Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1204.4463 · Physical Review B

Beyond the GW approximation: Combining correlation channels

Pina Romaniello, F. Bechstedt, Lucia Reining

Published Apr 19, 2012• 100 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) the self-energy $\ensuremath{\Sigma}=iGW\ensuremath{\Gamma}$ plays a key role since it contains all the many-body effects of the system. The exact self-energy is not known; as a first approximation one can set the vertex function $\ensuremath{\Gamma}$ to unity which leads to the GW approximation. The latter properly describes the high-density regime, where screening is important; in the low-density regime, instead, other approximations are proposed, such as the $T$ matrix, which describes multiple scattering between two particles. Here we combine the two approaches. Starting from the fundamental equations of MBPT, we show how one can derive the $T$-matrix approximation to the self-energy in a common framework with $GW$. This allows us to elucidate several aspects of this formulation, including the origin of, and link between, the electron-hole and the particle-particle $T$ matrix, the derivation of a screened $T$ matrix, and the conversion of the $T$ matrix into a vertex correction. The exactly solvable Hubbard molecule is used for illustration.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.85.155131

Related papers

Beyond the GW approximation

Richard M. Martin, Lucia Reining, David M. Ceperley

In this chapter, shortcomings of the GW approximation are analyzed, and different ways are proposed to go beyond. The approaches fall into three broad classes: first, one can iterate Hedin's equations that link the self-energy, the polarizability, the screened Coulomb interaction, and the vertex function with the Dyson equation for the one-body Green's function. Second, one can use other Dyson equations like in the T-matrix approach, and third, one can make an ansatz for the one-body Green's function inspired by physical considerations or insight from models, in particular the idea of electron–boson coupling that leads to the cumulant expansion. Applications are given for illustration. Some more ideas and links to subsequent chapters provide an outlook. The GW approximation is a widely used approach in computational electronic structure. However, the previous chapters show some severe limitations. One example is systems with low-energy excitations, as illustrated by the Hubbard dimer in the dissociation limit, where bonding and antibonding orbitals become degenerate. This can be seen in Sec. 11.7. Another example is satellite series, for example in the photoemission spectrum of silicon in Sec. 13.1. Moreover, even in a situation where the approximation is well justified, it induces some error, though maybe small, and one eventually wants to do better. The full self-energy functional is in principle known: it is the Luttinger–Ward sum of skeleton diagrams derived from Eq. (11.35). However, this is an infinite sum, and no closed form of the result is known. Hence, the task is not to invent new diagrams: it is to make a choice of diagrams or combinations of diagrams, which are evaluated fully or in an approximate way. This is the framework of the present chapter. In some cases we will add diagrams to the GWA ones, which gives rise to vertex corrections ; in other cases some of the GWA diagrams are neglected while different ones are taken into account. An example is the T-matrix approximation, which sums ladder diagrams instead of bubbles. In general one tries to combine this with the GWA, especially in extended systems where screening is important. Therefore the GWA plays a prominent role, and the whole chapter is called beyond GW . The chapter contains advanced material, that is in part exploratory and refers to current research. It is intended to make links to communities outside the GW world, and to other chapters.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 31, 2016•0 citations

Many-body perturbation theory: The GW approximation

Christoph Friedrich, Arno Schindlmayr

In this lecture we present many-body perturbation theory as a method to determine quasiparticle excitations in solids, especially electronic band structures, accurately from first principles.The main ingredient is the electronic self-energy that, in principle, contains all many-body exchange and correlation effects beyond the Hartree potential.As its exact mathematical expression is unknown, approximations must be used in practical calculations.The approximation is obtained using a systematic algebraic approach on the basis of Green function techniques.It constitutes an expansion of the self-energy up to linear order in the screened Coulomb potential, which describes the interaction between the quasiparticles and includes dynamic screening through the creation of exchange-correlation holes around the bare particles.The implementation of the approximation relies on a perturbative treatment starting from density functional theory.Besides a detailed mathematical discussion we focus on the underlying physical concepts and show some illustrative applications.

