Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Bonn, Wegdam, and Schall Reply:

Daniel Bonn, Gerard H. Wegdam, Peter Schall

Published Jul 29, 2010• 24 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A Reply to the Comment by Andrea Gambassi and S. Dietrich.
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.105.059602

Related papers

Luis and Sánchez-Soto Reply:

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

A Reply to the Comment by Englert, Scully, and Walther.

Physical Review Letters•Feb 28, 2000•3 citations

Scarcelli, Berardi, and Shih Reply:

Giuliano Scarcelli, V. Berardi, Yanhua H. Shih

A Reply to the Comment by A. Gatti et al..

Physical Review Letters•Jan 17, 2007•25 citations

Reply to the comment by C.Camacho on PRL, v.77, p.5433

Alexander Gutin, Victor Abkevich, Eugene I. Shakhnovich

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

arXiv:cond-mat/9703230•Mar 26, 1997•0 citations

Gopalakrishnan, Martin, and Demler Reply:

Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Ivar Martin, Eugene Demler

A Reply to the Comments by M. Sandbrink et al. and R. Lifshitz.

Physical Review Letters•Aug 13, 2014•2 citations

Zabala, Puska, and Nieminen Reply:

Nerea Zabala, Martti J. Puska, R. M. Nieminen

A Reply to the Comment by Oleg A. Starykh and Dmitrii L. Maslov.

Physical Review Letters•Apr 5, 1999•7 citations

Groh and Dietrich Reply:

Benito Groh, S. Dietrich

A Reply to the Comment by M. Widom and H. Zhang.Received 17 June 1994DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2617©1995 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Mar 27, 1995•26 citations