The same line of argument leads us to conclude that, in our model, 2635% of the LDA error in the gap energies is due to the absence of a well known discontinuity in the LDA exchange-correlation potential, and the remaining part is due to the Kohn-Sham eigenvalues not being identifiable with one-particle excitation energies. A natural conclusion that may be drawn from these observations is that a correct description of excitation energies (e.g. of the gap energy) cannot be achieved without including, at least approximately, the vertex part of C, which is entirely absent in the GW scheme. 5 1 . INTRODUCTION The ground-state (GS) density-functional theory (DFT) due to Hohenberg and Kohn (1964) provides a rigorous foundation for determining properties of systems in their ground states (for reviews see Lundqvist and March (1983), Jones and Gunnarsson (1989) and Dreizler and Gross (1990)). The central position in this theory is taken by the total-energy functional EY[n] which, owing to its unique absolute minimum a t the GS electronic density n, can be used to obtain not only the GS energy but also the GS charge density. tPresent address: Max-Planck-Institut fur Festkorperforschung, HeisenbergstraRe 1, 70569 Stuttgart, Federal Republic of Germany. 0141-8637/97 $12 .00

•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

The three channels of many-body perturbation theory: GW, particle–particle, and electron–hole T-matrix self-energies

Roberto Orlando, Pina Romaniello, Pierre‐François Loos

We derive the explicit expression of the three self-energies that one encounters in many-body perturbation theory: the well-known GW self-energy, as well as the particle-particle and electron-hole T-matrix self-energies. Each of these can be easily computed via the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a different random-phase approximation linear eigenvalue problem that completely defines their corresponding response function. For illustrative and comparative purposes, we report the principal ionization potentials of a set of small molecules computed at each level of theory. The performance of these schemes on strongly correlated systems (B2 and C2) is also discussed.