•Jan 1, 2006•19 citations

The self-energy beyond GW: Local and nonlocal vertex corrections

Pina Romaniello, Steve Guyot, Lucia Reining

It is commonly accepted that the GW approximation for the electron self-energy is successful for the description of the band structure of weakly to moderately correlated systems, whereas it will fail for strongly correlated materials. In the present work, we discuss two important aspects of this approximation: first, the "self-screening error," which is due to an incorrect treatment of induced exchange, and second, the atomic limit, in which, instead, correlation is directly responsible for the observed problem. Using the example of the removal of a particle from a box, we show that the self-screening error stems from the use of test charge-test charge screening and that it can be corrected by a two-point vertex contribution to the self-energy derived from time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT). We explain why the addition of a particle, instead, requires the use of a different approximate vertex. This illustrates why the general vertex function, valid both for valence and conduction states, must be a three-point function. Moreover, we show that also the bad performance of GW in the atomic limit is due to the neglect of the vertex in the self-energy; in that case, the TDDFT-derived vertex correction is not sufficient in order to remove the error even qualitatively. We discuss the effects of the self-screening error as well as the atomic limit using GW for the exactly solvable two-site Hubbard model.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Oct 20, 2009•131 citations

The RPA and the GW approximation for the self-energy

Richard M. Martin, Lucia Reining, David M. Ceperley

Besides the proof of a modified Luttinger–Ward–Klein variational principle and a related self-consistency idea, there is not much new in principle in this paper. L. Hedin, Phys. Rev . 139, A796–823 (1965) Summary In this chapter a set of equations is formulated that determine the self-energy and the one-body Green's function in terms of the screened Coulomb interaction between classical charges. The equations contain a correction to the classical picture in terms of a vertex function. The physical meaning of the various contributions is discussed. The simplest approximation for the vertex yields the random phase approximation for the polarizability and the GW approximation for the self-energy. Various aspects of the GWA are analyzed, with a focus on the physics that is added beyond Hartree– Fock. A brief summary of model cases illustrates the domain of validity and the limits of the GWA. In this chapter we elaborate in more detail on the question of how to calculate the onebody Green's function from a Dyson equation with a self-energy kernel. In the previous chapter a scheme was introduced to design approximations to the self-energy. However, the question of where to stop, which pieces of physics to include and which to neglect, is not yet settled. Of course, there is no unique answer, besides the exact solution, but different strategies can be more or less advantageous in practice. In a system with a few electrons, for example, different aspects will be important than in a system with many electrons. Here we are mostly interested in solids, or more generally in extended systems. In such systems, screening plays an essential role: the interaction between two charges is strongly modified, in general reduced, by the rearrangement of all the other charges. It is therefore most convenient to reformulate the equations such that screening appears explicitly. Some steps in this direction can be found in earlier chapters, in particular in Sec. 8.3, the formulation of the Ψ [ G , W ]-functional of the screened interaction W instead of the Ф[ G , v c ]-functional of the bare v c . In Sec. 10.5 the screened interaction approximation for the self-energy is derived, with the self-energy as a product of the one-body Green's function and the screened interaction W .

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 31, 2016•0 citations

The three channels of many-body perturbation theory: GW, particle–particle, and electron–hole T-matrix self-energies

Roberto Orlando, Pina Romaniello, Pierre‐François Loos

We derive the explicit expression of the three self-energies that one encounters in many-body perturbation theory: the well-known GW self-energy, as well as the particle-particle and electron-hole T-matrix self-energies. Each of these can be easily computed via the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a different random-phase approximation linear eigenvalue problem that completely defines their corresponding response function. For illustrative and comparative purposes, we report the principal ionization potentials of a set of small molecules computed at each level of theory. The performance of these schemes on strongly correlated systems (B2 and C2) is also discussed.

arXiv:2309.04167•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Nov 14, 2023•23 citations

