Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. B, Condensed matter

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Microscopic stress tensors in quantum systems’ ’’

Nathan Orlando Folland

Published Jun 15, 1988• 6 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The theory of microscopic stress tensors is discussed in the context of comments by Nielsen and Martin. Microscopic stress tensors are interpreted as physically observable quantities.Received 5 May 1988DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.10908©1988 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.37.10908

Related papers

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Quantum chaotic system in the generalized Husimi representation’ ’’

Karol Życzkowski

The interpretation of Milburn in the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev A 39, 2749 (1989)] is confirmed in further numerical study.Received 7 December 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.39.2751©1989 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Mar 1, 1989•1 citation

Reply to "Comment on `Equilibrium order parameters and chemical potentials in rotating superfluids' "

Tin-Lun Ho, N. David Mermin

While we find Combescot's physical point plausible, we disagree with his characterization of the context and logical structure of our argument.Received 30 March 1981DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.25.3395©1982 American Physical Society

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Mar 1, 1982•0 citations

Comment on “Nonclassical States: An Observable Criterion”

Lajos Diósi

A Comment on the Letter by Werner Vogel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1849 (2000). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 14 April 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2841©2000 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Sep 1, 2000•24 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Langevin equation for the squeezing of light by means of a parametric oscillator’ ’’

Trevor W. Marshall

We try to place the preceding Comment by Kinsler and Drummond [Phys. Rev. A 44, 7848 (1991)] in an overall scientific context.Received 30 April 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.44.7851©1991 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1991•2 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Lagrange-multiplier method in correlated-electron systems: Exact diagonalization study’ ”

Takashi Yanagisawa

We reply to the preceding Comment by Sten. We discuss a role of the Lagrange multipliers using an exact diagonalization.Received 12 November 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.12692©1999 American Physical Society

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•May 15, 1999•0 citations

Cary, Rusu, and Skodje reply

J. R. Cary, Petre Rusu, Rex T. Skodje

A reply to he comment on quantum effects in a macroscopic system is prsented. (AIP)Received 26 June 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.943©1987 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Aug 24, 1987•2 citations
The theory of microscopic stress tensors is discussed in the context of comments by Nielsen and Martin. Microscopic stress tensors are interpreted as physically observable quantities.Received 5 May 1988DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.10908©1988 American Physical Society