arXiv:2309.04167•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Nov 14, 2023•23 citations
In order to properly understand the utility of many-body perturbation theory as applied to finite systems, we use the configuration interaction approach to compute the electronic self-energy. The validity of the commonly used GWGWGW approximation from many-body perturbation theory is tested by comparing the self-energy explicitly computed according to the diagrammatic expansions to that from the inversion of the Dyson equation. It is constructed as a functional of the interacting Green function GGG and screened Coulomb interaction WWW. WWW is explicitly computed through the diagonalization of the many-body Hamiltonian and, thus, takes polarization effects into account beyond the random phase approximation. The Na9+\mathrm{Na}_{9}{}^{+}Na9​+ cluster and the dissociation of the C2{\mathrm{C}}_{2}C2​ molecule are discussed as examples. We find that the GWGWGW approximation yields accurate results for weakly correlated systems with a predominantly single-determinant ground state such as Na9+\mathrm{Na}_{9}{}^{+}Na9​+ clusters. The C2{\mathrm{C}}_{2}C2​ molecule is a pathological system with multideterminantal ground state where the GWGWGW approach ceases to be valid.
In this lecture we present many-body perturbation theory as a method to determine quasiparticle excitations in solids, especially electronic band structures, accurately from first principles.The main ingredient is the electronic self-energy that, in principle, contains all many-body exchange and correlation effects beyond the Hartree potential.As its exact mathematical expression is unknown, approximations must be used in practical calculations.The approximation is obtained using a systematic algebraic approach on the basis of Green function techniques.It constitutes an expansion of the self-energy up to linear order in the screened Coulomb potential, which describes the interaction between the quasiparticles and includes dynamic screening through the creation of exchange-correlation holes around the bare particles.The implementation of the approximation relies on a perturbative treatment starting from density functional theory.Besides a detailed mathematical discussion we focus on the underlying physical concepts and show some illustrative applications.
Besides the proof of a modified Luttinger–Ward–Klein variational principle and a related self-consistency idea, there is not much new in principle in this paper. L. Hedin, Phys. Rev . 139, A796–823 (1965) Summary In this chapter a set of equations is formulated that determine the self-energy and the one-body Green's function in terms of the screened Coulomb interaction between classical charges. The equations contain a correction to the classical picture in terms of a vertex function. The physical meaning of the various contributions is discussed. The simplest approximation for the vertex yields the random phase approximation for the polarizability and the GW approximation for the self-energy. Various aspects of the GWA are analyzed, with a focus on the physics that is added beyond Hartree– Fock. A brief summary of model cases illustrates the domain of validity and the limits of the GWA. In this chapter we elaborate in more detail on the question of how to calculate the onebody Green's function from a Dyson equation with a self-energy kernel. In the previous chapter a scheme was introduced to design approximations to the self-energy. However, the question of where to stop, which pieces of physics to include and which to neglect, is not yet settled. Of course, there is no unique answer, besides the exact solution, but different strategies can be more or less advantageous in practice. In a system with a few electrons, for example, different aspects will be important than in a system with many electrons. Here we are mostly interested in solids, or more generally in extended systems. In such systems, screening plays an essential role: the interaction between two charges is strongly modified, in general reduced, by the rearrangement of all the other charges. It is therefore most convenient to reformulate the equations such that screening appears explicitly. Some steps in this direction can be found in earlier chapters, in particular in Sec. 8.3, the formulation of the Ψ [ G , W ]-functional of the screened interaction W instead of the Ф[ G , v c ]-functional of the bare v c . In Sec. 10.5 the screened interaction approximation for the self-energy is derived, with the self-energy as a product of the one-body Green's function and the screened interaction W .
We introduce a scheme through which the ground-state electronic density n and total energy Ev [n] of inhomogeneous interacting systems can be determined in a self-consistent (SC) way. It is based on a SC perturbation expansion for the single-particle Green function G. Our employed expansion is argued to be valid under all conditions provided that the ground-state charge density of the interacting system is pure-state non-interacting v representable. The formalism discussed in this paper has been applied to a quasi-one-dimensional periodic system. It has even been possible to carry out SC calculations with the dynamically screened exchange diagram (the so-called GW diagram, where W is the dynamically screened electron-electron interaction function) for the self-energy operator Σ. A coherent mode of interpretation of a number of our results entails that the overwhelming success of the GW framework in relatively accurately reproducing the experimental energy gaps of a number of semiconductors and insulators may be a direct consequence of non-self-consistency effects; whereas a non-self-consistent calculation in our tests increases the value of the local-density approximation (LDA) gap in the range of 40–65% of the ‘experimental’ gaps, self-consistency effects reduce this range to 14–17%. The same line of argument leads us to conclude that, in our model, 26–35% of the LDA error in the gap energies is due to the absence of a well known discontinuity in the LDA exchange-correlation potential, and the remaining part is due to the Kohn-Sham eigenvalues not being identifiable with one-particle excitation energies. A natural conclusion that may be drawn from these observations is that a correct description of excitation energies (e.g. of the gap energy) cannot be achieved without including, at least approximately, the vertex part of Σ, which is entirely absent in the GW scheme.
Many observables such as the density, total energy, or electric current, can be expressed explicitly in terms of the one‐body Green's function, which describes electron addition or removal to or from a system. An efficient way to determine such a Green's function is to introduce a self‐energy, which is a nonlocal and dynamic effective potential that influences the propagation of particles in an interacting system. The state‐of‐the art approximation for the self‐energy is the GW approximation, where the system to (or from) which the electron is added (or removed) is described as a polarizable, screening, medium. This is expressed by the name of the approximation: ‘GW’ stands for the one‐body Green's function G and for W , the dynamically screened Coulomb interaction. The GW approximation is very popular for the calculation of band structures in solids, and increasingly used also to describe nanostructures, clusters, and molecules. As compared to static mean‐field approximations for the effective potential, the dynamical screening of the Coulomb interaction in GW leads to a renormalization of energies, to broadening and/or to the observation of additional excitations. An analysis of the approximations that lead to the GW self‐energy, and of the underlying picture, explains the successes and the limitations of the approach. This article is categorized under: Electronic Structure Theory > Density Functional Theory Electronic Structure Theory > Ab Initio Electronic Structure Methods Theoretical and Physical Chemistry > Spectroscopy Structure and Mechanism > Computational Materials Science
We introduce a scheme through which the ground-state electronic density n and total energy Ey[n] of inhomogeneous interacting systems can be determined in a self-consistent (SC) way. It is based on a SC perturbation expansion for the single-particle Green function G. Our employed expansion is argued to be valid under all conditions provided that the ground-state charge density of the interacting system is pure-state non-interacting v representable. The formalism discussed in this paper has been applied to a quasi-one-dimensional periodic system. It has even been possible to carry out SC calculations with the dynamically screened exchange diagram (the so-called G W diagram, where W is the dynamically screened electron4ectron interaction function) for the selfenergy operator C. A coherent mode of interpretation of a number of our results entails that the overwhelming success of the G W framework in relatively accurately reproducing the experimental energy gaps of a number of semiconductors and insulators may be a direct consequence of non-selfconsistency effects; whereas a non-self-consistent calculation in our tests increases the value of the local-density approximation (LDA) gap in the range of 40-65% of the ‘experimental’ gaps, self-consistency effects reduce this range to 1 4 1 7 % . The same line of argument leads us to conclude that, in our model, 2635% of the LDA error in the gap energies is due to the absence of a well known discontinuity in the LDA exchange-correlation potential, and the remaining part is due to the Kohn-Sham eigenvalues not being identifiable with one-particle excitation energies. A natural conclusion that may be drawn from these observations is that a correct description of excitation energies (e.g. of the gap energy) cannot be achieved without including, at least approximately, the vertex part of C, which is entirely absent in the GW scheme. 5 1 . INTRODUCTION The ground-state (GS) density-functional theory (DFT) due to Hohenberg and Kohn (1964) provides a rigorous foundation for determining properties of systems in their ground states (for reviews see Lundqvist and March (1983), Jones and Gunnarsson (1989) and Dreizler and Gross (1990)). The central position in this theory is taken by the total-energy functional EY[n] which, owing to its unique absolute minimum a t the GS electronic density n, can be used to obtain not only the GS energy but also the GS charge density. tPresent address: Max-Planck-Institut fur Festkorperforschung, HeisenbergstraRe 1, 70569 Stuttgart, Federal Republic of Germany. 0141-8637/97 $12 .00
We derive the explicit expression of the three self-energies that one encounters in many-body perturbation theory: the well-known GW self-energy, as well as the particle-particle and electron-hole T-matrix self-energies. Each of these can be easily computed via the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a different random-phase approximation linear eigenvalue problem that completely defines their corresponding response function. For illustrative and comparative purposes, we report the principal ionization potentials of a set of small molecules computed at each level of theory. The performance of these schemes on strongly correlated systems (B2 and C2) is also discussed.