Total Energy beyond GW: Exact Results and Guidelines for Approximations

Abdallah El-Sahili, Francesco Sottile, Lucia Reining

The total energy and electron addition and removal spectra can, in principle, be obtained exactly from the one-body Green's function (GF). In practice, the GF is obtained from an approximate self-energy. In the framework of many-body perturbation theory, we derive different expressions that are based on an approximate self-energy, but that yield nevertheless, in principle, the exact exchange-correlation contribution to the total energy for any interaction strength. Response functions play a crucial role, which explains why, for example, ingredients from time-dependent density functional theory can be used to build these approximate self-energies. We show that the key requirement for obtaining exact results is the consistent combination of ingredients. Also when further approximations are made, as it is necessary in practice, this consistency remains the key to obtain good results. All findings are illustrated using the exactly solvable symmetric Hubbard dimer.

arXiv:2312.04154•Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation•Feb 7, 2024•5 citations
In many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) the self-energy \ensuremathΣ=iGW\ensuremathΓ\ensuremath{\Sigma}=iGW\ensuremath{\Gamma}\ensuremathΣ=iGW\ensuremathΓ plays a key role since it contains all the many-body effects of the system. The exact self-energy is not known; as a first approximation one can set the vertex function \ensuremathΓ\ensuremath{\Gamma}\ensuremathΓ to unity which leads to the GW approximation. The latter properly describes the high-density regime, where screening is important; in the low-density regime, instead, other approximations are proposed, such as the TTT matrix, which describes multiple scattering between two particles. Here we combine the two approaches. Starting from the fundamental equations of MBPT, we show how one can derive the TTT-matrix approximation to the self-energy in a common framework with GWGWGW. This allows us to elucidate several aspects of this formulation, including the origin of, and link between, the electron-hole and the particle-particle TTT matrix, the derivation of a screened TTT matrix, and the conversion of the TTT matrix into a vertex correction. The exactly solvable Hubbard molecule is used for illustration.
In this chapter, shortcomings of the GW approximation are analyzed, and different ways are proposed to go beyond. The approaches fall into three broad classes: first, one can iterate Hedin's equations that link the self-energy, the polarizability, the screened Coulomb interaction, and the vertex function with the Dyson equation for the one-body Green's function. Second, one can use other Dyson equations like in the T-matrix approach, and third, one can make an ansatz for the one-body Green's function inspired by physical considerations or insight from models, in particular the idea of electron–boson coupling that leads to the cumulant expansion. Applications are given for illustration. Some more ideas and links to subsequent chapters provide an outlook. The GW approximation is a widely used approach in computational electronic structure. However, the previous chapters show some severe limitations. One example is systems with low-energy excitations, as illustrated by the Hubbard dimer in the dissociation limit, where bonding and antibonding orbitals become degenerate. This can be seen in Sec. 11.7. Another example is satellite series, for example in the photoemission spectrum of silicon in Sec. 13.1. Moreover, even in a situation where the approximation is well justified, it induces some error, though maybe small, and one eventually wants to do better. The full self-energy functional is in principle known: it is the Luttinger–Ward sum of skeleton diagrams derived from Eq. (11.35). However, this is an infinite sum, and no closed form of the result is known. Hence, the task is not to invent new diagrams: it is to make a choice of diagrams or combinations of diagrams, which are evaluated fully or in an approximate way. This is the framework of the present chapter. In some cases we will add diagrams to the GWA ones, which gives rise to vertex corrections ; in other cases some of the GWA diagrams are neglected while different ones are taken into account. An example is the T-matrix approximation, which sums ladder diagrams instead of bubbles. In general one tries to combine this with the GWA, especially in extended systems where screening is important. Therefore the GWA plays a prominent role, and the whole chapter is called beyond GW . The chapter contains advanced material, that is in part exploratory and refers to current research. It is intended to make links to communities outside the GW world, and to other chapters.
In this lecture we present many-body perturbation theory as a method to determine quasiparticle excitations in solids, especially electronic band structures, accurately from first principles.The main ingredient is the electronic self-energy that, in principle, contains all many-body exchange and correlation effects beyond the Hartree potential.As its exact mathematical expression is unknown, approximations must be used in practical calculations.The approximation is obtained using a systematic algebraic approach on the basis of Green function techniques.It constitutes an expansion of the self-energy up to linear order in the screened Coulomb potential, which describes the interaction between the quasiparticles and includes dynamic screening through the creation of exchange-correlation holes around the bare particles.The implementation of the approximation relies on a perturbative treatment starting from density functional theory.Besides a detailed mathematical discussion we focus on the underlying physical concepts and show some illustrative applications.
