Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. B, Condensed matter

Reply to "Comment on `Equilibrium order parameters and chemical potentials in rotating superfluids' "

Tin-Lun Ho, N. David Mermin

Published Mar 1, 1982• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

While we find Combescot's physical point plausible, we disagree with his characterization of the context and logical structure of our argument.Received 30 March 1981DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.25.3395©1982 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.25.3395

Related papers

Superfluidity at Supersonic Speed?

Mourad Haddad, Vincent Hakim

A Comment on the Letter by C. K. Law, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1598 (2000). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 12 May 2001DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.218901©2001 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Nov 2, 2001•8 citations

Reply to ``Comment on `Weakly bound states of the He-He-Ca triatomic system' ''

Qingdong Gou, Yong Li

There are three points in the preceding Comment. We agree with the first point, and we point out that the second and third points are due to a misunderstanding.Received 10 June 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.016502©2012 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Jul 25, 2012•2 citations

Comment on “Magnus and Iordanskii Forces in Superfluids”

Henry Edgar Hall, John R. Hook

A Comment on the Letter by H. E. Hall and J. R. Hook, Phys. Rev. Lett 79, 1321 (1997). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 18 August 1997DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4356©1998 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 11, 1998•23 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Sound velocity and multibranch Bogoliubov spectrum of an elongated Fermi superfluid in the BEC-BCS crossover’”

Tarun Kanti Ghosh, Kazushige Machida

We are providing a Reply to the preceding Comment.Received 19 June 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.057602©2006 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Nov 9, 2006•2 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Microscopic stress tensors in quantum systems’ ’’

Nathan Orlando Folland

The theory of microscopic stress tensors is discussed in the context of comments by Nielsen and Martin. Microscopic stress tensors are interpreted as physically observable quantities.Received 5 May 1988DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.10908©1988 American Physical Society

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Jun 15, 1988•6 citations

Reply to "Common on `Superfluidity in the interior-gap states'"

Shin-Tza Wu, Sungkit Yip

We show that the recent Comment by Liu and Wilczek (cond-mat/0304632) on our work (PRA 67, 053603) is incorrect.

arXiv:cond-mat/0305675•May 29, 2003•0 citations
While we find Combescot's physical point plausible, we disagree with his characterization of the context and logical structure of our argument.Received 30 March 1981DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.25.3395©1982 American Physical Society