It is commonly accepted that the GW approximation for the electron self-energy is successful for the description of the band structure of weakly to moderately correlated systems, whereas it will fail for strongly correlated materials. In the present work, we discuss two important aspects of this approximation: first, the "self-screening error," which is due to an incorrect treatment of induced exchange, and second, the atomic limit, in which, instead, correlation is directly responsible for the observed problem. Using the example of the removal of a particle from a box, we show that the self-screening error stems from the use of test charge-test charge screening and that it can be corrected by a two-point vertex contribution to the self-energy derived from time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT). We explain why the addition of a particle, instead, requires the use of a different approximate vertex. This illustrates why the general vertex function, valid both for valence and conduction states, must be a three-point function. Moreover, we show that also the bad performance of GW in the atomic limit is due to the neglect of the vertex in the self-energy; in that case, the TDDFT-derived vertex correction is not sufficient in order to remove the error even qualitatively. We discuss the effects of the self-screening error as well as the atomic limit using GW for the exactly solvable two-site Hubbard model.
Besides the proof of a modified Luttinger–Ward–Klein variational principle and a related self-consistency idea, there is not much new in principle in this paper. L. Hedin, Phys. Rev . 139, A796–823 (1965) Summary In this chapter a set of equations is formulated that determine the self-energy and the one-body Green's function in terms of the screened Coulomb interaction between classical charges. The equations contain a correction to the classical picture in terms of a vertex function. The physical meaning of the various contributions is discussed. The simplest approximation for the vertex yields the random phase approximation for the polarizability and the GW approximation for the self-energy. Various aspects of the GWA are analyzed, with a focus on the physics that is added beyond Hartree– Fock. A brief summary of model cases illustrates the domain of validity and the limits of the GWA. In this chapter we elaborate in more detail on the question of how to calculate the onebody Green's function from a Dyson equation with a self-energy kernel. In the previous chapter a scheme was introduced to design approximations to the self-energy. However, the question of where to stop, which pieces of physics to include and which to neglect, is not yet settled. Of course, there is no unique answer, besides the exact solution, but different strategies can be more or less advantageous in practice. In a system with a few electrons, for example, different aspects will be important than in a system with many electrons. Here we are mostly interested in solids, or more generally in extended systems. In such systems, screening plays an essential role: the interaction between two charges is strongly modified, in general reduced, by the rearrangement of all the other charges. It is therefore most convenient to reformulate the equations such that screening appears explicitly. Some steps in this direction can be found in earlier chapters, in particular in Sec. 8.3, the formulation of the Ψ [ G , W ]-functional of the screened interaction W instead of the Ф[ G , v c ]-functional of the bare v c . In Sec. 10.5 the screened interaction approximation for the self-energy is derived, with the self-energy as a product of the one-body Green's function and the screened interaction W .
We derive the explicit expression of the three self-energies that one encounters in many-body perturbation theory: the well-known GW self-energy, as well as the particle-particle and electron-hole T-matrix self-energies. Each of these can be easily computed via the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a different random-phase approximation linear eigenvalue problem that completely defines their corresponding response function. For illustrative and comparative purposes, we report the principal ionization potentials of a set of small molecules computed at each level of theory. The performance of these schemes on strongly correlated systems (B2 and C2) is also discussed.
The total energy and electron addition and removal spectra can, in principle, be obtained exactly from the one-body Green's function (GF). In practice, the GF is obtained from an approximate self-energy. In the framework of many-body perturbation theory, we derive different expressions that are based on an approximate self-energy, but that yield nevertheless, in principle, the exact exchange-correlation contribution to the total energy for any interaction strength. Response functions play a crucial role, which explains why, for example, ingredients from time-dependent density functional theory can be used to build these approximate self-energies. We show that the key requirement for obtaining exact results is the consistent combination of ingredients. Also when further approximations are made, as it is necessary in practice, this consistency remains the key to obtain good results. All findings are illustrated using the exactly solvable symmetric Hubbard dimer.